'A lot is said about England not wanting to attack but that has never been a message pushed on us as players'
Missing England second row Joe Launchbury has admitted he has been pleased with how Eddie Jones’ team have nurtured their attack during his absence for the 2021 Guinness Six Nations. The soon-to-be 30-year-old lock started all four of England’s matches during their Autumn Nations Cup success, a triumph where the consensus was that it was built on the strength of their defence more than anything else.
Launchbury was set to be involved for the Six Nations but he dropped out in January a few days after the original 28-man squad was announced by Jones due to a leg fracture that he is set to return from this Friday when Wasps travel to Newcastle in the Gallagher Premiership.
The stress fracture to his fibula left the lock watching on as Jonny Hill and Charlie Ewels have partnered Maro Itoje in the Test XV and while England generally struggled on the front foot in February, they hit back with an admirable win last Saturday over France.
How England attacked in that round four match, added to some of their play in the round three loss to Wales, has been pleasing and Launchbury was left impressed despite his own frustrations at not being able to play.
“The challenge has been slightly different,” he said when asked what he has seen differently about England in spring compared to last autumn. “The autumn was kind of a unique series. Wales were trying to change the way they were playing, trying to change their personnel, and we felt we adapted to that (Autumn Nations) tournament the best out of those teams and came away with winning the tournament which was the goal.
“Now with slightly better conditions, the game has gone a bit more attack. There has been a lot of external pressure from the media and I guess supporters in general to try and play a more attacking style of rugby. When you see teams like France play on their day it’s very hard to not appreciate and get excited about the way they try and play the game. It is great to watch and England have always had that ability to go to that.
“They don’t mind hiding behind the fact that set-piece and defence are always huge cornerstones of the way that any English team has played over the years. But for sure it has been pleasing to see a bit more attacking intent over the last couple of games.
“I don’t think that has never not been the intention. A lot is said about England not wanting to attack but any experience I have in camp that has never been a message pushed on us as players. It has always been 'play in the right sort of way'.
“But yeah, it has been pleasing to see a slightly more expansive brand I guess of stuff from England whilst also winning because international rugby is fundamentally about winning.”
Latest Comments
Agreed. And I don't have much more to say on it, but I had been having one thought that sprang to mind at the tail of this discussion, and that is that it's not all about Razor.
It's not about any coach being "right". I think a lot of selections can become defense and while it doesn't really apply here I really enjoyed that Andy Farrell just gave into the public demands and changed out his team for the change that had been asked for. Like why not? This is the countries team, keep them engaged. The whole reason i've only just finished watching the game was because I wasn't interested in watching any of the selected players against a team like Italy (still actually enjoyed the first half with the contest Italy made of it).
Faz leap frogs a younger half back into start. He hands the golden child the game over July's golden child. He gives an old winger a go, a new flanker and hooker. None of them really did any good, certainly not enough to suggest they should have been promoted above others, but who cares? You won, and you gave the country what they wanted, that's all that matters after all. It's for the country, not the one in charge who thinks they have to have their own pied piper tune playing.
Go to commentsAs Naas would say... A win is a win.
It was not perfect and at times frustrating. All 3 tests were not the best by the Boks and they still found ways to win.
Rassie would have noted the sloppyness at times and silly mistakes. The 9's made amateur handling mistakes when clearing the rucks in all 3 tests.
Once the "stupid" mistakes are eliminated, this Bok team will be very very hard to beat.
Go to comments