'A straight red, no question' - Controversial high shot from prop Lomax overshadows the dominance of the All Blacks scrum
The All Blacks made sure to end their season on a high, dominating the Pumas to run out 38-0 winners in Newcastle on Saturday night.
Out to avenge their historic loss to Argentina two weeks ago, the All Blacks were in control from the get-go – even though this didn’t necessarily reflect on the scoreboard. With 74% of possession across the opening half, they led by just 10-points to nil at the break.
Tries to Ardie Savea, Patrick Tuipulotu, and two in three minutes to super-sub Will Jordan helped finished the rout.
But arguably the most pleasing thing for the All Blacks, alongside the breakout tests from Jordan and Blindside Flanker Akira Ioane, was the humiliation of the Pumas at the set-piece. Especially at the scrum, the All Blacks were in complete and utter control.
Joe Moody played nearly as well as a prop can in his 50th test match, and Nepo Laulala wasn’t too far behind.
Argentinian rugby has historically prided itself on its scrummaging, which is what makes Saturday’s showing especially surprising and concerning from the Pumas.
Their dominance at the scrum continued until just before the one-hour mark, when both Moody and Laulala were rewarded with a well-earned rest.
Karl Tu’inukuafe and Tyrel Lomax came on as substitutes, but were penalised at their first scrum.
While the All Blacks finally made their control over the possession stats count in the second-half with 21-points, it was just after the siren had sounded that the game took a controversial turn.
With the All Blacks up 31-0, replacement Lomax was shown a yellow card for a high shot on a defenceless Pumas player. It was originally overlooked by the on-field referee, but the TMO brought it to the attention of Nic Berry.
The former Australian under-20s representative has been heavily criticised on social media for the incident of foul play.
Fans on Twitter have disagreed with Nic Berry’s decision to give Lomax a yellow card, with one suggesting that it was a “blatant red card.”
Blatant red card. Boy is blessed. Swinging arm straight to the head of a player in a defenceless position.
— Brian Dowling (@dowlking1) November 28, 2020
That is shocking. A straight red, no question. Clear contact with the head with a swinging arm.
— Lee Farrow (@farrow_lee) November 28, 2020
How on earth was that not a red, ludicrous decision
— Raniel Dead (@raniel_dead) November 28, 2020
Red all day ! Straight contact to the head
— Greg Philps (@gregphilps) November 29, 2020
Clearly a red!!
— Mike Kapsalis (@mikekapsalis) November 28, 2020
Absolute shocker! He lifted his elbow with deliberate intentions to hit his opponents head .referee bottled it ,a citing and a lengthy ban awaits .nm
— mark thomas (@markthomas157cb) November 28, 2020
Ref said there were mitigating factors but the player was on the floor, didn’t change and position and it was a deliberate forearm to the head. Madness how it was a yellow, made worse by Justin Marshall joking about mitigating factors in regards to previous reds ?
— Mana Rugby (@mana_rugby) November 28, 2020
Doesn't matter if it's the 1st minute or the 80th. That's a red card, shocking work from the officials.
— Jon Garbett (@JonnyG92) November 29, 2020
I thought it was going to be red. Lack of swinging arm might have saved him, but lucky.
— Dave Kimber (@dave_kimber) November 28, 2020
Shocking. It's also a unessasery clearout, he just wanted to smash the man.
— Scott Laird (@scott_laird88) November 28, 2020
The match was the All Blacks’ final test for the year, as they’re now set to begin two weeks of quarantine.
They have likely locked up the Tri Nations title though, with both the Pumas and Wallabies needing upwards of a 90-point victory in the final round to steal the title.
Latest Comments
I like Andy’s critical approach to all hot issues especially when it comes to the rugby big “bosses”. However, sorry Andy, I don’t support your “we shouldn’t be questioning the integrity of Karl Dickson or any other official”. May I ask why? They do have a lot of responsibility, but they are people like us with all their sins and weaknesses. We have to respect their decision during the games, but why they became untouchable afterwards and people cannot even criticize them and the ones, who does express their concerns, got punished for publicly analyzing their mistakes and asking questions. If they believe they did right, there shouldn’t be a problem for any of the refs to answer these “questions” publicly. I don’t really remember such cases. However, I do remember how Craig Joubert shown his running skills in 2015 or Pascal Gauzere shined in Cardiff in 2021. I do believe that Rassie, as anybody else, had a full right to share his vision of Nic Berry’s performance the same year. I do not support the hate in any form especially in public one, but creating the cast of untouchable refs and rugby bosses is not for me. As for Karl, he had all means to question his appointment for the game and since I don’t now whether he did it, blaming just RFU wouldn’t be quite correct at this moment. I love the game of rugby and almost every time I watch it I don’t support any team, I just wanna see the good game and fair referring. Sorry, Karl. last Saturday you got my Craig Joubert”s award of the round. It is up to Karl to prove that I am wrong, not to Andy or RFU’s corporate bla-bla-bla. Something like that…
Go to commentswell remember the blues had a guy called jed rowlands for a season. remember scott took his coaching team with him give him time
Go to comments