Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

All Blacks forwards coach explains what he would ban about the rolling maul

All Blacks versus Ireland in 2022 (Photo by Fiona Goodall/Getty Images)

One of the big trends of Super Rugby Pacific in 2022 and the wider game was the amount of rolling maul tries teams were scoring.

ADVERTISEMENT

Hookers across the competition were outscoring wingers and bagging hat-tricks as the rolling maul became an unstoppable force that nearly every team relied on.

Last year ex-All Black Justin Marshall was highly critical of the one-dimensional approach but noticed in the opening round this season a sharp drop off in maul tries.

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

There were plenty of high-scoring games in round one of Super Rugby Pacific but Marshall was left scratching his head trying to remember any from the rolling maul.

Current All Blacks forwards coach Jason Ryan explained to Marshall on SEN Radio that he saw stricter officiating around access to the maul and an improvement in maul defence across the board over the opening weekend.

“We’ve got to watch where the game is trending and what is actually happening at the moment,” Ryan explained to SEN Radio.

“Around the blocking and access [rules] with the rolling maul, it’s always been there but it just hasn’t been policed as much.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think teams are getting pretty good defensively, we are seeing a lot of quick taps come in now. It’s a really big trend in the game.”

The quick taps have been used frequently in the Northern Hemisphere to run a set play around the forwards and the Chiefs were the first team to bag a try with the tactic on Friday night’s opener.

A smart tap on by Josh Ioane found Alex Nankivell who stepped inside one defender to score after lead-up work from the Chiefs forwards.

Ryan was still a big supporter of having the maul as an integral part of the game but would make some rule changes to stop the defensive side getting overpowered through sheer numbers.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Just on the maul, I’m a great believer that is a big part of the game, but I think we could make some adjustments to it,” he explained.

“I believe if you start in that lineout, you should stay in that lineout. You can’t pile numbers in [to the maul].

“When that happens, the next minute you’ve got 14 guys mauling, that’s when it looks messy.

“If you got a lineout, it’s a six plus lineout, well just get on with it and have those guys in there.

“I think that would be a way forward.”

Another suggestion was to stop giving the mauling team a second crack and forcing them to play the ball once they’ve had their first stop.

“Yes I think so, there are ways you can look at that sort of thing,” Ryan said.

“At the All Blacks we don’t like going to ground, we always stay up, we treat that as a reset scrum. We want to keep moving.

“There are things you can tweak but the powers that be will be having those discussions.

“The fact that they are blocking access is a good thing.”

ADVERTISEMENT

South Africa v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

France v New Zealand | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

England v Wales | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

Lions Share | Episode 3

Zimbabwe vs Kenya | Rugby Africa Cup Semi Final | Full Match Replay

USA vs Spain | Men's International | Full Match Replay

Portugal vs Ireland | Men's International | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

5 Comments
S
Spew_81 869 days ago

Sensible suggestions. I'm sure nearly all would agree that only the participants of the lineout should he able to participate in the maul - which is formed directly from a lineout.


I'm unconvinced that the maul is still an integral part of rugby. Apart from lineout drives, and players held up in the tackle you basically never see a maul anymore. Also the way it is used after a lineout is basically as another set piece.

v
vP 869 days ago

It is 100% part of rugby, remove it and what your left with is league. I would like to see more rolling mauls off open field play as defences are spread out to far and for the offence to create space you need to draw those defensive players back in to a contest for the ball. i




What I'm noticing is the removing of contests for the ball from the game. Scrums aren't contest anymore (feeds don't need to be straight, scrum 1/2's can't follow ball) When was the last time you saw the ball stolen at a set scrum?

Lineouts are barely contests, most of the time teams don't compete for the ball. ( My law change would be if a team doesn't compete who cares if its not straight).


I think the WR needs to stop messing with the Laws and just start playing the game and reacting to it. If one team has the upper hand do you change the laws or work harder or smarter to beat them.


Kiwis are feeling a little insecure with their ability to stop the maul internationally and are now looking at changing the laws

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

U
Upnorth-taniwha 30 minutes ago
New Zealanders may not understand, but in France Test rugby is the 'B movie'

So with all that's been said, France sending a b team, top 14 so strong, we support ab’s, they support top 14 and WC and six nations. It is what it is, but do you think that the results of this tour have matched the outcry? Like the first test against a so called b side? Yes we won, just. The second test was better, but against a lesser team apparently. And the third test we will experiment, to a degree. But we are still not thrashing them. One would expect if the teams they are sending are so bad, then why aren't we holding them scoreless and why aren't we putting 50-60 points on them every week? We put all our emphasis on international rugby, yet the show isn't what one would think it would be considering all the facts. I don't know, but I was really expecting the ABS to come out in the first test and show France how pissed off they were that they had sent a mediocre test team. Send them home thrashed and with their Tails between there legs, but I don't know. I think they would go home confident that even if they put the b side in, they can compete against a power house AB team. Not good for us, more so for them. As we all know, the mental side of international rugby is huge. Players confidence can set there path for their careers. So I think it was a perfect chance to absolutely dent the confidence of these up and comers, so when they faced us again in the future, they wouldnt be so keen! And if the ABs had really smashed this team and any other team that done the same, then it would be a message to all international sides. That if you do so, you do so at your own risk and at the expense of the growth of your players going forwards. I get what everyone is saying in regards to all the other stuff. Yes we have a lot to work on. But firstly we need to win, and win big. Otherwise these complaints of b sides, look rather silly. Yes we are 2 nil up. The second test against a much weeker side was better-ish. But C'mon, if they want to send b sides, we should treat them like that, and really be smashing them. Confidence in any player, can be changed for the entirety of their careers. Maybe if we did this, they would realise the effects and send stronger teams. But I don't think that so far this series, any player would feel like they wouldn't want another go at the ABs and can face up to them. Just a thought

80 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Feyi-Waboso returns as England change 12 for USA with 6 debutants Feyi-Waboso returns as England change 12 for USA with 6 debutants