'Inevitable' - All Whites considering name change to avoid offence
New Zealand Football is considering changing the name of its senior men's international side, the "All Whites", to avoid racist connotations.
The sport's governing body has confirmed it was reviewing the name, setting the scene for arguments between old school traditionalists and those who value inclusivity.
The All Whites nickname dates back 40 years to its qualification run to the 1982 World Cup, when New Zealand donned an all-white kit for the first time against Taiwan.
The fan-given nickname stuck, the moniker sitting as an irreverent contrast to the senior men's rugby side, the All Blacks.
Many New Zealand national sporting side have colour-based nicknames: the men's cricket side are the Black Caps, the men's basketball side are the Tall Blacks.
However, none rankle like the All Whites, which can be read to mean excluding other ethnicities.
The question of the name change comes as many New Zealand organisations adopt names and identities that incorporate Maori culture and language.
NZ Football chief executive Andrew Pragnell confirmed the discussions were taking place, saying the body was "on a journey around cultural inclusivity".
"We are in the process of working with stakeholders across the game, as well as people from outside football, looking at all areas of the organisation to make sure they are fit for purpose in 2021 and beyond," he said.
"It is too early in the process to speak about any outcomes but this is an important piece of work as we strive to be the most inclusive sport in Aotearoa."
Harry Ngata - former All Whites player, union representative and commentator - told AAP he didn't have a personal view and could see both sides of the debate.
"A lot of our sporting teams are based on colour," he said.
"Twenty years ago the name wouldn't have raised an eyebrow. That's just the way it was. The class of 2010 are a lot more progressive.
"(A change) is probably inevitable that given the circumstances, the climate we're living in at the moment."
Another ex-All Whites star, Ryan Nelsen, told Radio NZ the name should go if "it displeases a tiny minority".
"Just because it's been around for (40 years) doesn't mean it's right," the former Premier League defender said.
"We should be having this conversation about inclusivity. (The name) shouldn't have any negative connotations at all."
The Crusaders, the Christchurch-based Super Rugby team, were forced to confront the appropriateness of their team name in the wake of the 2019 Mosques terror attack.
The terrorist - who killed 51 people - used the religious crusades of the Middle Ages as an inspiration for his shooting spree.
The Super Rugby side decided to keep the name but remove provocative aspects of the moniker: including a knight wielding a sword as their logo, and a knight on horseback at matches.
Latest Comments
Agree with Wilson B- at best. And that is down to skilled individual players who know how to play the game - not a cohesive squad who know their roles and game plan. For those who claim that takes time to develop, the process is to keep the game plan simple at first and add layers as the squad gels and settles in to the new systems. Lack of progress against the rush D, lack of penetration and innovation in the mid-field, basic skill errors and loose forwards coming second in most big games all still evident in game 14 of the season. Hard to see significant measureable progress.
Go to commentsKeep telling yourself that. The time for a fresh broom is at the beginning - not some "balanced, incremental" (i.e. status quo) transition. All teams establish the way forward at the beginning. This coaching group lacked ideas and courage and the players showed it on the pitch. Backs are only average. Forwards are unbalanced and show good set piece but no domination in traditional AB open play. Unfortunately, Foster - Mark 2. You may be happy with those performances and have some belief in some "cunning plan" but I don't see any evidence of it. Rassie is miles ahead and increasing the gap.
Go to comments