An ex-NZR boss has called on 'out of touch' CEO Robinson to resign
Ex-New Zealand Rugby boss David Moffett has slammed current NZR CEO Mark Robinson, claiming he should return home from attending the Commonwealth Games in Britain and write his letter of resignation. Moffett led the NZR during the early years of the game turning pro, serving as CEO from 1996 to 2000.
Having since worked with NRL, Sport England and the Welsh Rugby Union, Moffett now lives in Canterbury and he weighed in on the chaos that has engulfed rugby in New Zealand in recent weeks with an appearance on Mike Hosking Breakfast, the Newstalk ZB radio show.
Robinson has come under fire for his handling of the fallout from the All Blacks’ 1-2 Test series loss to Ireland and his stewardship was heavily criticised in midweek by ex-team boss Steve Hansen, who claimed the relationship between players and the board was the worst it has ever been.
Now, Moffett has weighed in on the controversy, suggesting it is time for Robinson to quit following a messy episode for the NZR. “He [Robinson] should come back to New Zealand and while he is here, write his letter of resignation," said Moffett.
"It's debilitating for everyone, but especially the fans. If Robinson cared about the fans he would be here speaking directly to the fans and saying, 'These are the mistakes we have made, this is what we are doing to correct it and I am going to be accountable’.
https://www.iheart.com/podcast/24837692/episode/99842942/?keyid%5B0%5D=The%20Mike%20Hosking%20Breakfast&keyid%5B1%5D=David%20Moffett%3A%20Former%20NZR%20boss%20calls%20for%20resignation%20of%20Mark%20Robinson&sc=podcast_widget
"How out of touch are these guys in New Zealand Rugby? Saying nothing is the least favourite option? He should be back here, fronting the media, holding up his hand - not leaving it up to guys like (Ian) Foster to front the media on this bloody shambles. It's chaotic in there at the moment.
"Steve said that he might one day make a good CEO. Well, the CEO of New Zealand Rugby is not the place to learn how to be a CEO. You have to hit the ground running and your judgement has to be spot on. But the worst piece of judgement at the moment is the guy refuses to front the media. Foster's got his own accountabilities, but the buck stops not with the board but with him [Robinson]."
Latest Comments
What’s new its a common occurrence, just the journos out there expecting a negative spin. The outcome will be beneficial to jordie and Leinster. The home grown lads hav got some experience to step up to and be more competitive, that or spend the 6 months keeping the bench warm.
Go to commentsI’m all for speeding up the game. But can we be certain that the slowness of the game contributed to fans walking out? I’m not so sure. Super rugby largely suffered from most fans only being able to, really, follow the games played in their own time zone. So at least a third of the fan base wasn’t engaged at any point in time. As a Saffer following SA teams in the URC - I now watch virtually every European game played on the weekend. In SR, I wouldn’t be bothered to follow the games being played on the other side of the world, at weird hours, if my team wasn’t playing. I now follow the whole tournament and not just the games in my time zone. Second, with New Zealand teams always winning. It’s like formula one. When one team dominates, people lose interest. After COVID, with SA leaving and Australia dipping in form, SR became an even greater one horse race. Thats why I think Japan’s league needs to get in the mix. The international flavor of those teams could make for a great spectacle. But surely if we believe that shaving seconds off lost time events in rugby is going to draw fans back, we should be shown some figures that supports this idea before we draw any major conclusions. Where are the stats that shows these changes have made that sort of impact? We’ve measured down to the average no. Of seconds per game. Where the measurement of the impact on the fanbase? Does a rugby “fan” who lost interest because of ball in play time suddenly have a revived interest because we’ve saved or brought back into play a matter of seconds or a few minutes each game? I doubt it. I don’t thinks it’s even a noticeable difference to be impactful. The 20 min red card idea. Agreed. Let’s give it a go. But I think it’s fairer that the player sent off is substituted and plays no further part in the game as a consequence.
Go to comments