Andre Esterhuizen's Sharks return delayed despite completing his ban
Sharks Currie Cup coach JP Pietersen has shared the latest news regarding the much-anticipated on-field return of Springboks midfielder Andre Esterhuizen in the black jersey. Esterhuizen has rejoined the Sharks from Gallagher Premiership club Harlequins, whom he signed for in 2020 when he exited the Durban-based franchise.
Selected to play against Wales in June in London, the powerhouse centre was also named in the Springboks squad for their July matches against Ireland (two) and Portugal. However, he received a four-match ban for a red card offence during the July 20 win over the Portuguese in Bloemfontein.
The 30-year-old was initially issued with a yellow card by Scottish referee Hollie Davidson for head-on-head contact with opposite number Jose Lima at the Free State Stadium. That sanction was then upgraded to red after a TMO bunker review and Esterhuizen was subsequently left out of the Springboks’ Rugby Championship squad.
Having completed the tackle school intervention, the final match of his four-game ban was scrapped, making him available for selection in this Saturday’s round seven Currie Cup match away to the Cheetahs. Sharks supporters, though, will have to wait a little longer to see him take to the field.
“Andre is available to play,” conformed Pietersen following his team announcement. “He is training with John Plumtree in the United Rugby Championship (URC) team, so unfortunately I don’t have access to him for this weekend’s match.”
Despite the midfielder not being in action this weekend, the Cheetahs had a plan for the imposing threat Esterhuizen would have posed. “He is a big guy,” said Cheetahs director of rugby Frans Steyn. “I really enjoyed him a lot when I was at the Springboks. Luckily we all built the same, two legs, two arms, so we just need to tackle him around his ankles.”
Latest Comments
That's really stupidly pedantic. Let's say the gods had smiled on us, and we were playing Ireland in Belfast on this trip. Then you'd be happy to accept it as a tour of the UK. But they're not going to Australia, or Peru, or the Philippines, they're going to the UK. If they had a match in Paris it would be fair to call it the "end-of-year European tour". I think your issue has less to do with the definition of the United Kingdom, and is more about what is meant by the word "tour". By your definition of the word, a road trip starting in Marseilles, tootling through the Massif Central and cruising down to pop in at La Rochelle, then heading north to Cherbourg, moving along the coast to imagine what it was like on the beach at Dunkirk, cutting east to Strasbourg and ending in Lyon cannot be called a "tour of France" because there's no visit to St. Tropez, or the Louvre, or Martinique in the Caribbean.
Go to commentsJust thought for a moment you might have gathered some commonsense from a southerner or a NZer and shut up. But no, idiots aren't smart enough to realise they are idiots.
Go to comments