Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Asleep on the job' - English rugby chiefs torn to shreds by MPs

(Photo by Catherine Ivill/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

English rugby chiefs have been accused by MPs of overseeing “a failure on an epic scale” following the demise of Wasps and Worcester Warriors who have both entered administration with massive debts.

ADVERTISEMENT

Bill Sweeney OBE, chief executive, Rugby Football Union and Simon Massie-Taylor, chief executive, Premiership Rugby Limited appeared before the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee today and faced stiff questioning about their parts in the “shambles” that has unfolded this season and reduced the Gallagher Premiership from 13 to 11 teams during the season.

Leading the widespread criticism was committee chair Julian Knight MP who told Massie-Taylor: “I have never come across anything as shambolic, lack of care and lack of thought towards people in your own game in my entire time as a select committee member.”

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

The committee chairman then accused Sweeney of being “asleep on the job” in checking the credentials of discredited Worcester owners Colin Goldring and Jason Whittingham. Sweeney replied, “I don’t accept that.”

Knight said: “How much financial support has the RFU given to support players and staff (at Worcester and Wasps)?”

Sweeney: “We don’t have the funds of financial support in that situation.”

Knight: “So, diddly squat, basically.

“You frankly have failed in this instance and so has the RFU. Should you not be looking at your own positions?”

Related

The sharp exchange continued with a clearly frustrated Knight addressing Sweeney stating: “It looks to be as if you are living in isolation in some ivory tower without any intonation about what was going on. You are allowing someone (Goldring) who you later discover to have been banned by a major institution (SRA) to retain ownership of a rugby club and then you are not even banning them after they have driven it into the ground.

ADVERTISEMENT

“How did you allow a liar and asset stripper to destroy a community club?”

Sweeney replied that the owners had gone through a fit and proper test in 2018 and passed but accepted there was currently no ongoing monitoring system and that this was one of the recommendations from “this sorry episode”, adding: “They certainly wouldn’t get through a fit and proper test now.”

Knight hit back: “So you lived in isolation while watching other clubs in other sports go under due to similar circumstances as Worcester and you were asleep on the job and so was your board.

“You are paid to ensure your clubs survive. Why have you failed in that?”

Sweeney defended the RFU against accusations from former CEO Francis Baron that it had run up huge debts insisting the next set of accounts that would be revealed shortly showed the Union was debt free. Sweeney said: “We have £126m in reserve including £90m from the CVC money and we are currently debt free. We expected to make £8m profit this year but we are going to break even. Our utility bills have increased from £2.2m to £7.5m.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Carol Hart, chief executive, Worcester Warriors Foundation, gave evidence at an earlier sitting and accused English rugby chiefs of failing in their duties to look after the sport, telling the committee, “The governing bodies were sleepwalking through this entire nightmare and still do.”

She also revealed that a loss of the “P” share which could be bought back from Worcester by Premiership Rugby after administration would remove £70,000 of central funding for the Foundation. She insisted that heads of department at the club had voiced concerns over the owners for two years before the crisis came to a head. She also told the committee a total of 400 people were directly involved in the ramifications of administration at the club. Sweeney denied the RFU had been warned and promised to investigate this matter.

Local MP Robin Walker highlighted that Worcester had not had a finance director in place for the last two years and that fact “told a story” about the attitude of the owners. He also agreed with the committee chairman, that there had been “a failure of governance” of the sport.

MPs also took the Rugby Players Association to task over their ability to help those affected at Wasps and Worcester as the players’ organisation “had not been fit for purpose” to handle the ramifications of two clubs entering administration.

Knight said in his view that Wasps and Worcester had been left to “twist in the wind” and that the demise of both clubs would be the subject of a special report by the committee as the situation would be “laughable” if it wasn’t so tragic. He said: “I’m going to write to the Serious Fraud Office concerning Mr Colin Goldrings activities” and finished the meeting stating: “It all adds up to a failure on an epic scale.”

ADVERTISEMENT

KOKO Show | July 8th | Bernard Foley stops by to talk the Wallabies winning and Lions being tested

England v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Georgia vs Ireland | Men’s International | Full Match Replay

Lions Share | Episode 2

Chile vs Romania | Men’s International | Full Match Replay

USA vs Belgium | Men’s International | Full Match Replay

Touchdown in Dublin, The Red Sea Returns & We Prepare to Face Argentina | Ep 2: The Ultimate Test

South Africa v British & Irish Lions | 2009 | Second Test | The Vaults

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

E
Ed the Duck 54 minutes ago
Can Les Bleus avoid a Black-wash in New Zealand?

Florian Grill, President FFR 20.5.2025


https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/360695274/french-rugby-boss-says-les-bleus-stars-could-tour-they-target-series-win-against-all-blacks


“French rugby is indeed based on a unique model, built around the Top 14 - a championship of exceptional intensity - and an ambitious national team, This demanding model places a significant physical and mental toll on players throughout the season. We therefore have a major responsibility: to look after their physical and mental health and to ensure they have essential rest periods. In this context, the selection for the July tour is based on two clear principles. First, an in-depth analysis conducted by the French team staff evaluates the players’ physical integrity, fatigue level, and current performance level in order to build a squad that is both strong and mindful of the players’ balance. Second, the formation of the group also respects a regulatory framework, jointly defined by the FFR and the LNR, which notably states that players who participate in the Top 14 final are not eligible for selection for a summer tour. However, exceptions are possible and are currently being discussed with the LNR.”


So there’s a few things to take from that where it’s clear that the Top 14 fixtures are at the core of the issue. It appears that the 2000 minutes or 25 games parameters are likely to be part of the “regulatory framework, jointly defined by the FFR and the LNR” but it’s also clear that this has been considered alongside a bespoke analysis of each players situation, for the purposes of NZ tour selection, and NOT applied in a rigid and homogenous style. Factors including the level/intensity of matches played, timing of match load across the season, injury profile and date of season end will all have been reviewed, alongside many others no doubt.


The comparison with Englands experience is particularly relevant since it also highlights the current difference between the two countries’ league relationship with their union. The RFU have reached an (expensive) agreement with the GP that has taken many years to evolve and, critically, hands full season playing control of a designated group of 25 Test players to the England coach. The French agreements do not operate in the same way, where playing control sits with the clubs outside of the Test windows and this is key to the issues.


The difficulty for France however is that the Top 14 needs the weekend numbers that it needs and it’s not immediately clear how they can reduce them. The extension of their final has happened in conjunction with reducing 6N/AI overlap but they still haven’t managed to fully eliminate this. While it’s not clear how these issues can be easily or quickly resolved, it is very clear that the problem can not be simply defined as France disrespecting international rugby.

33 Go to comments
t
takata 1 hour ago
Can Les Bleus avoid a Black-wash in New Zealand?

The men at the beating heart of France’s first Test effort at Dunedin – number eight Guillard, the four half-backs [Le Garrec or Jauneau at nine, Segonds or Hastoy at 10], Fickou at 12 and Attissogbe at full-back] are all in imminent danger of playing over 2000 minutes, or over 30 games, or both. Overall, it is very hard to see what France is gaining in the player welfare equation. It is simply replacing one set of overworked players with another.

A very simple explanation is that, bar Joris Seconds at Bayonne, none of those players, Guillard (Lyon), Le Garrec (Racing), Hastoy (La Rochelle), Fickou (Racing) and Attissogbe (Pau) clocked much time during the highest level games of the club season which ended 7 days before the first test; their club didn’t qualify for the European Champions Cup final rounds and/or didn’t play the Top 14 play off.


So they all had quite a few off weekends that barely none of the first list could have enjoyed up to the end of June, except those injured or not in their prime. ie. Baille started only 5 games for Toulouse and 0 for France during the whole 2024-2025 season -explaining his stats- and it would have make no sense to send him over younger lads.


Joris Seconds (28), has a lot of game sheets, but shared all his game time at Nr. 10 with Camille Lopez (who is retired now); ie. he only clocked 108’ during his two last games in play off. He could also fully rest during the 6 Nations when Top 14 wasn’t playing.


Secondly, bar Mikaël Guillard, this second list was also made of players that weren’t used at all, or very little, during the whole 6 Nations. Guillard started 3/5 games and clocked 187’, Attissogbe 160’ - 2/2 start, Fickou 80’ - 1/1 start, Le Garrec 50’ - 0/3 start, plus a few more minutes by others.


Thirdly, it’s clear that Galthié wanted some preparation time and a full game (England A) before Dunedin. Most of his first 23 just did that as they ended their season on 7 June. His selection of 42 players was planned in 3 groups pending their availability: 28 + 9 + 5. Some players joined after the first group but could still make the game sheet at Dunedin because they were obviously needed.


But, as Galthié usually do, the first test team will rotate and very few will actually play all three tests (maybe Le Garrec & Seconds?). From what we know already, neither Guillard (@ 8) nor Villière (@ 11) will be on the next game sheet - so your projections on game time / game played are not worth the time you took to type them:


Here is the probable team for next test (with age and club):


Backs: Barré (22, Paris), Attissogbe (20, Pau), Depoortere (22, Bordeaux)

Centers: Barrassi (27, Toulouse), Gailleton (22, Pau)

Halfs: Seconds (28, Bayonne), Le Garrec (23, La Rochelle ex-Racing)

3rd Row: Van Tonder (27, Perpignan), Abadie (27, Toulon), Bochaton (24, Bordeaux)

2nd Row: Halagahu (23, Toulon), Brenan (23, Toulouse)

1st Row: Colombe (27, Toulouse ex-La Rochelle), Barlot (28, Castres), Erdocio (25, Montpellier)


Bench: Bourgarit (27, La Rochelle), Mallez (24, Toulouse/Aix), Montagne (24, Clermont), Taofifenua (34, Racing), Woki (26, Bordeaux ex-Racing), Vergnes-Taillefer (28, Bordeaux), Daubagna (31, Pau), Hastoy (28, La Rochelle).

33 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Les Kiss names full AUNZ squad to take on B&I Lions in Adelaide Full AUNZ squad named to take on B&I Lions in Adelaide
Search