'Asleep on the job' - English rugby chiefs torn to shreds by MPs
English rugby chiefs have been accused by MPs of overseeing “a failure on an epic scale” following the demise of Wasps and Worcester Warriors who have both entered administration with massive debts.
Bill Sweeney OBE, chief executive, Rugby Football Union and Simon Massie-Taylor, chief executive, Premiership Rugby Limited appeared before the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee today and faced stiff questioning about their parts in the “shambles” that has unfolded this season and reduced the Gallagher Premiership from 13 to 11 teams during the season.
Leading the widespread criticism was committee chair Julian Knight MP who told Massie-Taylor: "I have never come across anything as shambolic, lack of care and lack of thought towards people in your own game in my entire time as a select committee member.”
The committee chairman then accused Sweeney of being “asleep on the job” in checking the credentials of discredited Worcester owners Colin Goldring and Jason Whittingham. Sweeney replied, “I don’t accept that.”
Knight said: “How much financial support has the RFU given to support players and staff (at Worcester and Wasps)?”
Sweeney: “We don’t have the funds of financial support in that situation.”
Knight: “So, diddly squat, basically.
“You frankly have failed in this instance and so has the RFU. Should you not be looking at your own positions?”
The sharp exchange continued with a clearly frustrated Knight addressing Sweeney stating: “It looks to be as if you are living in isolation in some ivory tower without any intonation about what was going on. You are allowing someone (Goldring) who you later discover to have been banned by a major institution (SRA) to retain ownership of a rugby club and then you are not even banning them after they have driven it into the ground.
“How did you allow a liar and asset stripper to destroy a community club?”
Sweeney replied that the owners had gone through a fit and proper test in 2018 and passed but accepted there was currently no ongoing monitoring system and that this was one of the recommendations from “this sorry episode”, adding: “They certainly wouldn’t get through a fit and proper test now.”
Knight hit back: “So you lived in isolation while watching other clubs in other sports go under due to similar circumstances as Worcester and you were asleep on the job and so was your board.
“You are paid to ensure your clubs survive. Why have you failed in that?"
Sweeney defended the RFU against accusations from former CEO Francis Baron that it had run up huge debts insisting the next set of accounts that would be revealed shortly showed the Union was debt free. Sweeney said: “We have £126m in reserve including £90m from the CVC money and we are currently debt free. We expected to make £8m profit this year but we are going to break even. Our utility bills have increased from £2.2m to £7.5m.”
Carol Hart, chief executive, Worcester Warriors Foundation, gave evidence at an earlier sitting and accused English rugby chiefs of failing in their duties to look after the sport, telling the committee, "The governing bodies were sleepwalking through this entire nightmare and still do.”
She also revealed that a loss of the “P” share which could be bought back from Worcester by Premiership Rugby after administration would remove £70,000 of central funding for the Foundation. She insisted that heads of department at the club had voiced concerns over the owners for two years before the crisis came to a head. She also told the committee a total of 400 people were directly involved in the ramifications of administration at the club. Sweeney denied the RFU had been warned and promised to investigate this matter.
Local MP Robin Walker highlighted that Worcester had not had a finance director in place for the last two years and that fact “told a story” about the attitude of the owners. He also agreed with the committee chairman, that there had been “a failure of governance” of the sport.
MPs also took the Rugby Players Association to task over their ability to help those affected at Wasps and Worcester as the players’ organisation “had not been fit for purpose” to handle the ramifications of two clubs entering administration.
Knight said in his view that Wasps and Worcester had been left to “twist in the wind” and that the demise of both clubs would be the subject of a special report by the committee as the situation would be “laughable” if it wasn’t so tragic. He said: “I’m going to write to the Serious Fraud Office concerning Mr Colin Goldrings activities” and finished the meeting stating: “It all adds up to a failure on an epic scale.”
Latest Comments
Some interesting stats that just proved what my first impression of NZ’s drive to speed up Rugby Union would amount to - fine margins here and there to cut a few seconds off the game and nothing else. To do more there would have to be wholesale changes to the game like doing away with scrums, lineouts and bringing back the ELV’s to have free kicks instead of penalties. Very little chance of it happening but, in the end, Ruby Union would be a 15-man version of Rugby League. There are reasons why Rugby Union is globally more popular that Rugby League and what NZ are also not considering is the unintended consequences of what they want to achieve. This will end up turning Rugby Union into a low value product that will not be acceptable to the paying public. If people really wanted a sped-up version of rugby, then why is Rugby Union globally way more popular than Rugby League? Rugby lovers all over the world are also not stupid and have seen through what NZ are trying to achieve here, selfishly to bring back their glory days of dominance over every other nation and compete with Rugby League that is dominant in Australasia. NH countries just don’t have the cattle, or the fantastic weather needed to play like NZ SR franchises do so good luck to whoever has to try and convince the NH to accept going back to the days of NZ dominance and agreeing to wreck the game in the process. I have serious doubts on the validity of the TV stats presented by GP. All they did was expand the broadcasting base by putting it on free to air, not even any indication of arresting the continued drop in viewership. Match day attendance goes hand in hand with broadcast ratings so if there was an increase in the one you should expect to see it with the other. However, the drop in match day attendance is very evident to the casual highlights package viewer. The only club who looks to be getting solid attendance is the Drua. I am calling it now that NZ’s quest to speed up the game will fail and so will the vote on the 20-minute red card.
Go to commentsIt’s a good, timely wake up call for NZ Rugby (seem to be a few of them lately!) - sort out the bureaucratic nonsense at board level. We can’t expect to stay the number one option without keeping fans/players engaged. We’ve obviously been bleeding players to league for years but can’t let the floodgates open (although I think this headline is hyperbolic as it’s a result of a recent Warriors pathways system where they are tracking things more closely) Understand the need to focus boys on rugby if they’re at a proud rugby school too, don’t think it’s harsh at all re Barakat in Hamilton. Reward the committed players with squad positions. An elite 1st XV system in NZ has done more for league than they even realise, think it’s good to protect our game further.
Go to comments