Australia player ratings vs Springboks
Australia beat South Africa 23-18 in a scrappy game, with the Wallabies ending their losing streak.
However, neither team can be proud of their performance. Jan de Koning rates the Australia players.
15 Dane Haylett-Petty:
Was reasonable in the last line of defence and had some decent carries. However, his defence was less than acceptable.
5/10
14 Jack Maddocks:
Had limited opportunities and attack and struggled to make an impression with the ball in hand. Made a couple of tackles and won a turnover. Just acceptable.
6/10
13 Reece Hodge:
Kicked a monster, 55-metre, penalty just before half-time to make it a one-point game at the break. No real threat on attack, but made all his tackles.
6/10
12 Matt Toomua:
His reading of the game was sublime and he made an impressive 10 tackles, without slipping one.
7/10
11 Marika Koroibete:
Didn’t see any ball in the first half and became frustrated – getting involved in off-the-ball incidents. Had a few runs in the second half, but was found wanting on defence.
5/10
10 Kurtley Beale:
Good reading of the game, made great decisions and was accurate with the execution of his plays. Slipped a few tackles and conceded a penalty.
6/10
9 Will Genia:
Was accurate and made great decisions, keeping the Bok defence guessing throughout the game. His service was crisp Did miss a couple of tackles, but the most influential player in the game.
8/10
8 Pete Samu:
Sometimes you wonder what coaches see in players. His workrate was poor for a No.8 and slipped tackles.
4/10
7 Michael Hooper (captain):
He was busy on defence and had a handful of carries, but his constant harping makes him look like a frustrated ‘old man’.
6/10
6 Lukhan Tui:
Australia’s most impressive forward – a tackle count in the double figures and also making ground with the ball in hand on several occasions.
7/10
5 Izack Rodda:
Made all his tackles and worked hard at the breakdown. Even stole a Bok line-out.
6/10
4 Rory Arnold:
Great early line-out steal, five metres from his own line, but ran out of puff and his workrate dropped.
5/10
3 Allan Alaalatoa:
Solid in the early scrums, but a poor workrate and his discipline is an issue.
5/10
2 Tatafu Polota-Nau:
Was reasonable in the first half, before he was replaced just past the half-hour mark. Made some great tackles and won a couple of turnovers. Came back on inside the last 10 minutes.
5/10
1 Scott Sio:
Under pressure in the scrums and conceded a penalty. Made a handful of tackles.
5/10
Continue reading below...
Video: Cheika and Hooper discuss win over Springboks
Replacements:
16 Folau Fainga’a (on for Polota-Nau, 34th min):
His line-out throwing was shocking and his workrate poor.
4/10
17 Tom Robertson (on for Sio, 70th min):
Not enough time to be rated.
18 Taniela Tupou (on for Alaalatoa, 48th min):
He was under pressure in the scrums, missed as many tackles as he made and conceded a penalty.
4/10
19 Rob Simmons (on for Rodda, 42nd min):
Made a handful of tackles and cleaned a few rucks. Conceded a penalty. Pretty average.
5/10
20 Ned Hanigan (on for Arnold, 77th min):
Not enough time to be rated.
21 Joe Powell:
Not used.
22 Bernard Foley (on for Maddocks, 62nd min):
No impact on the game, other than a few tackles.
4/10
23 Tom Banks (on for Hodge, 69th min):
Not enough time to be rated.
SOURCE: @rugby365com
Latest Comments
I was introduced to crypto investment by an investor I met on Telegram. I liked the program and decided to join the investment platform. At the beginning, I invested and made profits which I continued doing until the website disappeared. I could not withdraw any funds before the incident happened but luckily a friend of mine that works with FBI introduced me to ( WALLET CONNECT (AT) USA (.) C O M) WhatsApp +(1 (412) 225‑ 5918 ) and they came just in time and assisted me to recover all the money. They did a great job and they were very professional to work with. It's quite unbelievable but it happened. We got our money back through their system assistance.
Go to commentsYes that’s what WR needs to look at. Football had the same problem with european powerhouses getting all the latin talent then you’re gaurenteed to get the odd late bloomer (21/22 etc, all the best footballers can play for the country much younger to get locked) star changing his allegiance.
They used youth rep selection for locking national elifibilty at one point etc. Then later only counted residency after the age of 18 (make clubs/nations like in this case wait even longer).
That’s what I’m talking about, not changing allegiance in rugby (were it can only be captured by the senior side), where it is still the senior side. Oh yeah, good point about CJ, so in most cases we probably want kids to be able to switch allegiance, were say someone like Lemoto could rep Tonga (if he wasn’t so good) but still play for Australia’s seniors, while in someone like Kite’s (the last aussie kid to go to France) case he’ll be French qualified via 5 years residency at the age of 21, so France to lock him up before Aussie even get a chance to select him. But if we use footballs regulations, who I’m suggesting WR need to get their a into g replicating, he would only start his 5 years once he turns 18 or whatever, meaning 23 yo is as soon as anyone can switch, and when if they’re good enough teams like NZ and Aus can select them (France don’t give a f, they select anybody just to lock them).
Go to comments