Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Australia player ratings vs France | eToro Series

Taniela Tupou. (Photo by Jason O'Brien / www.photosport.nz)

The Wallabies came agonisingly close to securing a series clinching victory against the French at AAMI Stadium in Melbourne last night, however were narrowly defeated 28-26 in an enthralling encounter.

ADVERTISEMENT

Wallabies head coach Dave Rennie would not have been enthused by his side’s inability to start well, as again they found themselves chasing the game, only taking the lead at 26-25 in the 75th minute.

The French capitlaised on a scrum penalty just two minutes later, taking the three points and ensuring a memorable 28-26 victory, their first over the Wallabies on Australian soil since 1990.

Here’s how the Wallabies rated:

1. James Slipper – 7/10
The veteran Wallaby prop had the ascendency in the set piece and was fearless when defending the line. Yet despite his bravery in that facet of play, was prone to falling off the odd tackle. Still a very positive performance.

2. Brandon Paenga-Amosa – 6.5
Really worked himself hard in defence, yet a misread off a Jake Gordon box kick opened the door for the French to attack whilst deep in Australian territory – Les Bleus eventually coming away with yet another 3 points. His set piece was essentially sound despite a poor lineout when the Wallabies were well on the offensive.

3. Taniela Tupou – 7.5
Was, as expected, a handful for the French in the set piece and with ball-in-hand, yet what impressed most was his footwork late before contact, allowing himself to maximise his impact in attack. Furthermore, his vision to send a cut out pass to Gordon for the halfback’s try was one for the ages.

4. Matt Philip – 6.5
A far better performance this week than last. Caused the French some issues in the lineout and generally worked himself hard around the park, yet appears to be lacking in the physicality he showed in 2020. Will need to find that if Australia are going to defeat France on Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

5. Lukhan Salakaia-Loto – 7
Worked tirelessly in defence, yet his ball security into contact at times was questionable. What impressed was he didn’t go missing when the physicality got turned up in the second half.

6. Rob Valetini – 7.5
Defensive weapon for the Wallabies last night. When he hits, he rarely misses and the tackled player stays hit. Was strong in his carries and overall had a very credible test.

7. Michael Hooper (c) – 8
The Wallabies best forward on the park, if not player. His work at the ruck on several occasions relived pressure for his side. A memorable covering tackle on Baptiste Couilloud most certainly thwarted a French scoring opportunity several phases later. This, coupled with his own try late in the match, illustrated what a complete player he is.

8. Harry Wilson – 7.5
He played ‘Big’ against a large French pack and never took a backwards step. In the second half looked to hit the space more often and caused the French some issues there, however his defence was epic, repelling a number of French raids on the Australian line.

ADVERTISEMENT

9. Jake Gordon – 7
A much better performance this week. He threatened from the base several times; however, his passing game was not as always as accurate as the side needed. Furthermore, the French employed a number of ‘slow-down’ tactics around the base of the Australian ruck that Gordon should have highlighted to the referee.

10. Noah Lolesio – 7
A solid performance by Lolesio – in him, the Wallabies appear to have found a consistent goal kicker. He varied up the attack when the French were pressing hard on the outside, however, he needs to look to get more second touches in attack as he appears quite dangerous with ball in hand. There were opportunities for that to occur last night, yet he appeared more concerned about being in the right position for the next phase.

11. Marika Koroibete – 8
The best Wallaby back on the night and certainly vying for best player honours with skipper Hooper. He threatened every time he had the ball, be it out wide, or looking for work in tight., He was courageous taking the high ball and ran at the French with great gusto. Felt for him as he appeared to have scored a brilliant try early on that was rightfully disallowed after a Tom Wright knock on in the lead up.

12. Matt To’omua – 6.5
Had a fair crack and had the very hard task of aiming up against a staunch French midfield. Made a few basic errors but was the experienced midfield advisor the Wallabies required to ensure the lesser experienced Lolesio and Paisami had some experience around them.

13. Hunter Paisami – 7
Strong as ever into contact, and looked to also exploit the gaps as opposed to simply seeking direct contact. His ball security was still an issue at times, but despite this he did cause the French some concern both in the inside and wider channels. A fair effort.

14. Tom Wright – 5.5
A talented player who appears down on confidence. His option-taking in possession wasn’t always the soundest and he appears to let the ball control him, rather than controlling the ball himself. Best advice is to simply be more decisive, as his indecision at times is proving costly.

15. Tom Banks – 6
Had some moments of attacking brilliance, yet also had a few questionable moments to balance that out. Hasn’t yet put in a performance to cement himself as the Wallabies No 15.

Replacements: 

16. Lachlan Lonergan – 5.5
His inexperience appeared to cost the Wallabies an attacking opportunity when he went solo down the short side on an attacking maul and was quickly isolated, costing the Wallabies valuable momentum.

17. Angus Bell – 6
Had some quality involvements but will come under criticism for the scrum penalty in the 78th minute that allowed the French to take the lead. However, he has a case that the French were pushing before the ball was put in, but thems-the-breaks.

18. Allan Alaalatoa – 7.5
Superb impact. Really looked to impose himself on the match, particularly in defence when he put in some serious shots on some of the French forwards.

19. Darcy Swain – 6.5
Came on and looked to impose himself as required.

20. Isi Naisarani – 6
Had some quality touches but his accuracy at the breakdown appears to be an issue that isn’t yet resolved. Certainly wasn’t a passenger on the night.

21. Tate McDermott – 6.5
Looked busy and was trying feverishly to get his side back in the match. Will probably get an opportunity to start next week and stake his claim as Australia’s first choice halfback.

22. Len Ikitau – 6.5
Came on for his debut and had some quality touches out wide. Certainly appears to have the makings of a test player.

23. Andrew Kellaway – 6.5
Came on for Wright and appeared comfortable with test match rugby. His support play and offload ensured Hooper’s try. I suspect he will get a start this weekend in the decider.

ADVERTISEMENT

HSBC SVNS Singapore 2025 | Day Two Men's Highlights

HSBC SVNS Singapore 2025 | Day Two Women's Highlights

Jet Lag: The biggest challenge facing international sports? | The Report

Boks Office | Episode 39 | The Investec Champions Cup is back

Rugby’s Greatest Rivalry? | New Zealand & Australia | Sevens Wonders | Episode 5

Kobelco Kobe Steelers vs Toshiba Brave Lupus Tokyo | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

The Rise of Kenya | The Report

The Fixture: How This Rugby Rivalry Has Lasted 59 Years

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 27 minutes ago
How key Waratahs playmakers could reshape Joe Schmidt's Wallabies backline

Yeah like a classic comedy show, not too different to how he went at the same venue last year? Perhaps there’s something about that latitude that puts his equilibrium off?


The rush on Jo was fine though, you’d catch most players out with Dmacs ex3cution of it. There were actually quite a few instances like that, not too dissimilar to that Bledisloe game actually, were things just didn’t work out for no luck of trying to skill. I laughed when Dmac took himself out of that try and basically gifted it to them by trying to bowl over Kellaway was perhaps the most comical.


Actually now you say that, yes, very reminiscent of Aus v England wasn’t it. The two changes at halves have been instrumental for me. Not that the first two weren’t playing well, but these two seem to pair up better, with everyone. Like you say with those sorts of counter attack plays, they are on instinct and that stuff needs to be shared with everyone. That’s another thing too I was thinking, in that respect guys returning can be a hinderance to a team playing well, but I might have just thought that because I wasn’t sure (hadn’t seen much) which of NSWs midfields were best suited where.


I’m very similar in my TMO preference as well. I had actually said to myself several times already this season (SR here) that they are pretty bullish basically telling the ref what theyve seen as fact. If I remember rightly it even happened a few times in November and some of the refs then said “no, I’m actually happy with that.” etc. But very tough on Maybe (I think) who probably has plss poor vision on the big screen to say anything otherwise, so yes, definitely just make it an offer to look and also communicate ‘why’ precisely to the ref, and (just like he does to the players) he can even say to the TMO “no I was happy how I saw it live, I don’t need a replay thanks” etc. He started like that I think, “I’d like to review a simultaneous grounding” but then yes, he took over after. Of course in the refs minds, it’s the right call, thoughts how it’s always been ref’d, even when theres a good few frames in the slowmo that actually show ball obviously hitting grass first (which they didn’t in this game), they’ve always ruled that (like in cricket) if the ball continues to then be ground on the line after (or in the same frame in this example) they always gone ‘dead ball’. The new SR committee apparently what to making the line the attacking teams so they award the try’s instead of taking them away, but just like I said with them not wanting to look closely at the first forward pass (like they did for the Chiefs try), I don’t want random JRLO level decisions, and giving the line to the attacking team is just going to make clear no trys, a try instead. It’s exactly the same result.

38 Go to comments
t
tonirobinson362 1 hour ago
Geoff Parling: An Englishman roasting the Lions?

A few weeks ago, I came across a YouTube ad that stopped me in my tracks. It looked like a live broadcast of Elon Musk announcing Tesla’s “exclusive crypto project.” The production was flawless, professional, convincing, and eerily realistic. His voice, expressions, mannerisms everything matched what you’d expect from a real Tesla livestream.The ad promised massive returns if you “joined the project” by sending Bitcoin to a wallet address. I was skeptical at first, but the countdown timer, skyrocketing charts, and Elon’s confident pitch chipped away at my doubt. Eventually, I gave in. I sent $8,000 worth of BTC, thinking I was getting in early on a groundbreaking initiative.But just a few hours later, something didn’t sit right. I checked Tesla’s official channels. No mention of any crypto project. My stomach dropped.I rushed to a blockchain explorer and looked up the wallet address I’d sent the funds to. What I saw confirmed my worst fears: my BTC was being split and moved rapidly across multiple wallets in a process known as “smurfing,” a common money laundering technique. I had been scammed.In desperation, I searched for help and came acrossCHAINTRACE ASSET RECOVERYa blockchain forensics firm. Honestly, I didn’t expect much but I reached out anyway. To my surprise, they responded quickly and took my case seriously. Their team began tracking the funds in real time, tracing the flow of my BTC through a web of wallets.Incredibly, they managed to link the stolen funds to a wallet connected to an account on Finance, one of the world’s largest crypto exchanges.They didn’t waste a second. Within 48 hours, CHAINTRACE ASSET RECOVERYhad coordinated with Binance’s security team, who were able to freeze the scammer’s account before the funds could be withdrawn or laundered further.A few days later, the impossible happened the full $8,000 was returned to me.Even now, I can hardly believe it. I went from being scammed by a deepfake crypto con to getting every dollar back, all thanks to the quick action and expertise of CHAINTRACE ASSET RECOVERY.If you’ve fallen victim to a crypto scam, don’t give up. Get help immediately. Time is critical, and with CHAINTRACE ASSET RECOVERY,recovery is possible.  

WHATSAPP : ‪‪+1 (581) 256‑1989‬‬

TELEGRAM : ‪https://t.me/CHAINTRACE_ASSET_RECOVERY‬ WEBSITE ‪https://chaintraceassetrecovery.com

44 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Despite the Croke Park horror show, Marcus Smith shouldn't be discounted from Lions conversation Despite the Croke Park horror show, Marcus Smith shouldn't be discounted from Lions conversation
Search