Back where he belongs: Why Damian McKenzie needs to stay at fullback
It should be no surprise to anyone that the two games that the Chiefs haven't lost this year are games of which their playmaking maestro Damian McKenzie has been playing at fullback.
It's a position that the 23-year-old has made a big impression in since bursting onto the Super Rugby scene with the Chiefs in 2015, and despite the club's best efforts to play him as a first-five to fill the void left by veteran pivot Aaron Cruden in 2017, it's fullback where he's proving to be most valuable.
The Chiefs' horrendous start to the season followed by two much-improved performances against the Hurricanes and Bulls illustrates the impact McKenzie can make when switched from 10 to 15.
He missed their tight season-opening defeat at the hands of the Highlanders in Hamilton through injury, but when he returned to the starting side for their clash against the Brumbies in Canberra, he wasn't able to turn his side's fortunes around as they stumbled to a record 54-17 defeat.
What followed was a first-ever loss to the Sunwolves on Kiwi soil a week later, before being pumped 57-28 by the Crusaders in Christchurch.
McKenzie played in all three of those humiliating fixtures, starting every time at first-five.
In recent seasons, he has built a reputation for himself as someone who can set a match alight from nothing with a sudden burst through the opposition's defensive line using his sharp footwork and lightning speed.
For a professional rugby player as small as him - standing at 1.77m and 78kg - he needs those attributes in order to survive on the field, and when playing in the right position, he utilises those attributes to thrive and standout to not only make him one of the most exciting players to watch in Super Rugby, but also one of the most important players at the Chiefs.
Unfortunately for the Chiefs, McKenzie was not being played in the right position in those three games against the Brumbies, Sunwolves and Crusaders.
Sure, he has the playmaking ability to sufficiently direct his side throughout Super Rugby as a first-five, but if the Chiefs really wanted to capitalise on the talents that McKenzie can offer them, then they needed to play him at fullback where he could have made the most of broken defensive lines on the counter-attack and the open pasture in front of him further out in the backline.
Playing much further in-field at first-five significantly restricted McKenzie's capacity to run with as much freedom and impulsiveness compared to when he's playing fullback, such is the nature of the first-five position where he is confronted with much more traffic in a lot tighter spaces.
Without that freedom while in possession of the ball, McKenzie's strengths were not being played to, and the Chiefs subsequently suffered for it in the opening month of Super Rugby.
However, with the Chiefs reaching crisis point in round five with no wins on the board as they prepared to host the star-studded Hurricanes, head coach Colin Cooper made the critical change which saw McKenzie move to fullback.
He won't have regretted that shift, as the Chiefs are now two games undefeated following a 23-23 draw with the Hurricanes and 56-20 thumping of the Bulls in Pretoria last weekend.
There is no doubt that McKenzie's positional switch played a big role in the Chiefs' turnaround, as is reflected in his match statistics.
"6016778003001"]
Latest Comments
Steve Borthwick appointment was misguided based on two flawed premises.
1. An overblown sense of the quality of the premiership rugby. The gap between the Premiership and Test rugby is enormous
2. England needed an English coach who understood English Rugby and it's traditional strengths.
SB won the premiership and was an England forward and did a great job with the Japanese forwards but neither of those qualify you as a tier 1 test manager.
Maybe Felix Jones and Aled Walter's departures are down to the fact that SB is a details man, which work at club level but at test level you need the manager to manage and let the coaches get on and do what they are employed for.
SB criticism of players is straight out of Eddie Jones playbook but his loyalty to keeping out of form players borne out of his perceived sense of betrayal as a player.
In all it doesn't stack up as the qualities needed to be a modern Test coach /Manager
Go to commentsBut still Australians. Only Australia can help itself seems to be the key message.
Blaming Kiwis is deflecting from the actual problem.
Go to comments