1
Barrett moving after Rugby World Cup
By Online Editors
By NZ Herald
Beauden Barrett hasn't yet committed to the Blues, but the world's best play-maker has said yes to living in Auckland and will be relocating after the World Cup.
The Herald understands that Barrett and his wife, Hannah, are upping sticks from the capital later this year to base themselves in Auckland which is why the Blues are hopeful they are going to lure the All Blacks No 10 from the Hurricanes.
Barrett, whose father played for the Hurricanes, has been fiercely loyal to the club he first played for in 2011.
But as much as the Hurricanes are in his blood, Barrett will have to commit to commuting between Auckland and Wellington if he is to continue to play for them beyond his current contract which expires at the end of this Super Rugby campaign.
Complicating the picture is that Barrett is understood to be planning to take both a non-playing and playing sabbatical as part of a four-year contract extension to stay in New Zealand.
It is probable that he will be granted permission to take an extended break from all rugby after the World Cup and miss much of next year's Super Rugby season.
Continue reading below
Scotty Stevenson & Ali Williams discuss the Blues
He's expected to play in the latter weeks of the competition and be available for the July tests and Rugby Championship before then joining a Japanese club at the end of the year, where he will be based until May 2021.
It is, in essence, a similar deal to the one Brodie Retallick has been granted in that like the big Chiefs lock, Barrett is being afforded an 18-month window in which to enjoy a combination of time off and a lucrative spell in Japan before fully committing to New Zealand in May 2021.
And like Retallick, Barrett is effectively going to miss the next two Super Rugby competitions, which further complicates the question of which club he'll play for.
If he does decide to join the Blues, it may be he delays his arrival until the 2022 season.
There is still, though, despite Barrett's decision to relocate to Auckland, no certainty that he'll commit to the Blues given the lack of success the club has enjoyed and the obvious lack of quality they have in key positions other than first-five.
And while it would be a major snub if Barrett opted to live in Auckland but not play for the Blues, he wouldn't be the first to do just that.
Daniel Carter lived in Auckland throughout the last two years of his time in New Zealand, but opted to commute back and forth to Christchurch to remain with the Crusaders.
What the Blues will be hoping is that Barrett decides that the impact on his family life and subsequent physical and mental state will be too heavily compromised by constantly traveling between Auckland and Wellington and that he concludes the sacrifice of staying loyal to the Hurricanes is too great to make.
He's not expected to reveal his plans until after the Hurricanes' Super Rugby season has finished.
That could be this weekend and the All Blacks coaches will no doubt be keen for him to have his future signed before he comes into camp for the Rugby Championship in mid-July.
This article first appeared on nzherald.co.nz, written by Gregor Paul and is republished with permission
In other news: Nations Championship plans scrapped
Trending on RugbyPass
2
Wallaroos captain reflects on Black Ferns’ success with sevens stars
3
Springboks flyhalf's latest injury worry
4
Initial Immanuel Feyi-Waboso injury update does not sound promising
5
Latest Comments
I think it was a better rugby destination for him.
He was developed in Melbourne and had a relatively brief stint there. I think he was possibly dropped out of the squad for the return of someone like To'omua (also a Melbourne local) in 2019 ahead of the RWC. But then he wasn't picked up by another Australian team and went to play in Japan when he only really seemed to play a hat full of top level games (maybe injured for long periods??) before he went on to Scotland. But it was only in Scotland that he started to get a lot of consistent game time and selection.
The thing is, no one talked about him being a missed opportunity in Australia before he left - a little like Mac Hansen. But he has been able to forge a top level career since leaving. Both men only had a handful (5 or 6?) games at Super Rugby level before they made a decision to leave (or had it made for them I suppose). Other countries have gone on to develop them and that is great for them and it is probably good for the global game as it means the best players are rising to the top - if not in their birth country than in another. I think there are a lot of issues with poor player development in Australia but I don't know if these two blokes are very good examples of it.
Go to commentsOk I understand. Give them my number please Nick.
Go to comments