1
Billy Vunipola booed and PA system plays 'It's Raining Men' following Saracens' loss to Bristol Bears
By Ian Cameron
Billy Vunipola was booed today on his first on-field appearance since defending controversial Wallaby Israel Folau on Instagram.
The big number 8 was given the bird every time he touched the ball as Saracens suffered a shock defeat to the struggling Bristol Bears at Ashton Gate.
The 15,000 strong crowd were clearly aware of the unfolding controversy and used it to mercilessly rib Vunipola. The PA also appeared to join in, blasting 'It's Raining Men' over the loudspeakers at full time.
The controversy over Vunipola failed to detract from a remarkable win for the Bears, who secured a win with a 81st minute Ian Madigan kick, which sent the stadium into hysterics at the final whistle.
The win lifts the Bears 11 points clear of the bottom-placed Newcastle Falcons, who themselves suffered a loss to fellow bottom dwellers Leicester Tigers.
The booing of the heretofore popular England star is the latest development in the unfolding controversy surrounding Folau and players like Vunipola who appear to support him.
On Friday Harlequins prop Joe Marler’s took to goading Vunipola on Twitter over his support of Folau.
The former England prop had first taken aim directly at Folau after the controversy broke over the Wallaby’s star most recent homophobic outbursts on social media – sending the fullback a picture of two men kissing.
Yesterday he turned his addition to Vunipola, who has been pilloried for his support of Folau’s anti-gay Instagram message. In an apparent defence of his fellow Christian’s view, Vunipola has liked Folau’s post and states on his own account that “Man was made for woman to procreate that was the goal no?”
“I’m not perfect I’m at least everything on that list at least at one point in my life. It hurts to know that. But that’s why I believe there’s a God.”
In reference to one of the ‘sins’ on the list, Marler tweeted a picture of Vunipola stumbling drunk out of a nightclub in Dublin.
Vunipola could face disciplinary action in response to the anti-gay position outlined in his post, although initially his England bosses are seeking talks.
“Rugby is an inclusive sport and we do not support these views. We will be meeting with Billy to discuss his social media posts,” an RFU spokeswoman said.
Saracens have subsequently issued a statement saying that Vunipola’s comments are “inconsistent” with the club’s beliefs and that internal discipline procedures will follow, however it appears that Vunipola’s activity have already had repercussions, with Channel 4 dropping Vunipola as the face of their European rugby coverage.
A spokesperson for Channel 4 has said that “(Billy Vunipola)’s views are incompatible with our values as an inclusive broadcaster and in light of this Billy Vunipola won’t be used as a contributor in Channel 4’s rugby coverage.”
The drama has also been the subject of humourous mischief makers on Twitter, not least this effort from comedian Simon O'Keefe.
Trending on RugbyPass
2
Ex-Ireland wing brands Six Nations champs 'not that good'
3
Hacjivah Dayimani exits SA following Springbok snub
4
Saracens statement: The outcome of Billy Vunipola investigation
5
Latest Comments
Actually the era defining moment came a few years earlier. February 2002 to be precise, when Michael D Higgins as finance minister at the time introduced his sports persons tax relief bill to the dial. As the politicians of the day stated “It seems to be another daft K Club frolic born in Kildare amongst the well-paid professional jockeys with whom the Minister plays golf” and that the scheme represented “a savage uncaring vision of Ireland and one that should be condemned”. The irfu and Leinster would be nowhere near the position they are in today without this key component of the finances.
Go to commentsIt is crystal clear that people who make such threats on line should be tried and imprisoned. Those with responsibility in social media companies who don’t facilitate this should be convicted. In real life, I have free speech to approach someone like Reinach and verbally threaten him. I am risking a conviction or a slap but I could do it. In the old days, If someone anonymously threatened someone by letter the police would ask and use evidence from the postal system. Unlike the Post, social media companies have complete instant and legal access to the content in social media. They make money from the data, billions. Yet, they turn a blind eye to terrorism, Nazi-ism and industrial levels of threats against individuals including their address and childrens schools being published online all from ananoymous accounts not real speech. They claim free speech. The fault is with the perps but also social media companies who think anonymous personas posting death threats constitutes free speech.
Go to comments