Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Blues get season back on track with thrilling win over Hurricanes

Patrick Tuipulotu of the Blues on attack during the round three Super Rugby Pacific match between Hurricanes and Blues at Sky Stadium, on March 01, 2025, in Wellington, New Zealand. (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

After starting their title defence in Super Rugby Pacific with back-to-back losses, the Blues have finally taken their place within the winners circle after overcoming the Hurricanes 33-29 in a New Zealand derby classic at Wellington’s Sky Stadium.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Blues had started their season with losses to the Chiefs in Auckland and the Highlanders down south in Dunedin, while the Hurricanes were looking to go record their second successive win after surviving a scare against the Fijian Drua last time out.

With thousands of Wellingtonian rugby fans watching on, the Blues had the first chance to strike at the famed ‘Cake Tin’ after referee Angus Gardner awarded a penalty. While the posts were well within range, the Aucklanders set their sights on seven instead of the three on offer.

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

Eight forwards in blue jerseys lined up next to their North Island-rivals in yellow with the try line within reach. Former Hurricane Ricky Riccitelli threw into the lineout, but the ambitious attempt at points didn’t lead to a change on the scoreboard, with the scores stuck at nil-all.

The Hurricanes wouldn’t make the same decision a few minutes later after they were awarded a penalty of their own inside the Blues’ half. First five-eighth Harry Godfrey stepped up and nailed the shot at goal to give the hosts an early lead, much to the delight of the faithful watching on.

But the Hurricanes’ poor discipline wasn’t helping their cause to remain in front. The men from New Zealand’s windy capital gave away four of the first five penalties, which led to props Xavier Numia and Pouri Rakete-Stones receiving yellow cards.

Rakete-Stones had quite literally just come on the field as a replacement for Numia for a scrum, but a penalty try infringement saw the prop sit down for 10. The Blues also took the lead with that effort, but more drama followed soon after.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rieko Ioane was shown a yellow as well, with the Blues playing with 14 men against the Canes’ 13. Still, the Hurricanes chose not to roll the dice once again, with Godfrey knocking over another penalty goal from close range.

The scoreboard read 7-6 to the Blues after 22 minutes.

Match Summary

5
Penalty Goals
0
2
Tries
5
2
Conversions
3
0
Drop Goals
0
151
Carries
81
6
Line Breaks
4
7
Turnovers Lost
10
4
Turnovers Won
4

2016 Super Rugby-winning Hurricane Riccitelli was next to score, with the now-Blues hooker reaping the rewards of a telling burst up the field from captain Patrick Tuipulotu. Riccitelli ran onto a pop pass from the lock and wasn’t going to be denied from such close range.

This New Zealand derby continued to entertain viewers with point-scoring drama, as Godfrey sliced through a gaping hole in the Blues’ defensive line to cross just four minutes after Riccitelli’s earlier effort for the Blues.

ADVERTISEMENT

Backrower Cameron Suafoa scored one more try for the Blues before the half was done, while two late penalty goals from Godfrey ensured the Hurricanes would only trail by two points when the second-half got underway.

After an opening 40 minutes with plenty of points, the next quarter was a tense war.

Defence was king for both sides, who worked tirelessly to keep the other out.

Winger Kini Naholo would eventually score in the 59th minute to give the Hurricanes the lead, with Godfrey converting the try. Godfrey would also sneak a penalty inside the left upright shortly after to give the Canes a 29-21 lead with less than 20 to play.

With time against them, the Blues had to score next. They had a penalty awarded in their favour inside the Hurricanes’ 22, but Hoskins Sotutu took a quick tap instead, with the powerful backrower diving over in the second phase.

Beauden Barrett added the extras to make it a one-point game.

But, unfortunately for the Canes, that’s when the Blues hit their stride.

It all started with Barrett, who broke up the field before finding Caleb Clarke on the left edge. In the second phase, Barrett and AJ Lam spread the ball towards the right touchline, with winger Mark Tele’a diving in the corner to give the defending champions the lead.

With just four points separating the teams, another spanner was thrown into the mix with Sotutu leading the field after receiving a yellow card under review. The Blues held the lead, but the match’s momentum had swung in the Hurricanes’ favour.

The Canes had an attacking lineout 10 metres out from the try line, with former England loose forward Brad Shields taking the ball. After another penalty against the Blues, the home side chose to kick for the sideline again with less than two minutes to play.

Du’Plessis Kirifi would end up knocking the ball on.

The Blues held on for a tough win to get their season back on track.

But it’s not all good news for Vern Cotter’s team, with Sotutu’s yellow card being upgraded to a red, which could have ramifications for the weeks ahead.

ADVERTISEMENT

KOKO Show | July 8th | Bernard Foley stops by to talk the Wallabies winning and Lions being tested

England v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Georgia vs Ireland | Men’s International | Full Match Replay

Lions Share | Episode 2

Chile vs Romania | Men’s International | Full Match Replay

USA vs Belgium | Men’s International | Full Match Replay

Touchdown in Dublin, The Red Sea Returns & We Prepare to Face Argentina | Ep 2: The Ultimate Test

South Africa v British & Irish Lions | 2009 | Second Test | The Vaults

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Can Les Bleus avoid a Black-wash in New Zealand?

-last season was a RWC season, which always means more games

I didn’t look at every (in fact I only looked at NZ lol) body but it actually means less games

(especially the Munster ones)

Yes quite noticeable, and that if Leinster and Toulouse are a mirror, didn’t the Toulousian stars still have higher minutes?

Could Doris’ last longer season have an impact on his injury

Good question, he had 1383 from 19 through till that point. No idea what his injury was but that’s a good amount of minutes again, his replacement had 5 more URC matches following the injury, you could predict 5-600 more minutes on top (another full load). I’d say yes it could and no it probably didn’t lol

looked at the ones that had the highest figures. The numbers in the season before and the one after are usually different.

Yes and it would be very easy to check thanks to that great site (just middle mouse every player). Certainly I noted the ones in Lions are less. Maybe that is planned as they have 5 or so more games yet but could indeed be seasonal. It just too hard to know imo and taking a basic average is enough. I suppose they have 10 more Lions games from the point of that data and if you expect them to share minutes thats 5x1200 added, making a season ending 23 likely totalling 42k minutes, much higher than the previous years.

If players are tired with no gas, get injured and miss half of the next season, that’s not a good input for a game

Yeah totally, that is a holistic season to season picture though, we are talking about a single key tour during a 4 WC cycle.

players from the C team were.. or are injured … so that quite conveniently lowers the bar, while still being unrealistic, as they would not tour anyway

Yes I have brought up that point myself too, it could have been much different, as it’s only “Unrealistic” judging by the example Galthie set in his selections. Who numbers, maybe he had some theoretical/imaginary marker where he said “if I can get enough players to cross this point, I’ll risk selecting my best available to try and win” but because too many became unavailable he decided it wasn’t worth it/couldn’t reach the quality he thought needed to win, so decide to go development instead.

348 Go to comments
T
TT 2 hours ago
Jason Ryan unpacks selection changes and their future impact

AB forward pack solidifying & experimenting nicely. Yes need all combinations, including back ups, tested & solidified asap.


The backline's down the other end of the spectrum, from 9 back ups to wings is all up in the air. Mainly because to many have been given too many chances to prove themselves for too long, ie while NZ other backline riches languish… or move to Japan, eg the 1 thing that has to be stopped, if it can, is NZ's most powerful centre, & exactly what ABs need, move to Japan, ie Peter Umaga-Jensen.


Add backline talent like Fakatava, D.McKenzie (permanently), Josh Jacomb, Tavatavanaw, Q.Tupaea, again Peter Umaga-Jensen, Billy Proctor, AJ Lam, Narawa, Tangitau, Naholo


This is the AB squad & team to win every future test, including the next RWC.


Order in preference /{1st pick}/ [ONJ=Once Not Injured ] / (back up)


1 {De Groot} [ONJ - Williams, Tu’ungafasi] Ollie Norris


2 { Taylor } Taukei’aho [ONJ - Aumua]


3 {Tosi} [ONJ - Lomax ] (Newell )


4,5 Locks {[ONJ - S.Barrett], Holland, Tuipulotu }, ( Vaa’i , Antonio Shalfoon, Isaia Walker-Leawere, [ONJ - Oliver Haig] )


6,7,8 Loose forwards { A.Savea, [ONJ - Lakai, Sititi], Finau, Kirifi } (Christian Lio-Willie, Vaa’i )


9 {Roigard } Ratima (Fakatava)


10 {D.McK} B.Barrett (Josh Jacomb)


12 {Tavatavanawai} Q.Tupaea (Billy Proctor)


13 { Peter Umaga-Jensen} Billy Proctor (AJ Lam)


11, 14 { W.Jordan, Narawa } [ONJ - Tangitau, Naholo] (Reece , C.Clarke)


15 {J.Barrett} B.Barrett (Love)

2 Go to comments
J
JW 3 hours ago
Can Les Bleus avoid a Black-wash in New Zealand?

Common now, I checked, and I have also seen your replies to Graham just now. You know the AB tests rated higher. A ‘Friendly’! You know they go back in history even further, right?


So I can’t believe you are correct when you say it brings in the money. I can understand though playing better nations than those in the 6N but which don’t have a profile (like how Argentina is still a hard rate in NZ even after years of high performance), don’t generate the same interest as Wales etc. You’re also not going to have a SA or a NZ touring every November, and Wallabies are no longer the benchmark.


I mean I wouldn’t doubt that the most obvious revenue factor is a 6N component, not trying to say that it isn’t, just that fans show that it needn’t be. November test should still generate a high amount of revenue. As a topic it is all redundant now as the November tests (and July) are going to have a competitive factor.


Hopefully the quality of nations continue to rise and you can have three blockbuster teams touring every year in the not too distant future. 10 or 11 games might be right around the perfect number for a minimum tier 1 test nation too. I’m sure you’re going to make the rest of your season fit around that (those aren’t 100% things at all).


So although WR have already implemented change, I do still agree with your opinion that things are pretty good as they are. I only see a little improvement needed before France can really step up to All Blacks or Springbok level. You might think that a joke and that you will always look up to these teams but as a nation you really can do/go one better.

348 Go to comments
J
JW 3 hours ago
Can Les Bleus avoid a Black-wash in New Zealand?

It was a reply to both your posts sorry, I mean stuff you replied to NB about only focusing on 6N and hoping that.. narrowness will benefit a WC campaign.


I think WCs are harder to win than that (requires many factors other than being able to play the best winning rugby), and 5 matches that aren’t must win and are broken up is not a good test (especially compared what the All Blacks offered).

I’m fully aware that French International players participation into Top 14, European Cups & 6 Nations will hinder their preparation for a WC.

So I wasn’t saying suggesting that. Your competitions are fine, they just aren’t going to provide everything.


Interesting insight on the last campaign, and again, those components they’re adding are also practical and sensible attempts to improve their chances at a WC. So they question remains, why go to those lengths and throw it all away by not picking a better team to travel to New Zealand?


I’ve suggested in other topics they are really close to making it work, but also the data that’s been presented in this articles shows that even now they could have also made the tour to NZ work.


That is both in the view as presented here by NB and what other players were available, and in the long term planning that you say Galthie has undertaken, in not taking the opportunity to make it work even better (factors like the dates of these tests could have seen finalists available from test 1) for a tour like this.


TBH, I can understand if Galthie made a calculated decision to undervalue the tour. Many have had a bad opinion about the All Blacks ability/level under Foster, and even in test 1 he might have shown such an attitude to be correct still under Razor.

348 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING World Rugby U20 Championship semi-final fixtures confirmed World Rugby U20 Championship semi-final fixtures confirmed
Search