The bold call Borthwick must make after abject Samoa showing – Andy Goode
Steve Borthwick has some huge decisions to make after England’s abject showing against Samoa, especially at fly half, and he has to be bold.
It always felt like George Ford and Owen Farrell were both selected at the weekend because he didn’t want to choose between them and had been forced into a corner by the former’s form and the latter’s captaincy status but this team ain’t big enough for the both of them now.
He has to make a big call and if the opposition was different I’d be tempted to stick with Ford but Fiji are going to send big runner after big runner down the number 10 channel and Ford might not be missing many tackles but he’s soaking them up and England are losing ground.
Opting for Farrell is also the safer or less controversial decision and Borthwick isn’t someone who naturally wants to ruffle feathers. The Saracens man clearly drives standards but it does seem like he has a looming presence that can also have a negative effect on those around him when he’s either playing second fiddle or not on top of his game.
It feels like groundhog day discussing this again but I honestly don’t think Ford and Farrell have shone alongside one another, or even that Farrell has had a really good game at centre, since the World Cup semi-final four years ago.
You can’t pick on past glory or in the belief that the magic from one game four years ago, however exceptional it was, will suddenly resurface when it matters most and that selection obviously has a massive knock-on effect in other areas of the team.
You have to pick on form and Joe Marchant has been playing well. He’s capable of playing on the wing but can’t have as much of an impact on proceedings from there so he should be paired with Manu Tuilagi in the centres again for the quarter-final.
That would free up a spot on the wing for five-try Henry Arundell to come in and add a bit of much-needed stardust and game-breaking ability to the backline, as well as just looking like there are fewer square pegs in round holes.
I’d actually change both wingers because I think Jonny May is another who is being picked on what he’s done in years gone by rather than his threat to opposition defences in the here and now.
We know Borthwick is massively driven by data and he will have his own metrics that probably show that the Gloucester man is more effective at chasing kicks and being in the right position but he’s 33 and has clearly lost a yard of pace.
I’d be picking Elliot Daly as well as Arundell and his ability to cover a multitude of positions and his enormous left boot could be major advantages in the knockout stages.
I can’t see there being many, if any, changes in the forwards, even if they did struggle against the Samoans as well. Dan Cole is probably most under threat but Borthwick will probably back him to do a job on the Fijian set piece.
I’m not sure any of them are playing particularly well but the reality is that there just isn’t really anyone breathing down the necks of the likes of Maro Itoje, Ellis Genge, Courtney Lawes and Tom Curry.
There has to be a change in mindset though. Lawes speaks really well and has admitted that England’s DNA is their ability in defence and building attack off kicks that they’ve retrieved but I don’t think that is the way to beat Fiji.
Simon Raiwalui’s men might have been far from their best but Portugal showed the blueprint for how to beat them by getting the ball wide and playing with a high tempo in order to fatigue them.
They still utilised the kicking game plenty but there were a lot of short kicks rather than just hoofing the ball long and asking Fiji to play from deep and they were happy to keep the ball in hand as well in a way that we haven’t seen England do for a while.
When you watch a team like Portugal play as they have done in this tournament and you also look at how Ireland, at the other of the spectrum, retain possession and manipulate defences, you wonder why England have adopted the game plan that they have.
Evidently, Borthwick believes it’s the best chance he has of winning or he wouldn’t be doing it but it’s like going back to the dark ages, or the 1990s at least, and it is far from exciting to watch regardless of how much the head honcho talks about his excitement levels.
Just 34% of England’s rucks on Saturday were under three seconds, which is around half of what you might expect from a top team that is playing with intent, and when they do get the ball away from the breakdown their thinking is muddled.
When your ball is slow the opposition defence has had chance to reorganise and it’s more difficult to attack but you have to question England’s decision making when they’re getting into the opposition 22 as many as 17 times and only coming away with a couple of tries.
Maybe the England coaching staff will say that it’s all part of the plan with work going on behind the scenes after a two-week break since the previous game and a three-week gap for quite a lot of players who didn’t feature in the Chile match.
That was the explanation for the poor performances in the Summer Nations Series and England certainly looked fitter in their opening games against Argentina and Japan, even if they didn’t set the world alight, but we can only judge on what we see on the pitch.
Fiji should be buoyed by the return of Semi Radradra and the adrenalin of a first quarter-final for 16 years will carry them a long way but they’ve had four energy-sapping encounters thus far and the tank has looked like it’s running low in the past couple of games.
Maybe England’s superior fitness will tell but I think we need a change in the game plan if we’re going to really stress the Fijians and try to exploit that and create opportunities to attack off the back of it.
England’s players have looked like they’re playing in a straitjacket for a long time now, since well before Borthwick took the reins, so we aren’t going to see the game plan ripped up and them playing with freedom but there has to be a bit of room for manoeuvre.
Most importantly, we need one fly half out there. I fully expect it to be England’s new all-time leading points scorer but you can make a case for either. Borthwick simply has to pick one, though, and not be afraid of upsetting the applecart.
Latest Comments
"Now we have one of the most competitive football markets in the world and we are the canary in the coalmine in terms of change and dealing with that."
And there lies the rub. We don't care about your problems with Aussie Rules or Rugby League. If you're in the job just to save your union from competition by making our fantastic game more like one-dimensional boring league then all the rest of your promises are just BS. We'll be watching you like hawks to try and keep you in line, but - like Beaumont - you'll probably be able to push through whatever you like and the game will lose once again, but this time potentially terminally. I believe that your selection could be the worst decision WR have ever made.
Go to commentsAnd Scott Robertson not going so well is he.
Not a bad effort but a correction. McKenzie was not born in NSW so is not a Tah. He was born in Victoria. Played for the Brumbies and coached Qld and also played and then later coached NSW, until the self entitled Tah players decided to stab him in the back. And who was the captain of the Tahs at the time leading the back stabbing. Well, well it was none other than Phil Waugh, current Rugby Australia CEO. Who recently tried to deny he had met Suallii at Hamish McLennan's house pre signing, until McLennan outed him recently as a bald faced liar as he was in fact there.
I doubt very much if McKenzie, who was also assistant coach to Eddie Jones in Jones first stint coaching Australia, would appreciate being labelled a Tah, given it was the Tahs Hooper and Beale and Cheika who stabbed him in the back again when he walked away thru lack of support from Hooper and Rugby Australia.
Schmidt might have theoretically better credentials, even tho he dumped Ireland in the brink but he had to start somewhere. You can't argue if you think he is great that Schmidt should never have been given an opportunity.
Schmidt lacks a crucial ingredient. He's not Australian. It does matter, which as a Bokke you would well know.
Go to comments