It's off - Sale Sharks issue statement over Jackson/Olding rumours
Sale Sharks have distanced themselves from speculation that they are to sign former Ulster Rugby players Paddy Jackson and Stuart Olding.
Yesterday the Telegraph reported that cut-price deals for the duo had been agreed, with their signings to be announced once the Premiership season finishes.
A statement issued this evening by the club reads:
"Sale Sharks can confirm there is no substance to the rumours currently circulating in relation to the signing of the two international rugby players Paddy Jackson and Stuart Olding. Our search continues for top class players to bolster the squad for next season."
Meanwhile RFU CEO Steve Brown has given England Rugby’s position on any potential signing of the pair by a Premiership club.
Speaking to RugbyPass on the matter, the RFU CEO said the matter was ‘down to individual’ clubs.
“I think it’s down to individual clubs,” Brown told RugbyPass’s Nick Heath. “I don’t know the specifics of any kind of deals that are there or any negotiations but I think it is down to clubs themselves to make that call.
“I think it is a moral position that they need to take and it’s a difficult call when someone is found not guilty of something but there are other reasons why a union has taken a position on something. As I’ve said before we take a very strong view to any kind of behaviour that would not be considered appropriate."
“It’s a case by case thing,” said Brown. “I think the club has to make their own call. My view is that you’ve got to take it as it is and I think the Irish union did what they did and I respect that decision.”
Both players had their contracts terminated after the IRFU and Ulster Rugby conducted an internal review following Jackson and Olding’s acquittal over rape charges.
The review focused on a series of explicit group text conversations involving the players and their friends, which was revealed during the trial.
Protests took place outside Ulster’s Kingspan Stadium following the trial and a number of the club’s sponsors expressed their concerns over the players conduct prior to their sacking.
The CEO said that he was wary of the RFU having a position on the matter as it could be seen to be dictatorial to clubs.
“That could be quite dictatorial and prescriptive of us. I’d rather it was more natural… a natural view – that the club took – in considering whether or not a player is appropriately qualified to play for them and the right representation. I think we have to leave it that way. I think we have to be careful that we don’t dictate that.”
“We do set the tone by the way we respond to people’s behaviour or if they do say the wrong thing and you’ve seen that play out in the public domain,” concluded Brown.
Latest Comments
Danny don't care. He pretends to care but he don't. He says all this stuff to justify his reasoning but no one can claim that legitimately. He knew exactly what he was doing and wondered if his old team mate would overlook it, which he did. Ref has got to be sidelined or properly trained. It's one thing for refs to move up the ranks but if it was me I would require refs to either have played in different clubs or not at all having the temptation to bias in high stakes games like this. This has got to be stamped out. But then again World Rugby is so destroying the game of rugby in an attempt to be more “safe” and “concussion free”. What they are doing is making it more infuriating for the fans and more difficult for the refs to officiate evenly and consistently. It's fast become Australian Rules football. If guys don't want concussions, they should have played chess. Stop complaining you oldies of the game. When they played the game was vastly heavier hitting than it is now but of course they can't see that.
Go to commentsJa, why do Bulls get flack for not bringing their best but Leinster never bring their best and it goes “unnoticed”?
Go to comments