Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Brumbies edge Rebels in pre-season blowout in Wagga Wagga

(Photo by Brett Hemmings/Getty Images)

Len Ikitau’s second-half double was enough for the ACT Brumbies to skip clear after the Melbourne Rebels had fired their first shots ahead of the Super Rugby Pacific season.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Brumbies led early but needed a second-half surge in a 35-33 win in Wagga Wagga on Saturday.

The Rebels, beaten 24-0 by Fijian Drua in their only other trial game, held sway and led 19-12 early in the second half after stalling the Brumbies’ rolling maul and finding space on the left flank.

But Wallabies centre Ikitau produced the critical plays, twice tumbling out of tackles to score his tries in the Brumbies’ comeback.

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

His second put them nine points clear before the Rebels scored a consolation try after the siren.

Rugby sevens recruits Corey Toole continued his fine pre-season form with a try for the winners, while fellow sevens product and Tokyo Olympian Joe Pincus made the most of his early minutes with a first-half double.

Pincus was on after Ray Nu’u was helped of f with a right knee injury, while Rebels five-eighth Carter Gordon was also limping when he exited in the 60th minute.

The emerging playmaker was sharp before that, throwing the pass for Pincus’s first try and running at the line with confidence.

Playing fullback, Reece Hodge was also impressive while Jack Debreczeni was smooth in pulling the Brumbies’ strings in the No.10.

ADVERTISEMENT

Victory for the Brumbies followed a tight win over the Waratahs in their other pre-season game, returning coach Stephen Larkham to enter the season later this month with a perfect record.

ADVERTISEMENT

KOKO Show | July 8th | Bernard Foley stops by to talk the Wallabies winning and Lions being tested

England v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Georgia vs Ireland | Men’s International | Full Match Replay

Lions Share | Episode 2

Chile vs Romania | Men’s International | Full Match Replay

USA vs Belgium | Men’s International | Full Match Replay

Touchdown in Dublin, The Red Sea Returns & We Prepare to Face Argentina | Ep 2: The Ultimate Test

South Africa v British & Irish Lions | 2009 | Second Test | The Vaults

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

I
IkeaBoy 19 minutes ago
Can Les Bleus avoid a Black-wash in New Zealand?

Forgive me, I meant BILLIONAIRES.


Altrad (Montpellier), Lorenzetti (Racing 92) & Wild (Stade Francais) have a combined NET worth of more than €10 billion! Altrad even gets to kit sponsor the national team despite the conflict of interest that would bring.


They are all cash cows as teams who go some length without winning major trophies still yield huge returns on the money their owners pump into them. The prize money is of little consequence even to serial winners. Any time they need a cash injection, they just hit up an investment partner.


Fiducial – the largest private shareholder in the league - has a 12% interest in Toulouse. They wouldn’t have to pay much in to get a cut of the €700 million broadcast deal, the bulk of which goes to the Top 14.  


Dupont – the league and indeed the games poster boy – is the product of rural dairy farmers rather fittingly as he is milked. His salary is a fraction of what he generates for his club, his country and for the sport.  Cash cow. And now recovering from his second major injury in as many years.


The clubs certainly don’t mess about when it comes to pumping money into the game but look at it in inflation terms.  It’s never at a higher rate year on year than the increase in their TV and broadcast deals. 


The club game has always been France’s priority. They got kicked out of the 5 Nations for almost 15 years because they paid players to play the game at club level despite its amateur status at the time. They were so very resistant to the eventual professionalism of the game. And openly so.


Their former Vichy government quite literally banned rugby league as a sport to clear the way for rugby union!


It’s a great league to watch and well supported but it’s a money league.  If you are going to mix metaphors and compare sports it’s not the French soccer league but the Saudi oil leagues that is a better comparison.  That’s what the Top 14 is in relative terms.


A lot of their current dealings around salary caps are shady. Proper shady. It was only a couple of seasons ago when Jaminet was ‘loaned’ 450K as a disguised payment to buy out his own contract to then move clubs. Interest free as well…

331 Go to comments
f
fl 2 hours ago
Springboks' dominance of the world rankings comes under increased threat

“Ireland entered RWC 2023 a full 12 points clear of England. They were only 5 ahead at the end. So England gained a massive 7 points against Ireland which is not a reflection of how either teams played: far from it.”

I completely disagree here! Ireland played better than England, but they started the tournament ranked first in the world on 91.82 points. Obviously Ireland were not the best team at the tournament so it makes sense that their ranking got (slightly) worse. England began the tournament ranked 8th on 79.95 points. Obviously they played much much better than that, particularly when you consider that they were ranked below Fiji and Argentina, and beat both of those teams (Argentina twice!) during the tournament, so a significant improvement in the rankings was deserved.


“The swing between England and Scotland was 6 points towards England. Scotland didn’t do much wrong bar get a ridiculous draw with Ireland and South Africa. They were #5th at the time but were literally eliminated by the draw.”

Again - that swing makes perfect sense when you consider England’s ranking before the tournament. England were rewarded for beating teams ranked ahead of them. Scotland had a horrible draw that led to them being unfairly forced out of the competition, but they weren’t really punished in the rankings - their ranking score went from 84.01 to 83.43; barely a change.


“Wales benefitted by the draw in 2023.”

They benefitted in the sense that they made a QF that they would not have made had they swapped places with Scotland, but they didn’t really benefit in the rankings. Their ranking rose from 78.26 to 80.64 because they won a pool containing Fiji and Australia - two teams ranked ahead of them at the start of the comp.


“In 2019 they made a semi after a French player was sent off early in that quarter final. So they benefitted from the double points in the RWC.”

You can only rise significantly in the rankings by beating teams considered better than you. Wales’ ranking only rose by 0.5 points after beating France, because France were considered at the time to be a worse side. The double points therefore only helped Wales by 0.25 points.


“if they stay 14th and 13 teams do better than them in the RWC then their defecit will widen and doubly so because the loss would be doubled.”

If Wales keep playing badly they will decline in the rankings, but they will hardly decline at all if they only lose to teams ranked above them. E.g. Using today’s ranking points, lets imagine Wales drew Ireland, Fiji, and Romania in their pool, losing against the first two but beating Romania, then lost to France in the R16. The worst case scenario (losing to Fiji, Ireland, and France by more than 15 points, and beating Romania by less than 15) would only lose Wales 0.66 points. The alternate scenario (coming within 15 points of Fiji and beating Romania by more than 15) would lose Wales just 0.29 points.

9 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING All Blacks will thrash France on Saturday All Blacks will thrash France on Saturday
Search