1
'Absolute madness': Clive Woodward rips into Borthwick in wake of NZ loss
By Ian Cameron
Former England head coach Clive Woodward has sharply criticized Steve Borthwickās decisions during Englandās 24-22 loss to New Zealand, calling his substitution strategy ācriminalā in a scathing column.
ADVERTISEMENT
Borthwick is under fire for a number of bizarrely timed substitutions, most notably that of George Ford for Marcus Smith. Ford went on to have a shocker, missing a try-saving tackle on Mark Telea and two kickable chances to win the game in the dying moments.
A fuming Woodward wrote: āEnglandās latest defeat by New Zealand left me genuinely angry. Steve Borthwickās methods must be questioned because the game was there for the taking.ā
England held a promising 22-14 lead at the 60-minute mark when Borthwick made āpremeditated substitutions,ā removing key players Ben Spencer, Marcus Smith, and Chandler Cunningham-South, despite their strong performances. āIt was absolute madness,ā Woodward wrote, āNot only was that trio standing out in an error-strewn yet titanic game, but they were also not fatigued in any way, shape or form.ā
Woodward described Smithās reaction on the bench: āWhen Smith sat down, he almost looked around and shrugged his shoulders as if to say āIs that it? Is that me done?āā He argued that England, with an eight-point lead, should have pressed on instead of attempting to contain New Zealand.
Labelling the tactic as āa criminal and decisive mistake,ā Woodward slammed Borthwickās apparent reliance on pre-planned replacements. āIn international rugby, you cannot simply contain an opponent and look to hang on to your advantage. You have to earn the victory for the full 80 minutes.ā
He also questioned the impact of replacements Harry Randall and the aforementioned Ford: āWhen Ford came on, he was waving his hands and urging the team to calm downā¦ the message was, āWeāre going to hold on to this nowā rather than āWeāre going to continue to play and win the game.āā
ADVERTISEMENT
Woodward called for the need for adaptability over rigid planning, writing: āInternational coaching cannot be ā and will never be ā about premeditated replacements.ā
He called on Englandās management to address these issues swiftly, urging that āthis pain should hurt, and hurt for a very long time, predominantly because defeat was totally avoidable and of their own making.ā
Borthwick is supposed to be the archetypical conservative coach, the guy that might not deliver a sparkling, high-risk attacking style, but whose teams execute the basics flawlessly. And that's OK, because it can be really hard to beat teams that are rock solid and consistent in the rugby equivalent of "blocking and tackling".
But this is why the performance against NZ is hard to defend. You can forgive a conservative, back-to-basics team for failing to score tons of tries, because teams like that make up for it with reliability in the simple things. They can defend well, apply territorial pressure, win the set piece battles, and take their scoring chances with metronomic goal kicking, maul tries and pick-and-go goal line attacks.
The reason why the English rugby administrators should be on high alert is not that the English team looked unable to score tries, but that they were repeatedly unable to close out a game by executing basic, coachable skills. Regardless of how they got to the point of being in control of their destiny, they did get to that point. All that was needed was to be world class at things that require more training than talent. But that training was apparently missing, and the finger has to point at the coach.
Borthwick has been in the job for nearly two years, a period that includes two 6N programs and an RWC campaign. So where are the solid foundations that he has been building?
Who is Clive Woodward? Is he the Spurs coach?
I think he hosts a TV show. Maybe thats Clive Robertson...
Trying a bomb squad but... LOL