Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Absolute madness': Clive Woodward rips into Borthwick in wake of NZ loss

England head coach Steve Borthwick during the Guinness Six Nations Rugby Championship match between England and Ireland at Twickenham Stadium in London, England. (Photo By David Fitzgerald/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Former England head coach Clive Woodward has sharply criticized Steve Borthwick’s decisions during England’s 24-22 loss to New Zealand, calling his substitution strategy “criminal” in a scathing column.

ADVERTISEMENT

Borthwick is under fire for a number of bizarrely timed substitutions, most notably that of George Ford for Marcus Smith. Ford went on to have a shocker, missing a try-saving tackle on Mark Telea and two kickable chances to win the game in the dying moments.

A fuming Woodward wrote: “England’s latest defeat by New Zealand left me genuinely angry. Steve Borthwick’s methods must be questioned because the game was there for the taking.”

England held a promising 22-14 lead at the 60-minute mark when Borthwick made “premeditated substitutions,” removing key players Ben Spencer, Marcus Smith, and Chandler Cunningham-South, despite their strong performances. “It was absolute madness,” Woodward wrote, “Not only was that trio standing out in an error-strewn yet titanic game, but they were also not fatigued in any way, shape or form.”

Woodward described Smith’s reaction on the bench: “When Smith sat down, he almost looked around and shrugged his shoulders as if to say ‘Is that it? Is that me done?’” He argued that England, with an eight-point lead, should have pressed on instead of attempting to contain New Zealand.

Labelling the tactic as “a criminal and decisive mistake,” Woodward slammed Borthwick’s apparent reliance on pre-planned replacements. “In international rugby, you cannot simply contain an opponent and look to hang on to your advantage. You have to earn the victory for the full 80 minutes.”

He also questioned the impact of replacements Harry Randall and the aforementioned Ford: “When Ford came on, he was waving his hands and urging the team to calm down… the message was, ‘We’re going to hold on to this now’ rather than ‘We’re going to continue to play and win the game.’”

ADVERTISEMENT

Woodward called for the need for adaptability over rigid planning, writing: “International coaching cannot be — and will never be — about premeditated replacements.”

He called on England’s management to address these issues swiftly, urging that “this pain should hurt, and hurt for a very long time, predominantly because defeat was totally avoidable and of their own making.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

Pollock Loses Bill, Players Meet Their Roommates & Training in Portugal | Ep 1: The Ultimate Test

Top tackles in Lions Tests

Top 10 inspiring Lions speeches

United States of Rugby | Episode 1 – Welcome to Dawgtown

Top 10 Best Lions Tries of the 2000s

Toshiba Brave Lupus Tokyo vs Kubota Spears | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 Final | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 42 | Investec Champions Cup Final Review

The Game that Made Jonah Lomu

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
F
Flankly 225 days ago

Borthwick is supposed to be the archetypical conservative coach, the guy that might not deliver a sparkling, high-risk attacking style, but whose teams execute the basics flawlessly. And that's OK, because it can be really hard to beat teams that are rock solid and consistent in the rugby equivalent of "blocking and tackling".


But this is why the performance against NZ is hard to defend. You can forgive a conservative, back-to-basics team for failing to score tons of tries, because teams like that make up for it with reliability in the simple things. They can defend well, apply territorial pressure, win the set piece battles, and take their scoring chances with metronomic goal kicking, maul tries and pick-and-go goal line attacks.


The reason why the English rugby administrators should be on high alert is not that the English team looked unable to score tries, but that they were repeatedly unable to close out a game by executing basic, coachable skills. Regardless of how they got to the point of being in control of their destiny, they did get to that point. All that was needed was to be world class at things that require more training than talent. But that training was apparently missing, and the finger has to point at the coach.


Borthwick has been in the job for nearly two years, a period that includes two 6N programs and an RWC campaign. So where are the solid foundations that he has been building?

G
GG 226 days ago

Who is Clive Woodward? Is he the Spurs coach?

H
Head high tackle 225 days ago

I think he hosts a TV show. Maybe thats Clive Robertson...

R
RW 226 days ago

Trying a bomb squad but... LOL

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 1 hour ago
Ex-Wallaby laughs off claims Bath are amongst the best in the world

I think their previous seasons aren’t especially relevant to how good they are now, but YOU do. I think its pretty obvious that I’m making the point that even applying your criteria, which involves looking at Leinster’s record over multiple seasons, they are a really good side - arguably the best in Europe/the world.


“In each of those seasons they did meet teams who were better than them, thats why they lost those matches.”

(1) I don’t really agree, as you can’t judge who is better than who purely on the basis of one match. I guess you’d say that Northampton are better than Leinster bc they beat them, but would you also say that Gloucester are better than Northampton, because they beat them twice and finished higher in the league? Who do you think is the better team, Leinster or Gloucester?

(2) fwiw I didn’t claim that Leinster were the best team in any one season (prior to this one). In 2022 and 2023 la Rochelle were better, but they were pretty poor in 2024 (definitely not top 5; probably not top 10), so I think over the period 2022-2024 Leinster were better overall. In 2024 Toulouse were better than Leinster, but they weren’t in 2023 or 2022, so I think over the period 2022-2024 Leinster were better overall. You’re welcome to disagree, but do you?


“I didn’t say I hated Leinster either so not sure why you felt the need to mention hate.”

I was using “hate” more as a synonym for “being negative about” rather than meaning the actual emotion of hatred. Sorry if that confused matters.

16 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Brumbies backed to rebound despite more semi-final heartbreak Brumbies backed to rebound despite more semi-final heartbreak
Search