'C'mon, who are you trying to kid?': Dallaglio lashes Eddie Jones
Famed ex-England No8 Lawrence Dallaglio has turned the heat up on Eddie Jones ahead of next weekend’s Guinness Six Nations game at home to Ireland. The 2003 World Cup winner has spoken with exasperation about the coach’s claim that this is a new era, adding that so uncreative were the English backs against Wales last weekend that the forwards should have stopped giving the ball out of them.
Following a February where the England attack failed to consistently fire in the loss to Scotland, the low-frills win over Italy and the narrow victory of the Welsh, Dallagio laid bare his frustrations with the Jones approach when hosting the latest episode of his new podcast.
Chairing a panel of guests that included ex-Ireland midfielder Brian O’Driscoll on the Lawrence Dallaglio Rugby Podcast, the former forward took aim at Jones for his codology that this is a new England team.
“I hear Eddie Jones talking that this is a young inexperienced side, this a new England side. I mean, c’mon, who are you trying to kid? You have been the head coach for six years, you can’t suddenly try and pull the wool over England fans’ eyes and say this is a new era, a new dawn. We’re 18 months out from the World Cup.”
Dallaglio then took issue with the general lack of speed in the round three display produced by England. “We were told that Harry Randall, who didn’t have a bad game, was picked to pick up the pace of England’s attack and try and get them playing a bit quicker. The image that stuck in my mind is every time we had the opportunity to up the pace of the game we seemed to deliberately slow it down.
“I lost count how many lineouts England had where they went into this mass huddle about 20 yards away from the lineout and then it took them forever to get the call etc. I just think there needs to be a bit more urgency about this England team and for them to understand that if they are going to challenge the likes of Ireland and ultimately France in the next couple of rounds there are going to have to play significantly better.
“As a forward last Saturday, I probably would have stopped giving the ball to the backs after a little while because they weren’t doing enough with it,” continued Dallaglio. “For what it is worth I do believe that England need to add a bit more ball-carrying ability into their pack, whether that is Alfie Barbeary at six, whether it is Courtney Lawes into the second row or Joe Launchbury, someone like that.
“If they don’t have guys who can punch up the middle in their backline then they do need to think how they actually get over the advantage line because I am quite worried about the Ireland and France games because of the physical nature of what they have got, particularly in their pack. These are going to be very interesting games from an England perspective.”
Latest Comments
Don’t pay a blind bit of notice to Lukie… he likes the sound of his own voice and is always looking for something controversial to say. He has been banging on about Leinster's defensive system all season like he knows something Jacques Nienebar doesn’t. Which is the reason why he didn’t apply for the job obviously
Go to commentsI’m all for speeding up the game. But can we be certain that the slowness of the game contributed to fans walking out? I’m not so sure. Super rugby largely suffered from most fans only being able to, really, follow the games played in their own time zone. So at least a third of the fan base wasn’t engaged at any point in time. As a Saffer following SA teams in the URC - I now watch virtually every European game played on the weekend. In SR, I wouldn’t be bothered to follow the games being played on the other side of the world, at weird hours, if my team wasn’t playing. I now follow the whole tournament and not just the games in my time zone. Second, with New Zealand teams always winning. It’s like formula one. When one team dominates, people lose interest. After COVID, with SA leaving and Australia dipping in form, SR became an even greater one horse race. Thats why I think Japan’s league needs to get in the mix. The international flavor of those teams could make for a great spectacle. But surely if we believe that shaving seconds off lost time events in rugby is going to draw fans back, we should be shown some figures that supports this idea before we draw any major conclusions. Where are the stats that shows these changes have made that sort of impact? We’ve measured down to the average no. Of seconds per game. Where the measurement of the impact on the fanbase? Does a rugby “fan” who lost interest because of ball in play time suddenly have a revived interest because we’ve saved or brought back into play a matter of seconds or a few minutes each game? I doubt it. I don’t thinks it’s even a noticeable difference to be impactful. The 20 min red card idea. Agreed. Let’s give it a go. But I think it’s fairer that the player sent off is substituted and plays no further part in the game as a consequence.
Go to comments