Conflicting reports emerging over Luke McAlister's rumoured move to Wales
Social media rumours linking Luke McAlister with a move to the PRO14 have been denied - according to reports.
It has been suggested on Rugby Inside Line on Twitter that the Ospreys had found a replacement for the departing Dan Biggar in form of All Black veteran Luke McAllister.
However Walesonline are reporting that the Ospreys have dismissed the claim.
The 34-year-old McAlister has enjoyed a storied career in the South of France after leaving the All Black setup in the wake of New Zealand's 2007 World Cup disaster.
Continue reading below...
According to the Welsh website there is no truth the rumours, at least not according to the club themselves.
“No one at the region knows anything about this,” a spokesperson told Walesonline. “There’s nothing in it...It’s news to us all at the Ospreys.”
However Rugby Inside Line pointed out that there had been a similar dismissal of the claim that Dan Biggar was moving to the Northampton Saints on Walesonline, a move that ended up going ahead.
However the party line is that Ospreys are more than satisfied with the services of youngster Sam Davies.
McAlister - renowned for his massive leg muscles - can play both centre and at flyhalf.
The 5'11, 95kg Waitara born back played for Sale Sharks, Toulouse, Toulon and Clermont on loan. He won 30 caps for the All Blacks with 11 coming from the bench.
McAlister was largely seen as an understudy to Dan Carter during his time in New Zealand, and was arguably one of the most talented All Blacks of his generation to turn his back on representing his country in favour of playing in Europe; all at the age of just 23.
Latest Comments
i think Argentina v France could be a good game too, depending on which Argentina turns up. The most difficult to call is Scotland Australia.
Go to commentsSmith is playing a different game with the rest of the backs struggling to understand. That's the problem with so called playmakers, if nobody gets what they're doing then it often just leads to a turnover. It gets worse when Borthwick changes one of them, which is why they don't score points at the end. Sometimes having a brilliant playmaker can be problematic if a team cannot be built around them. Once again Borthwick seems lacking in either coaching or selection. I can't help but think it's the latter coupled with pressure to select the big name players.
Lastly, his forward replacements are poor and exposed either lack of depth or selection pressure. Cole hemorrhages scrum penalties whenever he comes on, opponents take advantage of the England scrum and close out the game. Is that the best England can offer?
Go to comments