Controversial relegation shake-up for Premiership on the cards
London Irish could be exiled from the English Premiership for five years under a controversial proposal being put forward by the Rugby Football Union to tackle relegation from the top flight of English rugby.
The Rugby Football Union are understood to be leading a move to introduce a home and away play off in May 2019 between the bottom team in the 12 club Premiership and the top team in the Championship and the winner will have a place at the top table of English rugby for at least five years. No more relegation would be instigated in that period to give the leading clubs financial stability and the chance to build new stadia or invest in their current venues.
England’s top clubs are making it clear that this is an RFU driven proposal that is expected to be on the agenda at next month’ Professional Game Board meeting at Twickenham which will seen the Union, Premiership rugby and the Rugby Players Association present.
The ramifications of the proposed changed could be extremely serious for London Irish who are rumoured to be losing £2.5m a season and can expect a drop of £2m in central funding if they are relegated. Irish are currently ten points adrift at the bottom of the Premiership and Mick Crossan, the majority share-holder, is looking for new investors to help deal with the mounting losses. However, attracting backers will be very difficult if Irish are doomed to spend five years in the Championship. The club recently turned down an approach to buy its shares in Premiership rugby which increases the amount of money shared out by the top clubs.
An extended period out of the top flight would also throw into question their proposed ground share with Brentford or a move to a new stadium being build by Wimbledon. They currently pay Reading FC rent to use the Madejski Stadium.
English club officials point out that the RFU can hardly stand against moves to bring in relegation from the Six Nations if they operate a similar system for the Premiership and this proposal would end that debate.
Latest Comments
Agreed. As a Saffa I have much respect for the ABs. I also have to say given any option I would ONLY prefer to lose to ABs. To lose to England is probably the most embarrassing think to happen to either of us.
There was a time when both of us lost to England and we both hated it. Thankfully those days are behind us. Kudos to you guys, kudos to ABs. But dear old BS seems to hate us Boks. No idea why.
Go to commentsI got the sense that holding him to it was kickback from SB and the rfu smarting at being jilted quite so soon, so unexpectedly and so publicly.
Seem to remember that they spoke to Gustard before appointing Joe and you really have to think he would have come in at a higher level?
Go to comments