De Villiers: Boks can 'definitely win both games against All Blacks'
Former Springboks midfielder Jean de Villiers is backing Jacques Nienaber’s squad to deliver a 2-0 series win over the wounded All Blacks. The Rugby Championship begins this Saturday in Nelspruit with South Africa hosting New Zealand and the rivals will then face off a second time in Johannesburg on August 13.
Whereas the Springboks head into the series on the back of their 2-1 series win over Wales last month, the All Backs have their backs pinned firmly to the wall following a run of results that has seen them win just once in their last five matches.
The fallout from their recent 1-2 series defeat to Ireland resulted in Ian Foster altering his backroom staff. However, with the upcoming games set to be played at altitude, the odds are still very much stacked in favour of the Springboks, who have named a team showing three changes from the win last time out versus the Welsh.
It’s a consensus that de Villiers has given his fulsome backing to, the 109-cap former midfielder believing the time is ripe for the Springboks to reclaim the Freedom Cup - the trophy contested each year against the All Blacks - for the first time since 2009.
Speaking to BokSquad, the official supporters’ club of South African Rugby, de Villiers said: "The All Blacks have been poor results-wise and will want to rectify that in South Africa. They are struggling with certain areas of their game, which the Boks will want to exploit.
"Another factor is that New Zealand's players no longer play Super Rugby in South Africa. In the past, they would get to play at altitude during Super Rugby so it wouldn't have too much of an effect on them in the Tri-Nations or Rugby Championship. Many of their players who come to South Africa this year won't be used to it, which will benefit the Boks.
"The Boks will obviously look to exploit areas of weakness in the All Blacks' game and I hope they have learned from last year's two matches against them. The Boks lost the first game narrowly after showing no ambition with ball in hand.
“In the second game, which they won, they did keep ball in hand and took their opportunities to attack. That is when the Boks are at their best, the 2019 World Cup final being a prime example.
"The Boks put teams under pressure by playing the game they play - a strong, solid first phase, big defence and a good kicking game - but if they can get the balance right in terms of attack, and keep ball in hand when the opportunity is there, then they can definitely win both games against the All Blacks."
Latest Comments
Actually the era defining moment came a few years earlier. February 2002 to be precise, when Michael D Higgins as finance minister at the time introduced his sports persons tax relief bill to the dial. As the politicians of the day stated “It seems to be another daft K Club frolic born in Kildare amongst the well-paid professional jockeys with whom the Minister plays golf” and that the scheme represented “a savage uncaring vision of Ireland and one that should be condemned”. The irfu and Leinster would be nowhere near the position they are in today without this key component of the finances.
Go to commentsIt is crystal clear that people who make such threats on line should be tried and imprisoned. Those with responsibility in social media companies who don’t facilitate this should be convicted. In real life, I have free speech to approach someone like Reinach and verbally threaten him. I am risking a conviction or a slap but I could do it. In the old days, If someone anonymously threatened someone by letter the police would ask and use evidence from the postal system. Unlike the Post, social media companies have complete instant and legal access to the content in social media. They make money from the data, billions. Yet, they turn a blind eye to terrorism, Nazi-ism and industrial levels of threats against individuals including their address and childrens schools being published online all from ananoymous accounts not real speech. They claim free speech. The fault is with the perps but also social media companies who think anonymous personas posting death threats constitutes free speech.
Go to comments