1
Defending Super champions Crusaders stunned by Chiefs
By AAP
The Chiefs have rallied from 10-0 down after 20 minutes to beat the defending champion Crusaders 31-10 and pull off the first upset of the Super Rugby Pacific season in the opening match.
Center David Havili scored the first try of the season in the 20th minute on Friday night, and the conversion which followed a penalty by Richie Mo'unga gave the home side a 10-0 lead in front of a large crowd.
The Chiefs were able to stay in a mostly scrappy match and had cut the lead to 10-7 at halftime with a try to lock Brodie Retallick.
Second-half tries to captain Sam Cane, center Alex Nankivell and replacement Cortez Ratima put the Chiefs ahead 31-10, while the Crusaders mostly were locked in their own half or contained by the Chiefs' defence.
New rules applied this season to speed up the game produced a faster game, though often at the expense of structure and the Chiefs adapted more quickly than the Crusaders.
The Christchurch-based Crusaders were forced to make a large number of tackles in the second half and missed too many, and were outscored 24-0.
"I thought we hung in there really well in the first half when we put ourselves under a bit of pressure," Chiefs captain Cane said.
"I thought in the second half we got a lot of that right.
"A lot of belief in this team. We feel like we've been building for a couple of years so it's a good start to our season."
The Crusaders were on top early, winning the set piece battle and Havili scored when Cane was in the sin bin for a professional foul.
Retallick scored in the 33rd minute after a break by Shaun Stevenson set up an attacking lineout. Halfback Brad Weber scooted through a gap and Retallick was on hand as he was throughout the match.
The Chiefs grabbed the lead in the 49th minute with Cane's try and made the lead 21-10 when Nankivell dived over in the 60th.
Ratima made an outstanding break from a scrum to score under the posts when the Crusaders were down to 14 men and five-eighth Damian McKenzie made all of his kicks to accentuate the Chiefs' advantage.
Trending on RugbyPass
2
Jake White: Ireland, Australia and Wales have the same problem
3
David Campese names his Springbok world player of the year winner
4
Let's be real about these All Blacks
5
Latest Comments
GB is England, Scotland, Wales. They are the 3 constituent countries in Great Britain. Ergo playing only those three countries is a tour of GB. The difference between GB and the UK is Northern Ireland. It's not a huge deal to be accurate and call places by their correct name. But please refrain from your idiotic attempts to BS that GB=UK. It doesn't.
Go to commentsThe 2023 draw was only criticized when it became apparent that the top 5 sides in the world were on the same side of the draw. Nowhere did they discuss the decision to backtrack to 2019 rankings which ensured that England and Wales (ranked #12 in 2023) were ranked top4.
The parties who trashed out the schedule were England Rugby, NZ Rugby and ITV. It is bordering on corrupt that a Rugby nation has the power to schedule its opponents to play a major match the week before facing them in a QF.
You won't find commentary by members of the relevant committees because a committee did not make the scheduling decision. I have never heard members of World Rugby speak out on the draw or scheduling issues.
For example in 2015 Japan were hammered by Scotland 4 days after beating SA. The criticism only happens after a cock up.
A fair pool schedule is pretty straightforward: The lowest two tanked teams must play on last pool day but not against each other. That means that TV can focus on promoting big matches with a Tier2 involved for that Friday.
Why does NZ Always get its preferred slot playing the hardest pool match on day 1?
Why do other teams eg France, Ireland, Scotland get so often scheduled to play a hard match the week before the QFs?
If you believe the rules around scheduling are transparent then please point me in the right direction?
Go to comments