Don't be fearful of life without Whitelock, Retallick or Smith
I’m going to assume Scott Roberston was caught on the hop.
It happens to players and coaches all the time, despite the increasing efforts of media minders to make sure questions are preempted.
All the same, there are times in an interview situation, when someone will be asked something they weren’t expecting.
Because if Robertson, when doing a television appearance this week, really thought lock and halfback were areas of weakness or concern for the All Blacks team he is inheriting, then I have concerns for what games he’s been watching and how well he knows the player pool.
Perhaps he was, if a little clumsily, trying to emphasise how important players such as Aaron Smith, Brodie Retallick and Sam Whitelock have been over the years.
Maybe, in a cack-handed kind of way, he just wanted to emphasise the trio’s place in history.
But, honestly, I’m actually quite enthused about who’s about to assume those positions.
I don’t want to put the mocker on him, but Cam Roigard has the potential to be the absolute star of the Super Rugby Pacific season.
Beyond him, players such Folau Fakatava, Cortez Ratima and Finlay Christie are all capable footballers. I’ve learnt not to write TJ Perenara off either.
There’s an argument to be made that Roigard was the most under-utilised All Black at last year’s Rugby World Cup and, if ever a player appeared poised for stardom, it would be him.
We’ll wait and see.
Just as we’ll wait to see what Josh Lord’s true ability as a test lock is and Tupou Vaai’i, for that matter.
I think the Chiefs have Super Rugby Pacific champions written all over them, in no small part because of having those two blokes in the second row.
Patrick Tuipulotu still has some good test rugby ahead of him, Scott Barrett will be one of the first names on the All Blacks’ team sheet and I’ve always had a soft spot for Quinten Strange.
Then there’s Mitchell Dunshea.
I suspect these are the kinds of selection conversations we’ll indulge in throughout Super Rugby Pacific, given the competition itself might struggle to win hearts and minds.
On a weekly basis, we’ll fall in and out of love with players and opine about who’s deserving of All Blacks consideration.
We are at the start of a new world cup cycle and regeneration will be a theme of the next few years. Mainstays of the Steve Hansen and Ian Foster eras are gradually stepping away and we will begin to get a team that’s largely created in Robertson’s image.
I do have reservations about the depth of some of our Super Rugby Pacific squads, but not in our ability to still find enough capable blokes to fill All Blacks jumpers.
Whatever the failings of provincial and franchise football, the schools system continues to produce enough athletes for our coaches to hopefully turn into rugby players.
We’ll remember men such as Retallick, Whitelock and Smith fondly, but we shouldn’t be fearful of life without them.
Latest Comments
I’ve seen an improvement in both.
Go to commentsFrance using the 7-1, England using the 6-2, Ireland and Scotland have used it a few times as well and many nations are starting to adopt it. The reality is the game is changing. Administrators have made it faster and that is leading to more significant drop offs in the forwards. You have 2 options. Load your bench with forwards or alter your player conditioning which might mean more intense conditioning for forwards and a drop off in bulk. The game can still be played many ways. Every nation needs to adapt in their own way to suit their strengths. France have followed the Springbok model of tight forwards being preferred because it suits them. They have huge hunks of meat and the bench is as good as the starters so why not go for it? The Springboks have also used hybrids like Kwagga Smith, Schalk Britz, Deon Fourie, Franco Mostert and others. England are following that model instead and by putting 3 loosies there who can do damage in defence and make the breakdown a mess in the final quarter. It worked well against Wales but will be interested to see how it goes going forward against better opposition who can threaten their lineout and scrum. All the talk around bench limitations to stop the 7-1 and 6-2 for me is nonsense. Coaches who refuse to innovate want to keep the game the same and make it uniform and sameness is bad for fans. The bench composition adds jeopardy and is a huge debate point for fans who love it. Bench innovations have not made the game worse, they have made it better and more watchable. They challenge coaches and teams and that’s what fans want. What we need now is more coaches to innovate. There is still space for the 5-3 or even a 4-4 if a coach is willing to take it on and play expansive high tempo possession-based rugby with forwards who are lean and mean and backs who are good over the ball. The laws favour that style more than ever before. Ireland are too old to do it now. Every team needs to innovate to best suit their style and players so I hope coaches and pundits stop moaning about forwards and benches and start to find different ways to win.
Go to comments