Jones blindsided by the revelation he was named at Erasmus hearing
Eddie Jones is a coach very rarely stuck for words but the England boss was blindsided by the revelation that his name featured in the sanctioning section of the written judgment published after Rassie Erasmus was banned from rugby this week.
Springboks director Erasmus was suspended from all rugby with immediate effect on Wednesday for a period of two months following his misconduct hearing regarding charges arising out of the Test series versus the British and Irish Lions earlier this year.
Erasmus was also banned from any involvement on a matchday until September 30 next year, while SA Rugby must pay a fine of £20,000. Both Erasmus and SA Rugby must also apologise for their actions, but both those parties have since stated they will be exercising their right to appeal.
In the 80-page written judgment detailing how the entire case was handled from the July 24 Test match in Cape Town all the way through to the decision to suspend Erasmus, the name of England boss Jones cropped up on page 40 of the document, something that was news to the Australian when it was mentioned to him at his team announcement media briefing on Thursday.
Falling under a section headed regulatory powers, guidance and principles, the judicial committee noted that they had been provided with plenty of examples of sanctioning in cases involving a coach or director of rugby directly threatening a match official. First in the list of seven cases referenced was the 2007 disciplinary hearing taken against Jones by Sanzar.
The listing read: "Jones, then coach of Queensland Reds, admitted misconduct arising out of his media comments which included the following observations: 'Referee decided to referee the scrums a different way which I thought was absolutely outrageous', 'Just can't have that in professional rugby, but unfortunately that is the case', 'Referee decide he was going to square up in the second half - gave them, I think, four penalties in a row' and 'How much is the fine? I'll have to check with my accountant... whatever the fine, I'll pay twice. I thought it (the refereeing) was outrageous'. He was fined and ordered to apologise."
Asked for his thoughts at his name getting mentioned in the sanctioning section at the Erasmus hearing, England boss Jones said: "I have got no idea what you are talking about, mate."
When it was explained to him it had something to do with an incident in 2007 regarding comments he made about scrums, he added: "I really don't know what you are talking about, mate. I can remember getting fined in 2007 and I paid the price for not showing the respect I should have shown and I have learned from that. I made a mistake and I learned from that. I haven't encroached on that area again and that is all I can say, mate. I don't know what you want me to say."
Ironically, one of the other six cases referenced by the Erasmus judicial committee involved Richard Cockerill, the new England assistant, when he was coach of Leicester in 2009. It stated: "He entered the technical area and threatened 'this bloke is f***ing s**t', 'you are all a bunch of useless c***s' and 'I’m going to slag this c**t off to every f***ing newspaper going, you watch me'. He admitted both charges and was suspended from match-day coaching for four weeks. The suspension from matchday contact (direct and indirect) with his team and match officials was on matchdays."
Latest Comments
The winner breaks into the (key) top 6 in the World rankings and locks the other out (Australia will lead Scot by 1.6 points if they win). Australia won't get a chance to improve until next years RC so this match is vital. Scotland must hold the line for their part.
Australia are obviously well capable of beating Ireland but with accumulating fatigue becoming a factor I expect an all out performance from Australia tomorrow with Ireland viewed as a bonus.
It will be hopefully a cracker but this is the type of match that Scotland must start winning to take that step up that they crave.
Go to commentsAgree.
Ireland are off their feet at the majority of their attacking rucks. Its so common that commentators don't even notice it. We hear about "clear outs" and "clean outs", which don't exist in the Laws (the correct word is "binding"), and the obligation to "endeavour to stay on your feet" is nowhere to be seen.
Ireland is not the only team to adopt this coached flopping and diving at attacking rucks, but its clearly part of their quick ruck ball strategy.
No need for law changes here. We just need refs to award penalties when players don't endeavour to stay on their feet.
Go to comments