Elton Jantjies breaks silence on Boks omission
Elton Jantjies says he “supports” the decision not to include him in the Bok squad for the upcoming November tour.
Jantjies has been in headlines since he was sent home ahead of the Springboks’ Rugby Championship match against Los Pumas in Argentina in September after media reports suggested the flyhalf had an affair with team dietician Zeenat Simjee.
On Tuesday, South Africa’s Director of Rugby Rassie Erasmus explained that a lack of game time was the reason why Jantjies will not go on tour. On that same day, a 26-man squad was unveiled for a training camp in Stellenbosch and Johan Goosen was the only player listed as a flyhalf.
Jantjies opened up on the Bok management’s decision in an Instagram post on Friday.
“Given the wide reporting regarding my omission from the Springbok squad and clarification from the coaching staff that I was not up for selection for the November tour, I would like to place it on record that I fully understand support the decision,” said Jantjies.
“The fact of the matter is that I have not played rugby since the Rugby Championship and that in the last few weeks I have kept to my public and personal promise to seek professional help and focus on my mental health to ensure that I get my personal life and career back on track.
“It was the best decision I’ve ever made.
“I’ve been training throughout, and I’m in a good space mentally and physically.
“I have received fantastic support from a therapeutic team with whom I have been working closely to ensure that my personal welfare remains my top focus and priority, and I know it will require hard work and a huge effort to remain on this path.
“However, I’m fully committed and hope to return to the rugby field as a better man and player.
“I have no doubt this decision will benefit me personally, my rugby career, my family, and SA’s faithful rugby supporters.”
Latest Comments
Actually the era defining moment came a few years earlier. February 2002 to be precise, when Michael D Higgins as finance minister at the time introduced his sports persons tax relief bill to the dial. As the politicians of the day stated “It seems to be another daft K Club frolic born in Kildare amongst the well-paid professional jockeys with whom the Minister plays golf” and that the scheme represented “a savage uncaring vision of Ireland and one that should be condemned”. The irfu and Leinster would be nowhere near the position they are in today without this key component of the finances.
Go to commentsIt is crystal clear that people who make such threats on line should be tried and imprisoned. Those with responsibility in social media companies who don’t facilitate this should be convicted. In real life, I have free speech to approach someone like Reinach and verbally threaten him. I am risking a conviction or a slap but I could do it. In the old days, If someone anonymously threatened someone by letter the police would ask and use evidence from the postal system. Unlike the Post, social media companies have complete instant and legal access to the content in social media. They make money from the data, billions. Yet, they turn a blind eye to terrorism, Nazi-ism and industrial levels of threats against individuals including their address and childrens schools being published online all from ananoymous accounts not real speech. They claim free speech. The fault is with the perps but also social media companies who think anonymous personas posting death threats constitutes free speech.
Go to comments