1
England camp 'massively disruptive' to derby preparations
By Jon Newcombe
Northampton Director of Rugby Phil Dowson has spoken about how his team's preparations for this Saturday's 254th East Midlands derby against Leicester have been impinged by England's Autumn Nations Series training camp.
The Gallagher Premiership champions had seven players away for the first three days of this week, the most of any club, and would have had one more absent had Alex Coles not been injured.
Saints' England contingent amongst Steve Borthwick's 36-strong ensemble included forwards Trevor Davison and Tom Pearson and backs Fraser Dingwall, Tommy Freeman, George Furbank, Ollie Sleightholme and Fin Smith.
Dowson admits the timing and length of the camp was not ideal ahead of such a big weekend of fixtures.
"It has a massive disruption. It makes it very difficult to prepare for a derby week. The fact is that we have this big derby weekend and all the players from all the clubs, not just us, have been away for three days, not two days. That has been difficult and to be honest it is the first time it has happened, the first time we have had three-day camps as opposed to two-day camps.
"So it will be interesting to see how we adapt to that and get what we want on Saturday. It has been disruptive, it has been tricky. But a lot of the guys we have had missing are really experienced and have a critical mass of experience under their belts so we are hoping that they can slot back in, and we are confident they can slot back in and get the job done."
Premiership Rugby have been playing the derby weekend up all week, with Gloucester's West Country arm-wrestle with Bath, which precedes the East Midlands showdown, one of the other mouth-watering match-ups. However, the marquee players who could have helped drum up interest have been at Pennyhill Park.
Dowson believes it is unfortunate and hopes such "teething problems" will be ironed out once the new Professional Rugby Partnership agreement has had time to bed in.
"I think this camp was probably organised prior to when the fixture list came out and this was going to be a derby weekend. The fact that the two clash isn’t ideal. Even for the nuts and bolts of it, all the lads are away today. On media day, if you wanted to speak to Fin (Smith) you’d have to go down to Pennyhill Park. It is a little bit bizarre," he said.
"But I think also the new relationship is positive and wants to do the right thing for rugby and it wants to be much more aligned. There are going to be teething issues, I do think this is probably one of them. The clubs that lose a lot of players are massively disrupted for what they are trying to build up in the press for the PRL as the big derby weekend."
Trending on RugbyPass
2
NZ age of dominance is all but over
3
Can New Zealand beat the world's best without Barrett at 10?
4
Leicester Tigers want Sam Costelow back
5
Latest Comments
re-read my comments.
Rassie is giving many more debuts this year than at any previous point since 2019. To whatever extent he is rewarding form now, he rewarded it less before.
Marcell Coetzee was in great form in 2020-21 but wasn't picked. Senatla, Zas, and Grobbelaar were in 2021-22. Daniel du Plessis in 2022-23. Akker van der Merwe and Cameron Hanekom in 2023-24.
Go to commentsOk, so let’s pick the bones out of that steaming pile of opinion!
Firstly I didn’t state that the French psyche has “been impacted by invasion and how that has lead to French teams not touring overseas”. For the record, my opinion comments on the French rugby team touring were “they have close to zero interest in touring, never have and never will. It’s embedded in their dna. It’s just the way they see the world, rightly or wrongly.” and “France just don’t have the traditions of touring and therefore don’t place the same importance to it as most other nations, so this compromise is sensible for them”. Given your propensity to make noise of little to no value with your comments, I guess it’s not too surprising that you have misinterpreted my comments and entirely misquoted me.
Secondly I note that following your earlier baseless assertion that I had levelled personal insults in your direction, you have in fact resorted to exactly this behaviour in your limited and stilted reply above.
Thirdly you have absolutely no idea what my connections are to France and what level of insight I possess regarding French culture, yet still you feel qualified to judge. A textbook example in assuming your presumed knowledge is superior I’d say!
Fourthly you have failed, yet again, to provide ANY opinion on the salient points of the rugby discussion stream. Not at all surprising by this stage but worth highlighting nonetheless.
And finally, your continued stream of noise is tedious, repetitive and entirely unimaginative. Is that really the best you can do???
Go to comments