England facing possible backrow reshuffle
England could be forced into a change in their backrow with Brad Shields looking increasingly doubtful for their Six Nations opener with Ireland in Dublin on Saturday.
Shields pulled out of Wasps' recent Heineken Champions Cup game with Leinster at the Ricoh because of a side strain but travelled to the Algarve to join up with the England squad.
Shields was not involved in training on Tuesday prompting fears he will not be fit in time to make the game at the Aviva Stadium.
The former Hurricanes captain broke into the England squad for the June tour of South Africa and can operate at lock or in the backrow. He was first choice blindside flanker during the Novemnber internationals for matches against South Africa, New Zealand and Australia.
Continue reading below...
You may also like: RugbyPass goes behind the scenes with Zebre Rugby Club
Courtney Lawes operated in the 6 jersey against Japan, however Mark Wilson is likely to get the nod instead, with the player regularly selected in that position for Newcastle Falcons. Wilson was also an impressive performer during the Autumn for England, when playing at number 8 and at openside. With Billy Vunipola likely to return at number 8, it could be the perfect solution to keep Wilson in the team.
Centre Ben Te'o also missed out on training on Tuesday. Eddie Jones will whittle down his 35-man squad later on Tuesday, with his matchday squad set to be named on Thursday.
On Monday it was revealed that Jack Clifford returned home after the backrow suffered a head injury in training.
“Jack took a knock to the head so what we’ve decided to do is to manage him,” said England defence coach John Mitchell.
“It’s not an HIA outcome but it’s more important to manage him, so he’s returned home early as he won’t be able to get through most of the work remaining.”
Watch: Rugby World Cup Japan city guide - Oita
Latest Comments
I don't listen to Nigel Farage. Really not sure where you'd be getting that from. Maybe you should stick to responding to what I've actually said, rather than speculating about my sources.
I'm not sure what you think Putin is going to do. He'll probably conquer Ukraine, but its taken him a long time, and cost him a lot of soldiers. Hitler overran France in a matter of weeks and then started bombing Britain. At this rate Putin might make it to Paris by 2080? I think he'll give up long before then!
I don't see what Stalinist language policy has to do with any of what we're talking about. De-Ukrainization took place in the 1930s, but the genocide of Palestine is taking place in 2025. If your argument is that the invasion of Ukraine is part of a longer history of Russian suppression of Ukraine then you might have a point, but that really just underlines the key difference between Hitler and Putin; Hitler wanted to dominate as much area as possible and so posed a threat to all of Europe, whereas Putin wants to force the assimilation of those who have historically been within the Russian sphere of influence, so only poses a threat to eastern europe and central asia.
"Read and think for yourself."
What would you recommend I read? On the genocide of Palestine I've found Patrick Wolfe's "Settler Colonialism and the Elimination of the Native" and Sai Englert's "Settlers, Workers, and the Logic of Accumulation by Dispossession" especially useful - they might disabuse you of the notion that what we are witnessing is an "authoritarian criminal syndicate" fighting a nation! - rather Zionist genocide is a largely democratic process, arising from a structure of settler colonialism which has no analogue in Ukraine.
Go to commentsAnd they're really playing good rugby,beating every team because they can squat with heavy weights. Not
Go to comments