Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

South Africa vs England - English Player Ratings

The new laws all those lifted and those lifting, regardless of team (Getty Images)

England got their summer series off to a rollercoaster start, racing into a 24-3 point lead in Johannesburg, before imploding late in the first half and ultimately succumbing to a 42-39 loss at Ellis Park.

ADVERTISEMENT

There were plenty of positives for England early in the game and then again later, as they attempted to chase the Springboks down, but it was a performance littered with errors and inconsistencies.

We have run the rule over the England side and rated all the performers, from one to 23.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

 

  1. Elliot Daly5

After nailing a 61m penalty in the opening minutes of the game and cruising in for England’s third try, it quickly began to unravel for Daly. Two turnovers kicked out on the full, a missed grounding of the ball inside his own try-line and defensive errors in conjunction with Brown on the left wing. He redeemed himself somewhat with an excellent defensive read early in the second half that saved a certain try.

 

  1. Jonny May8

Showed good speed and work rate to set up two of England’s three early tries, coming off his wing to set up the second. Arguably too passive in defence for Sbu Nkosi’s second try of the game. Weaved his way to a wonderful try late in the game and gave England a shot at victory with two minutes to play.

 

  1. Henry Slade5

Showed good, quick hands, to help England get the ball wide early but faded out of the game as it went on and South Africa got the ascendancy up front. A frustrating knock-on in a tackle by Faf de Klerk after a significant break in the second half ended a minor swing in momentum towards England, as did one when Slade came back against the grain outside Ford a few minutes later.

 

  1. Owen Farrell6

Provided a clinical secondary option outside of George Ford and was justly rewarded for his playmaking when his support-running brought him a try from a May break in the first half. Kicked well but missed a crucial conversion late on that would have brought England within one score of taking the lead. Like England’s other playmakers, faded as the game went on.

ADVERTISEMENT

 

  1. Mike Brown6

Started brightly, showing good footwork and strength to get over for England’s first try, but then struggled defensively with his positioning and lateral quickness. Defensively grew into the game in the second half but there will still be questions about his and Daly’s respective positions in this XV. Won two turnovers, to his credit.

 

  1. George Ford6

Pulled the strings excellent in the first quarter of the match, fizzing passes that picked apart a narrow Springbok defence. As South Africa began to dominate in the second and third quarters, Ford disappeared from the game, though.

 

  1. Ben Youngs5

A mixed bag for Youngs, who looked bright early with his passing and support-running, but uncharacteristically struggled with his kicks from hand, either not allowing his chasers to compete or failing to find touch. Struggled to keep de Klerk under wraps.

 

  1. Mako Vunipola5

Showed plenty of work rate and stamina and was having an influence in both attack and defence, before a yellow card for a late tackle tarnished what had otherwise been a solid outing.

ADVERTISEMENT

 

  1. Jamie George5

The lineout worked well, in limited opportunities, but George leaked penalties in the first half, twice pinged for failing to roll away at the contact area. Did not influence the game in the loose in the way he would have liked, either.

 

  1. Kyle Sinckler6

Won a penalty from Tendai Mtawawira in the opening exchanges, before settling into a close-fought battle between the two. Came under pressure in the second half when the fresh legs of Steven Kitshoff came on to the pitch and didn’t manage to have the impact in the loose he would have wanted.

 

  1. Maro Itoje5

Leaked penalties in the first half and got caught out on the fringes by the effervescent Faf de Klerk. Indiscipline carried on in the second half, both at the breakdown and with high tackles. He was England’s primary lineout jumper, though, and had 100% success with George at the set-piece. Stretched over for a pivotal try late on, a score that few others would have had the reach to make.

 

  1. Nick Isiekwe6

The lock was the unlucky player to get the shepherd’s crook in the first half when England began to implode and they sent for the experience of Brad Shields. He led the line with good speed in the 35 minutes he was on the pitch and can count himself unfortunate to be the player sacrificed.

 

  1. Chris Robshaw5

Not the bounce-back performance from a forgettable outing against the Barbarians that Robshaw wanted. Worked hard for 80 minutes but couldn’t exert any major influence as a carrier or at the breakdown. Struggled to stop physical South African carriers on the gain-line, too.

 

  1. Tom Curry6

A busy, industrious performance, albeit without the turnovers that many fans, perhaps unfairly, demand of any England seven. A nice burst in the second half showed his potential with ball in hand, too, but an ankle injury saw him replaced shortly after.

 

  1. Billy Vunipola6

The N8 was reliable under the South African kick-offs and brought an ability to break the Springbok defensive line as a one-out carrier. Couldn’t rip off any carries for big gains but showed signs of improving fitness as he continues his comeback from injury.

 

Replacements

 

  1. Luke Cowan-Dickie6

Connected successfully with his jumpers on both of his throws shortly after replacing George. Had his final lineout stolen, with England in South Africa’s half and only three points down.

 

  1. Joe Marlern/a

Short cameo after Vunipola’s sin-bin period ended. Limited scope to impact the game.

 

  1. Harry Williams6

Only had the one scrum to have a go at Kitshoff. Worked hard in the loose, particularly at the breakdown.

 

  1. Brad Shields6

Arrived at the 35-minute mark for Isiekwe and was most prominent for being the player England sent up to compete against the Springboks lineouts.

 

  1. Nathan Hughes6

A couple of powerful carriers after he came on but failed to clear-out Kitshoff in the 75th minute, which earned South Africa a penalty and saw them take the lead from seven to ten points.

 

  1. Ben Spencern/a

Only came on with five minutes left to play and had little chance to influence the game.

 

  1. Piers Francisn/a

Arrived with Spencer and faced the same limited opportunities.

 

  1. Denny Solomonan/a

The same situation as Spencer and Francis.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video

South Africa vs Black Ferns XV | Women's International | Full Match Replay

Play Video

Namibia vs United Arab Emirates | Asia/Africa Rugby World Cup Play-off | Full Match Replay

Play Video

Lions Share | Episode 5

Play Video

Classic Wallabies vs British & Irish Legends | First Match | Full Match Replay

Play Video

Did the Lions loosies get away with murder? And revisiting the Springboks lift | Whistle Watch

Play Video

The First Test, Visiting The Great Barrier Reef & Poetry with Pierre | Ep 6: The Ultimate Test

Play Video

KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

Play Video

New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 25 minutes ago
Andy Goode: Aussie comments didn't cover them in glory

Yes I was happy with the refs ruling of arrival (and that the tackled player wasn’t obligated to release the ball immediately) but if you see the wide angle you can note how Morgan dives to get there in time.


I don’t mind your (or the refs) view, but what Morgan said is accurate. Both Mils and Beaver agreed on the breakdown, and you will also get the same view from Aotearoa Rugby Pod guys for a pretty unanimous NZ view.

Sometimes when both players are low its a rugby collision and this is one of those times.

Not recently. In the SR finals and AB v Arg series weve seen players clearly bent 90 at the waist still be penalised, only when the attacker does something the ref sees immediate mitigation and rules a rugby incident. Tizzano didn’t offer that he was always in the position Morgan aimed to collect him in.


Happy to not throw the rule book at these situations but the precent is that they are in these situations.

many tries out wide the player is allowed to be tackled while diving

They are diving for the line, not to avoid being tackled.

“In principle, in a try scoring situation, if the action is deemed to be a dive forward for a try, then it should be permitted. If a player is deemed to have left the ground to avoid a tackle; or to jump, or hurdle a potential tackler, then this is dangerous play and should be sanctioned accordingly.”

You can read Nicks article for an updated discourse on this though.

30 Go to comments
J
JW 1 hour ago
New Zealanders may not understand, but in France Test rugby is the 'B movie'

But he was wrong, he had to take back what he said. But maybe this only happened because he came out and was honest with his initial plans?


He’s simply in a position where he should be far more professional.


I don’t really follow much media, especially SM, but again, I’ve not seen anyone complaining. Plenty of ridicule and pointing out things like it being disrespectful to the game, but as far as the English language goes, that’s not complaining. Nick Bishop for instance hasn’t been complaining, he’s simply saying Galthie made a bad decision for France’s prospects (which when the common reply is ‘thats how it is’).


Complaining would be views expressing that the FFR should have put the tour back a week so that all T14 finalists could attend. Complaining would be saying they’ve been robbed of seeing the worlds best stars. Complaining would be saying players can simply take extra weeks off from T14. I’ve only seen advice and suggestions that these are things France need to look-at-for-the-future.


Basically I tried to communicate with French fans because they don’t understand what’s being communicated. ALL reactions I have seen shared here by French supports have all seemed way over the top compared what I’ve seen expressed about this tour.

the players are expected to play in too many matches, for too many minutes, and need more rest and recovery time.

This is the message I have been sharing. So something needs to happen, whether thats France pull out of more Internationals or rest players from more domestic games, who knows, but I also don’t think what they have now is working. It’s obviously much better than 3-4 years ago, but they appear to want to work even harder at it like you say. Personally I’ve only seen LNR be reasonable, I hear much less of their other internationals being denied/influenced not to play, so I imagine that they will give even further (as I can’t really see France pulling out the other international windows as well).

147 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING What Jac Morgan said moments after clear-out will only anger Wallabies fans What Jac Morgan said moments after clear-out will anger Wallaby fans