Rassie Erasmus reveals 3 point plan to save rugby
Springboks director of rugby Rassie Erasmus says he wants World Rugby to introduce two referees as part of a three-point refereeing plan to improve the sport.
The South African predicts rugby could be heading for 'trouble' if it doesn't move to clean up the grey areas of the game that frustrate so many viewers and put off potential new fans. Despite his highly publicised spat with World Rugby in the aftermath of the British & Irish Lions series, Erasmus wants more officials involved in Test rugby.
Writing in his Mail on Sunday column Erasmus calls for a radical rethink of how the breakdown and the scrum is officiated, and for the length of time kickers take to kick to be properly policed.
"The idea of two referees sounds radical and it has been tried, but it can work if done correctly. If it’s efficient and non-intrusive, it could make a massive difference around the tackle/breakdown area.
"The breakdown is so complicated for players, coaches, referees and fans alike. As a referee, you need five pairs of eyes to see what is going on at a breakdown — otherwise you are guessing," wrote the outspoken South African.
Scrums are another area of the game in which the 49-year-old believes another set of eyes are needed.
"For international rugby, why not form a group of world-class scrummaging experts — former players or coaches — to serve as specialist scrummaging referees?" asks Erasmus.
According to the column, scrum experts would be allowed to roam the sidelines and then run onto the pitch to officiate scrums when the set-piece is contested, even if the former front rowers used as scrum experts would have to be kept relatively fit to execute the role.
"Get them in the gym so they are on and off the pitch quickly. It would be their only job, so they would have no impact on the rest of the game.
"There are about 20 scrums a match so you could even put a microphone on them and link them up to the TV commentary team so the viewers understand what’s going on. "
He also wants the 'shot clock' on kicks to be more strictly managed. Currently, penalties must be taken within 60 seconds and conversions within 90 seconds.
"We are regularly involved in matches where the kicker goes 20 seconds over the allowance," bemoaned the former Munster coach. "If there are six kicks at goal in a match, that could waste two minutes of ball-in-play time. Put a countdown clock on the big screens and if the time runs out then they lose the kick.
"If we want to see more ball-in-play time then we need to make sure there is less ball-out-of-play time. If a team goes into a huddle before a lineout, stop the clock. If a guy goes down to tie his shoelaces or take a drink before a scrum, stop the clock. We could easily increase the ball-in-play time by between seven and 10 minutes by enforcing the laws as they are written and again no one will have to adapt to any law changes."
Erasmus also wants the sport to adopt the long-talked-about global calendar, which he believes will put teams on a level footing going into Test matches.
"If we had a global season, everyone could start adapting on one specified date and nobody is playing catch up."
Latest Comments
I think we need to get innovative with the new laws.
Now red cards are only 20 minutes, Razor should send Finau on a head hunting mission to hospitalise their 10 with a shoulder to the chops.
Give the conspiracy theorists a win.
England played well enough to win but couldnt score when they needed to and couldnt defend a couple of X-Factor moments from Telea which was ultimately the difference. They needed to hold the ball more and make the AB's make more tackles. Territorially they were good for the first 60. Defending their lead and playing pragmatic rugby in the last 20 was silly. The AB's always had the potential to come back. England still have a long way to go, definite progress would have been shown had they won but it seems they are still stuck where they were shortly after the six nations and their tour to NZ
Go to comments