Ex-Pumas skippers Creevy and Pichot weigh in on the Pablo Matera controversy
Recently disgraced Argentina trio Pablo Matera, Guido Petti and Santiago Socino have received the support from a number of former Pumas captains. The three players were suspended on Tuesday and Matera was stripped of his captaincy for social media posts shared between 2011 and 2013 that were described by the Argentinian Rugby Union as “discriminatory and xenophobic”.
Since then, a handful of former teammates have defended the players. It goes without saying that they in no way have supported what the players had previously said, but they have defended their character today.
Agustin Creevy, Argentina’s most capped player and captain, is one former international to attest to the players’ characters. The current London Irish hooker served as Matera’s captain for the majority of the flanker’s career, although their roles reversed during the latter stages of Creevy’s 89-cap Test career.
Creevy played extensively alongside Matera and Petti for Argentina and played with Socino with the Jaguares. In an Instagram post in response to the recent events, he said that their tweets “do not represent them at all”.
He also defended the reputation of rugby, which has been dragged through the mud in recent days in Argentina due to additional criticism they received for not honouring football legend Diego Maradona appropriately.
It only goes to show that all glory is fleeting in rugby in Argentina as Matera was enshrined in folklore only two weeks ago after Argentina's first victory over the All Blacks. Creevy wrote this message in both Spanish and English: “I deeply regret what happened this week with regard to Argentinian rugby. I have the need to express myself with the intention that my words are taken with respect because it is from a place of respect that I say them.
"As a group, we know each other. I know Pablo, Guido and Santiago, and I know who they are today. The sordid tweets they wrote years ago do not represent them at all. They have acknowledged it themselves, felt ashamed and apologised. All people make mistakes, and athletes are not exempt from that.
"I particularly regret the stigmatisation of our sport. I understand that there are behaviours that embarrass all of us who practice it, but this is a sport, like others, practised by people with errors and virtues. Some serious mistakes, yes, where you have to work to improve, as in all areas.
"Rugby is a beautiful sport, practised by people who come from different social classes and different parts of the country. I say this because I have lived and experienced it firsthand, it is not a speech or a managed position. Rugby is a meeting point of great diversity, and that is how it should continue to be.
"Is there a place to improve, to evolve, to grow? Sure, and hopefully this job gets done. Hopefully, more and more people help open up rugby more and more, and more and more kids play and share time on and off the pitch. Let's try that sport (and if it is rugby, much better) continue to create bridges.”
Former World Rugby vice-chairman and ex-Argentina captain Agustin Pichot also joined Creevy in showing solidarity with the players while also condemning what they had formerly written.
He wrote: “All three players' tweets were wrong. I believe in their repentance and in their maturation since they wrote it. We have to continue making a deep self-criticism in our sport; this year is showing us that we have to keep improving.
"For me, rugby is not the atrocities that I read or hear; for me, rugby is something incredible and it helps many people to try to be good people and also good athletes.”
This is an ordeal that will tarnish the careers of the three players and something they will carry with them, but they are not being thrown under the bus by their former teammates. Juan Martin Hernandez and Horacio Agulla are two more former Pumas that have echoed the sentiments shared by Creevy and Pichot as the players await their punishment.
Latest Comments
Thanks Ed.
Go to commentsPerofeta came back and was available for the eoyt right? Or was that why Love was in the squad (but got injured in the last week)?
It was such a frustrating year. Perofeta looked a service stop gap until Jordan was fit, but then got injured. Plummer was selected because of Pero's injury and dmac shat the bed in the second half in Australia but Clarke (?) got himself binned at the 65 min mark so Plummer couldn't come on (at least with the risk adverse Razors thinking) when he was planned to.
So many other exciting opportunities that could have happened without injuries, but then theyre probably balanced by knowing Sititi probably wouldn't have been given a chance without multiple injuries happened.
Go to comments