Exactly what Michael Hooper said to referee Romain Poite
Australia’s loss to Wales on Sunday in the Rugby World Cup offered a number of controversial moments, which chiefly left Michael Cheika despondent.
None was more controversial than the penalty awarded to Wales for a carry by Samu Kerevi in which he led with the forearm into the throat of defender Rhys Patchell.
Since then there has been a backlash from those that feel the game has gone too far in trying to be safe, and Kerevi himself has even joked that he may need to move to rugby league if carries like his are now illegal.
Wallabies captain Michael Hooper was one to object during the game, and can be heard in referee Romain Poite’s microphone contesting the decision to give a penalty.
Poite initially told Hooper: "This is the third penalty, we have had a penalty for high tackle, and offsides. Please make sure your players play in the law".
Hooper then asked: “Can we not run into the tackle anymore?”
He also said that it was “terrible tackle technique” from Patchell and that it was a “very good carry” from Kerevi.
"That's just terrible tackle technique and you can't carry the ball if that's going to be the ruling."
"We can’t run into tackles because we’ll get pulled up all day."
Poite responds: "This is my call.
"You can't touch the throat of the opponent."
In a RWC that has already been defined by high tackles, this recent incident surrounding Kerevi has further muddied the waters.
The Wallabies centre did lead with his forearm and it did end up in Patchell's throat, but Hooper is right in calling out his tackle technique.
The fly-half was high going into the tackle, and actually came perilously close to being punished himself.
Moreover, leading with an arm is commonplace in rugby, and calling attention to this incident will only lead to outrage down the line if someone is not punished for a similar offence.
Cheika himself loosely referred to Peceli Yato leading with his forearm when being tackled by Reece Hodge, something the Australian was banned for three weeks for.
This incident was dangerous, and it is easy to see why the officials deemed it to be a penalty, but it is equally as easy to see Hooper and Cheika's perspective as they felt a good carry was penalised.
Anthony Watson looks ahead to Argentina on Saturday and discusses the competition for places on the wing.
Latest Comments
I was introduced to crypto investment by an investor I met on Telegram. I liked the program and decided to join the investment platform. At the beginning, I invested and made profits which I continued doing until the website disappeared. I could not withdraw any funds before the incident happened but luckily a friend of mine that works with FBI introduced me to ( WALLET CONNECT (AT) USA (.) C O M) WhatsApp +(1 (412) 225‑ 5918 ) and they came just in time and assisted me to recover all the money. They did a great job and they were very professional to work with. It's quite unbelievable but it happened. We got our money back through their system assistance.
Go to commentsYes that’s what WR needs to look at. Football had the same problem with european powerhouses getting all the latin talent then you’re gaurenteed to get the odd late bloomer (21/22 etc, all the best footballers can play for the country much younger to get locked) star changing his allegiance.
They used youth rep selection for locking national elifibilty at one point etc. Then later only counted residency after the age of 18 (make clubs/nations like in this case wait even longer).
That’s what I’m talking about, not changing allegiance in rugby (were it can only be captured by the senior side), where it is still the senior side. Oh yeah, good point about CJ, so in most cases we probably want kids to be able to switch allegiance, were say someone like Lemoto could rep Tonga (if he wasn’t so good) but still play for Australia’s seniors, while in someone like Kite’s (the last aussie kid to go to France) case he’ll be French qualified via 5 years residency at the age of 21, so France to lock him up before Aussie even get a chance to select him. But if we use footballs regulations, who I’m suggesting WR need to get their a into g replicating, he would only start his 5 years once he turns 18 or whatever, meaning 23 yo is as soon as anyone can switch, and when if they’re good enough teams like NZ and Aus can select them (France don’t give a f, they select anybody just to lock them).
Go to comments