'Factually incorrect': Reds' Wilson officially warned over ref accusations
Queensland Reds flanker Harry Wilson has received an official "reminder" from Super Rugby Pacific for his comments blasting referee Brendon Pickerill's handling of teammate Connor Vest's serious neck injury.
Vest spent two nights in a Dunedin hospital after he suffered a fractured neck when tackled during the Reds' 35-30 loss to the Highlanders last Friday, with the visitors' angered that no rival player was cited.
Wilson claimed Pickerill tried to "rush" Vest from the field, and his comments prompted a review of the incident by SANZAAR.
Tournament organisers issued a statement on Wednesday denying the referee's actions were inappropriate and addressing Wilson's comments.
"The review has found that at no stage did the match referee, Brendon Pickerill, attempt to hurry the review of the injury or the removal of the player from the field," the statement read.
"The comments attributed to Harry Wilson of the Reds in the media are factually incorrect and whilst they may have been well intending in support of a teammate, he has been issued with a reminder that care must be taken with public comments not to impair the public confidence in the integrity of match officials."
Super Rugby Pacific said the tackle incident was reviewed after the match by the independent citing commissioner, who found no foul play had occurred by the tacklers.
Vest walked from the field but scans later revealed the fracture. The Reds were hopeful he would not need surgery.
The Reds claimed they previously made three unsuccessful requests for retrospective reviews of dangerous tackles on their players to SANZAAR this season and were set to meet with World Rugby to discuss their issue.
Latest Comments
I think we need to get innovative with the new laws.
Now red cards are only 20 minutes, Razor should send Finau on a head hunting mission to hospitalise their 10 with a shoulder to the chops.
Give the conspiracy theorists a win.
England played well enough to win but couldnt score when they needed to and couldnt defend a couple of X-Factor moments from Telea which was ultimately the difference. They needed to hold the ball more and make the AB's make more tackles. Territorially they were good for the first 60. Defending their lead and playing pragmatic rugby in the last 20 was silly. The AB's always had the potential to come back. England still have a long way to go, definite progress would have been shown had they won but it seems they are still stuck where they were shortly after the six nations and their tour to NZ
Go to comments