'Factually incorrect': Reds' Wilson officially warned over ref accusations
Queensland Reds flanker Harry Wilson has received an official "reminder" from Super Rugby Pacific for his comments blasting referee Brendon Pickerill's handling of teammate Connor Vest's serious neck injury.
Vest spent two nights in a Dunedin hospital after he suffered a fractured neck when tackled during the Reds' 35-30 loss to the Highlanders last Friday, with the visitors' angered that no rival player was cited.
Wilson claimed Pickerill tried to "rush" Vest from the field, and his comments prompted a review of the incident by SANZAAR.
Tournament organisers issued a statement on Wednesday denying the referee's actions were inappropriate and addressing Wilson's comments.
"The review has found that at no stage did the match referee, Brendon Pickerill, attempt to hurry the review of the injury or the removal of the player from the field," the statement read.
"The comments attributed to Harry Wilson of the Reds in the media are factually incorrect and whilst they may have been well intending in support of a teammate, he has been issued with a reminder that care must be taken with public comments not to impair the public confidence in the integrity of match officials."
Super Rugby Pacific said the tackle incident was reviewed after the match by the independent citing commissioner, who found no foul play had occurred by the tacklers.
Vest walked from the field but scans later revealed the fracture. The Reds were hopeful he would not need surgery.
The Reds claimed they previously made three unsuccessful requests for retrospective reviews of dangerous tackles on their players to SANZAAR this season and were set to meet with World Rugby to discuss their issue.
Latest Comments
How can a key player get 7 for 35 minutes, when after his departure the scrum dissolved?
Go to commentsThat is certainly one way to do it, though I'm not sure you have looked for the unintended consequences.
I think the game is actually in a really good place atm, it has a really good balance between attack and defense. Changing to that ruling would heavily swing it into the defenders favour, so you need to come up with another law change favouring attack to keep an equal balance.
Go to comments