Fans fear the latest doping case is 'tip of the iceberg'
With Stade Francais' forward Hendré Stassen potentially facing a four-year ban for doping, fans on Twitter have given their thoughts on drugs in rugby.
The 21-year-old failed a drugs test in mid-May after a game against Montpellier, testing positive for using a performance-enhancing drug.
Since arriving in Paris in October from the Blue Bulls, Stassen was nothing short of a revelation for the club, playing 18 times for Heyneke Meyer’s side.
Former player, now commentator, Andy Goode wrote on Twitter of how impressive Stassen was last season, as have other fans, but understands now why the player was able to make such an impact.
Rugby has long tried to hold on to the reputation that it is a clean sport and, while this is not the first case of doping, it is rare.
Stassen’s compatriot Chiliboy Ralepelle tested positive for drostanolone in 2014 while with Toulouse, serving a two-year ban. He returned to professional rugby with the Sharks, where he failed another drugs test.
Furthermore, there is a growing number of players failing tests at lower levels of the game. However, this news has not shocked many fans on social media, as they feel this is the “tip of the iceberg”.
The fact that this is a South African player is least surprising, as some fans have alluded to this being commonplace for younger players there as there has been a rise in steroid use at schools level.
Players in the past have implied that this may be going on in some areas of the game, but nothing specific has ever been said. Likewise, fans here are also suggesting that this may be rife in the game. This is what has been said:
Adding to the drama is that Stassen is under a police investigation back in South Africa and could be charged with assault with the intent to cause grievous bodily harm for an incident outside a club in Pretoria in June.
WATCH: The insightful RugbyPass documentary with Nemani Nadolo, the Fijian who plays for Top 14 club Montpellier
Latest Comments
Completely and utterly agree mate. The whole George Ford kick substitution issue pales into significance compared to the issue that we didn't get anywhere near the bloody tryline except with an interception. Our attack is nonexistent. If we're only getting a maximum of 3 points on an entry to the red zone it doesn't matter who's on the damn bench! Borthers and Wigglesworth spent their careers trotting after kicks and taking set pieces, that's how they think rugby should be played. The scoreline was incredibly flattering, England were poor.
Go to commentsBest article ever
Go to comments