FFR confident Noves won't win the enormous sum he's demanding in damages following sacking
French rugby officials are confident they can successfully contest Guy Noves' E3million claim for unfair dismissal when his case comes before a tribunal hearing on February 14.
Noves only won seven of his 21 matches in charge of France, the final straw coming with a November 2017 23-all draw in Paris with Japan.
He was sacked the following month by French Rugby Federation (FFR) and replaced by Jacques Brunel, but he is now seeking compensation worth around €2.9m, a sum consisting of the remaining wages due and various damages.
A €3m pay-out would be a costly lump sum to stump up if they were to lose, but the FFR are looking forward to the tribunal with confidence.
“We are waiting for this hearing with a lot of serenity,” said FFR lawyer Joseph Aguera to French newspaper Le Parisian.
It is believed the French federation will allege that Noves had a brittle attitude towards his players and his relations were too distant with the Top 14 clubs.
The FFR legal team will rely on the statements of players, including in the press, to outline a “bad atmosphere” within the French squad.
They are also preparing to raise a number of legal points in relation to Noves’ contract which was due to run through to the end of the 2019 World Cup.
Apparently no mention of France’s recent results will be made by the FFR in their defence case as French fortunes haven’t improved since Noves’ axing.
They have won just three of their 12 matches so far under Brunel and fell victim to an opening round Six Nations defeat to Wales last Friday despite holding a 16-0 interval lead.
Noves believes the FFR’s failure to comply with employment procedures by the FFR, who initiated his dismissal without any prior interview, has given rise to his claim for significant damages.
Latest Comments
It is if he thinks he’s got hold of the ball and there is at least one other player between him and the ball carrier, which is why he has to reach around and over their heads. Not a deliberate action for me.
Go to commentsI understand, but England 30 years ago were a set piece focused kick heavy team not big on using backs.
Same as now.
South African sides from any period will have a big bunch of forwards smashing it up and a first five booting everything in their own half.
NZ until recently rarely if ever scrummed for penalties; the scrum is to attack from, broken play, not structured is what we’re after.
Same as now.
These are ways of playing very ingrained into the culture.
If you were in an English club team and were off to Fiji for a game against a club team you’d never heard of and had no footage of, how would you prepare?
For a forward dominated grind or would you assume they will throw the ball about because they are Fijian?
A Fiji way. An English way.
An Australian way depends on who you’ve scraped together that hasn’t been picked off by AFL or NRL, and that changes from generation to generation a lot of the time.
Actually, maybe that is their style. In fact, yes they have a style.
Nevermind. Fuggit I’ve typed it all out now.
Go to comments