Fiji run rampant in final quarter blitz of Japan for Pacific Nations Cup crown
On September 21, the Asahi Super Dry Pacific Nations Cup Final took place at Hanazono Rugby Stadium in Osaka, where the Fiji national team defeated Japan 41- 17, securing their sixth title since 2018.
The match began with a kickoff from Fiji's fly-half, Caleb Muntz. Fiji was the first to strike. “Japan has been very fast in the first 20 minutes. We tried to contain that with physicality,” said Fiji's captain, hooker Tevita Ikanivere.
They matched Japan physically and applied pressure, but Japan responded with double tackles. In the 7th minute, Japan opened the scoring with a penalty goal, but Fiji responded quickly in the 9th minute.
The first try went to Japan. In the 20th minute, a scrum near the half-line saw Fiji drop the ball, resulting in a scrum for Japan. From there, centre Dylan Riley feigned a pass, kicked into the open space behind, and scored a try himself. Fullback Seungsin Lee converted the kick successfully, giving Japan a 10-3 lead.
In the 30th minute, Fiji built nine phases in front of Japan's goal line, and centre Inia Tabuavou placed the ball in the in-goal area, but the TMO ruled a knock-on before the try, resulting in no try.
Over the next few minutes, Japan pressed into Fiji's territory, but fly-half Harumichi Tatekawa’s kick was intercepted, and Fiji's wing, Vuate Karawalevu, sprinted from their own half to score, levelling the match at 10-10 at halftime.
While Japan managed to stop Fiji's attacks in the first half, they found themselves defending more in their own half during the second. In the 5th minute, it appeared Fiji had scored, but the TMO ruled an obstruction, resulting in no try once again.
Japan made early substitutions, with captain fly-half Tatekawa leaving the field and Junta Hamano, making his first cap, entering.
“I wanted to increase the pace of our attack,” Eddie Jones said, explaining the early substitution. Lee switched from fullback to fly-half, but Japan struggled to regain momentum without experienced players.
Fiji took the lead with a penalty goal in the 15th minute, making it 10-13.
In the 59th minute, Fiji maintained an attack through seven phases. Japan, who had been matching Fiji physically, began to slow down. Eventually, with an overload on one side of the field, Ponipate Loganismasi, also a member of the sevens team, scored in the right corner. Muntz converted the kick, breaking the deadlock at 20-10.
Despite the deficit, there was still a strong support presence for Japan in the stands, with spontaneous applause encouraging the team.
Just after, in the 62nd minute, Japan faced a golden scoring opportunity. Having been forced to battle mostly in their own half, a penalty against Fiji allowed Lee to find a nice touch, presenting a prime opportunity near the goal line. However, they failed to catch the throw at the back of the lineout, giving Fiji the chance to launch a 50/22 kick, putting Japan in their corner.
In the 66th minute, Fiji executed a lineout near Japan's goal and maneuvered around the forwards to score through Albert Tuisue in the left centre. The TMO confirmed the try, followed by a successful goal kick, extending Fiji's lead to 27-10.
Japan's lineout error, which led to the 50/22 situation, marked a turning point in the match.
Fiji went on to add two more tries, stretching the score to 41-10, but Japan's wing, Malo Tuitama, managed to score the team's second try in the 77th minute, concluding the match at 41-17.
Fiji's back-row, Meli Derenalagi, was named Player of the Match, while Fiji's fly-half Caleb Muntz was awarded Player of the Tournament.
Head coach Mick Byrne reflected, “In this tournament, we were able to extend our lead in the second half. It was a great opportunity for young players to experience test matches.”
Latest Comments
They would improve a lot of such a scheme were allowed though JD, win win :p
Go to commentsI rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.
He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.
The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).
The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.
The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).
It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.
Go to comments