Former Bok boss breaks rank to support World Rugby's Erasmus decision
Former Springbok head coach Nick Mallett has broken ranks, broadly coming out in support of the World Rugby's decision to sanction current Bok Director of Rugby Rassie Erasmus.
The governing body had earlier in the week given Erasmus a two-month ban for publicly criticising Australian referee Nic Berry over his performance in the first Springboks-Lions Test.
Mallett - so often the voice on reason among South Africa's at times partisan commentary on the Erasmus saga - bemoaned the length of time it took to arrive at the decision, but admitted that their conclusion was hard to argue with.
“I think a couple of things. First of all, it took a tremendous amount of time before this came out and that’s a real disappointment,” Mallett told a Super Sport panel over the weekend. “If a player gets sent off for a red card, it’s done within a week. Obviously, they were very concerned with what happened. They were very concerned about the defence that SA Rugby and Rassie were going to put up. They didn’t want to slip up on this at all and they wanted to make sure they crossed their Ts and dotted their Is with regard to the report.
“It’s taken ages, four months I think, before it has come out.
"They have come down very, very heavily on Rassie. If you look at what they were asked to adjudicate on, it’s hard to argue that they were incorrect."
Mallett, who coached the Springboks between 1996 and 2000 said that the South African public have confused legitimate criticism of Nic Berry's performance with the fact that Erasmus is obliged to follow World Rugby protocols.
“When you go through his tape, it’s not a question of whether he was correct if Nic Berry had a poor game, which I still believe Nic Berry did have a very poor game. That wasn’t what they were allowed to adjudicate on. They had to adjudicate on whether Rassie broke World Rugby laws in terms of the way in which directors of rugby and coaches deal with decisions.
“In South Africa, we have slightly confused the issue. We’ve said that perhaps they should have looked and seen what the mistakes were that Nic Berry made and that should mitigate against what Rassie did. Unfortunately, when you are an affiliate of World Rugby, you have to obey World Rugby’s laws.
“As a rugby player you can say ‘I don’t like the maul therefore I am going to collapse it’ but you are always going to get penalised if you collapse the maul. You might not like the law, but you have to play by it. Rassie is a director of rugby and he has to abide by World Rugby laws and he was found that he didn’t. He has been heavily sanctioned for that.”
Latest Comments
Given rugby union's complicated history with apartheid, I don't think it would be appropriate to select a player who played for Tel Aviv, so its probably for the best that Borthwick's back 3 selections are pretty settled.
Beard looks like a great player, but he's yet another 13, when what we really need is a 12. I'm also concerned that he's a player who thrives in loose games, when he's given lots of space to run, which is what he'll get against Japan. So if Bortwick picks him he'll probably play really well, but that actually won't tell us anything about whether he's international standard or not. Wales in the 6N might be an even easier game than Japan, but its likely to be more structured, so would give Beard a tougher test.
It probably would be good to see Clark and Willis given a shot. England really need a better number 8 option than Dombrandt, and a solid 4th choice second row - I'm not sure if Clark is that yet, but he's young so good grow into the role. Unfortunately he's never played 6 before, but I don't think that's an issue given that Martin, Itoje, and Chessum all have a lot of game time there.
Go to commentsYeah defence is still an issue but a big turnaround in the quality of the attack and having a decent maul puts pressure on teams not to give away penalties close to their try lines. The ABs I thought lacked their killer instinct on the weekend, going for penalities rather than tries like they did. The Wallabies down to 14 men still went for the maul rather than trying to be conservative with a penalty and use some time and it totally turned the game back in their favour.
Go to comments