Former Wallabies coach under fire for criticism of Australian journalist and RA CEO
Former Wallabies coach and current on-air personality Alan Jones has come under fire after criticising the abilities of journalist Beth Newman and Rugby Australia CEO Raelene Castle.
Jones' personal attack on the Newman has caused a backlash from fellow rugby media members.
The 75-year-old radio host referred to Newman as a "hack" and questioned her qualification to be commenting on the Wallabies after reading her reports in the official programme of the Wallabies and All Blacks clash at Eden Park on Saturday night.
Jones also took aim at Castle, claiming she "knows nothing about the game".
Other commentators jumped on social media to defend both Newman and Castle.
Sports journalist Roy Ward tweeted: "I feel utter disgust at Alan Jones even speaking Beth Newman's name. There is only one 'mouthpiece' in this discussion and it's the bloke who thinks using the N word on radio is proper conduct," while Fox Sports' Christy Doran defended Newman's position and said that Newman has covered rugby for at least three years on a full time basis.
Jones wrote in his column for The Australian that Newman was a "paid mouthpiece" of the Australian Rugby Union.
"I picked up the rugby programme for the test match last Saturday in New Zealand," Jones wrote.
"The world of rugby was present at the game. They would read the programme. And some hack, Beth Newman, is writing on Australian Rugby. You guessed it — she's a paid mouthpiece for Australian Rugby.
"How the hell would her utterly irrelevant musings represent an appropriate evaluation to the world of the state of the Wallabies? And what on earth must the rest of the world think about us when such drivel passes for authoritative comment."
Jones coached the Wallabies from 1984 to 1987 and most recently coached when he led the Barbarians in 2017. During his time as a broadcaster he has been involved in a number of defamation cases.
In other news:
Latest Comments
I’m looking forward to attending the Twickenham match, I don’t think it will have a bearing on the outcome of the grand prize itself but it will tell us more about each teams’ preparation and game plan. It’s hard to look past one of the big four (I’m including Canada) lifting the trophy in 2025 but sport is a curious thing, there will still be twists and turns in road ahead.
Go to commentsThe better side seems to be the losing side a lot these days. As far as narrative goes. Must be the big emergent culture of “participation awards” that have emerged in nanny states. ”It looked like New Zealand would take the game from there but lapses in execution let South Africa get back into the game. New Zealand’s goal kickers left five points out there, including a very make-able penalty on the stroke of half”. Sounds like a chronic problem… I wonder how the better team has lapses in concentration and execution? Or are those not important factors in the grand scheme of total performances? In 2023, the ABs at least didn’t give up a lead to lose. They just couldn’t execute to get the points and take the lead. This Baby AB result points to a choke - letting the game slip through your fingers. In the words of the great Ricky Bobby’s dad - “If you’re not 1st you’re last!” Loosely translated - if you didn’t win, you’re a loser.
Go to comments