Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Four England talking points after they blow it again down the finish

By Liam Heagney at Allianz Stadium, Twickenham
Freddie Steward looks on during Saturday's England loss to South Africa (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Not even Tarantino at the peak of his filmmaking powers could have concocted the crazy England rugby revenge plot twist suddenly confronting the RFU next weekend at Allianz Stadium.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was 23 months ago when the blazers abruptly cut Eddie Jones loose, believing they were moving on to better and brighter things with Steve Borthwick at the helm of the England men’s national team.

Now these very same English administrators who sacked Jones are facing the dubious prospect of potentially seeing the Australian swagger back into the joint and inflict what could be the mortal blow to Borthwick’s reign.

Video Spacer

Rassie Erasmus sums up South Africa’s performance against England

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
      Video Spacer

      Rassie Erasmus sums up South Africa’s performance against England

      Springbok head coach Rassie Erasmus did not want to sound arrogant when describing his team’s win against England at Twickenham on Saturday.

      The script was for ‘Borthers’ to take the team all the way through to the 2027 Rugby World Cup, steeled by the five-year deal agreed upon when he was headhunted from Leicester to stabilise England after they had lost their way under Jones.

      It was a loss to the Springboks that was the finish of Jones, an Autumn Nations Series featuring just one win, one draw and two defeats forcing the RFU to act ruthlessly. But if that Jones record was bad, where does that leave Borthwick’s current luckless run?

      Team Form

      Last 5 Games

      5
      Wins
      5
      5
      Streak
      5
      18
      Tries Scored
      15
      106
      Points Difference
      188
      2/5
      First Try
      2/5
      2/5
      First Points
      2/5
      2/5
      Race To 10 Points
      2/5

      Saturday’s loss to the Springboks was a fifth in succession for England, the third in a row at home for the first time since 2006. Seven Ls in nine if you spin the lookback back to late February.

      The head coach insisted in the aftermath that he believed he retained the full support of the RFU and that they were still committed to his long-term project. A defeat to Jones’ Japan, though, would surely result in blood on the floor.

      ADVERTISEMENT

      Borthwick’s team haven’t yet been booed off at Twickenham in recent weeks. Their performances in respective two, five and nine-point losses were far from dire; they were within a whisker of beating New Zealand and Australia, and they were in front of South Africa 12 minutes into the second half of another cracking entertaining match.

      However, you have to imagine that if Jones serves up the glacially cold revenge of a sixth successive England loss, then the home fans would surely give the Borthwick the bird – as happened to Jones two years ago – and force the RFU to publicly come out and either back or sack their man before the next Six Nations.

      That would be a devilish situation for the RFU to find itself in, and the potential for it to happen will ensure an intriguing build-up to next Sunday’s series ender. In the meantime, what is to be made from losing to the Springboks? Here are the RugbyPass England talking points from their fifth loss in five:

      The Felix fudge
      It’s the elephant in the room, what the f*** really went down with Felix Jones. Praise was heaped on the new-joiner earlier this year after he arrived in from helping the Springboks to a second successive Rugby World Cup win.

      ADVERTISEMENT

      “A work ethic that is astounding,” enthused Borthwick during the early days of the partnership that ultimately only lasted eight matches before the Irishman rocked the England set-up with his resignation.

      Borthwick stubbornly insisted that Jones would remotely work out his notice, focusing on “specific projects regarding analysis” from his Dublin base.

      However, that fudge was shown up to be nonsense this week when newly promoted senior coach Richard Wigglesworth revealed he had no contact with Jones even though it was his old team, the Springboks, who were coming to London town.  That admission was terrible for the optics of Borthwick’s England set-up.

      In the meantime, the aggressive blitz that Jones had implemented has gone up in smoke with Borthwick’s wedding usher, Joe El-Abd, now installed as defence coach. That smacks as too cosy an arrangement.

      A dozen tries have been leaked in three matches, South Africa exposing Freddie Steward to add four to the respective three and five tries scored by New Zealand and Australia, tarnishing the credibility of Borthwick’s environment as Jones wasn’t the only high-profile departure.

      Adding to the intrigue was the head coach’s ropey defence that he wasn’t privy to the alleged bullying of staff and strained relationships with players that occurred on Jones’ watch – allegations made in Danny Care’s new autobiography about a time when Borthwick was one of Jones’ assistants. He can’t not have sensed what was going on.

      The final question at Saturday’s post-game media bunfight was about the Felix Jones situation, though, and what impact it was having. “I am very confident with the whole management team we have coaching,” retorted Borthwick with a ‘nothing to see here’ spin.

      “Ultimately we are getting in positions to win the games which says there is a lot of things being done really, really well… we will be a better team because of these painful experiences.”

      Attacking weakness
      There has undoubtedly been an improvement in the England attack as eight tries have been scored over the last three Saturdays, but as good as that sounds they have a wounding issue turning pressure into points in the opposition’s 22.

      Look at how they squandered chances to take advantage of South Africa being a man down for 10 minutes and the gap at what should have been a reduceable nine points.

      They were blunted and damningly held scoreless, a failure that was a poor reflection given how rivals such as Ireland are devastatingly good in these power play situations where the opposition is a man short.

      Overall, they had 10 entries into the Springbok 22 throughout the match yet only averaged 1.7 points per visit in contrast to the visitors whose eight entries averaged 3.2 points.

      Against Australia, England visited 12 times for an average 2.8 points, less than the Wallabies who averaged 4.3 points from their nine visits, while the numbers versus New Zealand were seven visits for 1.8 points compared to seven Kiwi visits for an average of 3 points.

      England are scoring, but not at the giddy rate they need to due to their porous defence on the edge, and their decision-making in the opposition 22 must be sternly reviewed, especially as their latest second half produced a meagre three points.

      Why Maro Itoje didn’t point at the posts to cut the two-score deficit late on instead of having Marcus Smith kick to the corner was something that didn’t reflect well on him.

      In a results business, they simply can’t continue to be outscored in the closing parts of matches and can’t keep relinquishing leads. It ultimately only damages confidence.

      Steve’s pearl-clutching
      One thing that especially grates about Borthwick’s description of his team is how they are always described as “young” and “learning” compared to the opposition who are always more experienced and streetwise. It’s pearl-clutching that doesn’t wash.

      Yes, there are some fascinating new additions to the set-up performance boss Conor O’Shea hasn’t been shy in touting that ‘generational talents’ are coming through the pipeline.

      But the truth is that Borthwick’s England are not inexperienced. A dozen of Saturday’s starters were inherited from the Jones era, with eight of them even involved in the run to the 2019 Rugby World Cup final, not new players handed debuts on the current coach’s watch.

      When you added in Saturday’s six ‘inherited’ subs, it made for a match day 23 in which just five players have been newly capped in 2023 or 2024. Even if England were predominately young and learning, which they aren’t, they still need to be winning here and there to instil the belief that they really do have what it takes to become the best.

      Put another way, you wouldn’t get away with losing five on the bounce in New Zealand, South Africa or Ireland without calls for the coach’s head, but Borthwick seems to think that ‘young’ and ‘learning’ gives him a free pass. It shouldn’t.

      The generous wedge he is earning demands a forensic performance review of his stewardship, even if a win is finally delivered next weekend against the Japanese.

      Related

      Jamie and George
      How often do we keep getting reminded by coaches and players that rugby is a 23-man game? Too bloody often. Take England skipper Jamie George. He produced his best performance of the autumn on Saturday yet was still hooked on 49 minutes and proceeded to defend his replacement.

      “It certainly doesn’t leave a leadership void,” insisted the captain who a year ago, without being captain played the full 80 minutes in a number of Tests at the World Cup, so crucial was be seen at the time to the England cause.

      “We have leaders all the way across the field. If you look at the team that was on at the end, there was plenty of leaders in that team.

      “If you speak to every player they will always want to play every moment of every game but the hooker jersey is an 80-minute performance across two players and when you have got the likes of Luke Cowan-Dickie or Theo Dan coming off the bench then the things they can add and I think you saw that with Luke Cowan-Dickie tonight.”

      We don’t think we did. Cowan-Dickie’s had a lack of sharpness which contributed to England’s flawed rescue effort, so why didn’t we see more of George? What is going on behind the scenes with this new ‘hook him early’ tactic?

      It’s a general theme of the Borthwick era, his ineffective use of the bench for the greater good, and Saturday’s latest evidence included George Ford being left unused and kicking his heels.

      The veteran – an enhanced EPS contracted player on big RFU dosh – had two error-ridden cameos over previous weekends and would hardly have had Twickenham cheering his introduction if he came on, but why select him as a sub if he wasn’t going to be used?

      It was essentially the waste of a pick, proof that rugby isn’t the 23-man game it is constantly made out to be and a decision that undermined Borthwick’s ‘young’ and ‘learning’ claims about his squad. Imagine if Fin Smith was on the replacements and what he would have taken from getting a run.

      Related

      ADVERTISEMENT
      LIVE

      Whanganui vs The Classics

      Classic Wallabies vs British & Irish Legends | First Match | Full Match Replay

      Did the Lions loosies get away with murder? And revisiting the Springboks lift | Whistle Watch

      The First Test, Visiting The Great Barrier Reef & Poetry with Pierre | Ep 6: The Ultimate Test

      KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

      New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

      USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

      France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

      Lions Share | Episode 4

      Trending on RugbyPass

      Comments

      9 Comments
      H
      HU 250 days ago

      guess those who don't like England will be very supportive of Steve Borthwick to stay .....

      T
      TI 250 days ago

      Steward is a defensive liability at the international level.

      Dude costs England two tries per game. How many proofs does Borthwick need to see?

      C
      CM 250 days ago

      Meanwhile Scotland blood a 19yr old as Borthwick ignores all the form backs and forwards. Borthwick's choice of coaches and players has proven to be awful. Ford fails yet is still chosen. Thank goodness Ben Youngs retired or Borthwick would play him.

      T
      Tom 250 days ago

      He would still have Youngs and Farrell if they were available.

      C
      CW 250 days ago

      I'll say it again. The England players are really good but they have shown consistently that they are not world beaters in every position. New World Cup cycle. Bring in new side based on young players who can be word beaters in 27. This team won't. Pollock, Fasogbon, Hill, Tizzard, Fitz-Harding for Skipper, Ibitoye, Lesowzki, Kenningham, Tom Willis, Retain the Smits and Mitchell. Current pack is overrated, especially the 4 - 8. You need to be able to defend and carry and be up for the fight. 12 13 and wing channels are one dimensional. If England doesn't change it will be also-rans for a long time.

      c
      ch 250 days ago

      You can't have wholesale criticism of Borthwick when he brings on Ford for Smith and then criticise him when he doesn't. Why was Ford on the bench? In case Smith was injured of course.

      D
      DP 250 days ago

      A conspicuous absence of chest thumping and jeering in opposition faces from Maro Itoje… seldom gets to enjoy these unsportsmanlike traits against the Boks who manhandled him from start to finish. A most enjoyable and rewarding sight…

      T
      Tom 250 days ago

      Why Maro Itoje didn’t point at the posts to cut the two-score deficit late on instead of having Marcus Smith kick to the corner was something that didn’t reflect well on him.

      Hindsight bias. This was the correct decision. England needed to score a try at some point to win the game. SA were down to 14 and had just been given a warning for consecutive penalties that they would be sent down to 13 if the penalties continued. If that isn't the right time to kick to the corner, I don't know what is...

      A
      AV 250 days ago

      100%

      Load More Comments

      Join free and tell us what you really think!

      Sign up for free
      ADVERTISEMENT

      Latest Features

      Comments on RugbyPass

      J
      JW 26 minutes ago
      Half-back depth is the flaw in 'Razor's' 4-4-4 Rugby World Cup plan

      Well there’s a couple of distinctions here that are important aren’t there?


      First though like I replied to Tk where does it say theres need to test vets, or proven reliable players? It is simply ‘test quality’.


      Now, I have created a list that I think is test quality, so all weve got to do is upskill the missing pieces right? No. Razor might not mean to have given every player half a dozen matchs but he will want to have identified and assured himself that each individual is indeed test quality. So yes, plays like Darry and Lord may still be included in a few squads and used so he’s happy to include them as say 5th and 6th ranked locks, but that doesn’t mean he needs to go to the same level to ensure for himself the 7th and 8th ranked locks.


      He might be happy basing performances off SR Finals, or organizing an AB XV match against a team like France or SA with similar locking depth (even organizing say Warner Dearns to be part of the Japan XV etc), and I’m sure they’re going to have a very large squad over in South Africa for two months.


      I don’t think he is quite in the same predicament as SA to have to rest top stars. And this is obviously just goal setting, they’re supposed to be hard. As you can see by the context around this series, arbitrary targets like everyone getting some minutes are made. That could also simply be how he ensures he has met the 4. So hookers would be ticked, as he’s already used 5 at test level. If you looked at the Baabaas SA game you’d see Beehre performing like an accomplished test player, that already makes 7 locks with more than 2 full seasons to go. You take the point BA was making about Marshalls previous remarks about Razor want players to be able to play 3/4/5 different positions, that would mean if Razor was really happy with Finau at lock last week he already has 8 test quality locks as well, etc, etc.


      TLDR sorry for the big reply, it’s just a goal, the teams not going to suddenly fail if he doesn’t reach it, I think theres many means and many players for him to be comfortable in getting 4 in each position. He’s obviously not going to be able to get 4 proven, hardened test players in each by then, no.

      135 Go to comments
      LONG READ
      LONG READ Half-back depth is the flaw in 'Razor's' 4-4-4 Rugby World Cup plan Half-back depth is the flaw in 'Razor's' 4-4-4 Rugby World Cup plan