Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Fresh twist in doping case of disgraced Springbok Aphiwe Dyantyi

(Photo by David Davies/PA Images via Getty Images)

Springbok Aphiwe Dyantyi has reportedly opted to appeal his four-year doping ban in a fresh twist to the ongoing saga. The South African Institute for Drug-Free Sport (SAIDS) handed Dyantyi a four-year ban in December after the wing failed to prove that he took multiple performance-enhancing drugs in error as he purported.

ADVERTISEMENT

SAIDS said in a statement on December 14 that it “confirms and accepts” the decision rendered by the doping hearing panel on the Dyantyi matter.

“The three-person panel accepted the guilty plea of the athlete to the doping charge,” the statement said.

Video Spacer

Goodbye 2020:

Video Spacer

Goodbye 2020:

“They found that the athlete had failed to satisfy the burden of proof to establish that his positive dope test was not intentional.

“The Panel relied on the framework for sanctions in the World Anti-Doping Code that outlined a sanction of four years for the doping offence in this matter.”

Dyantyi has effectively been banned from participating in sport from 13 August 2019 – when he was provisionally suspended – to 12 August 2023.

SAIDS also stated, “the athlete’s rights are reserved to seek relief through lodging an appeal should he believe that he has substantive grounds for an appeal”.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dyantyi had 21 days in which to lodge an appeal and according to SA Rugby mag, the wing has opted to fight the decision.

SA Rugby Mag reported that the appeal was filed within the prescribed deadline and he has outlined his grounds for appeal.

SAIDS will now liaise with the appeal board and the athlete’s legal team to co-ordinate a sit-down date for the hearing.

Following the news of the ban, Dyantyi’s agent, Gert van der Merwe has always remained adamant that it “makes no sense”.

ADVERTISEMENT

In December, Van Der Merwe told the Rapport that an appeal is possible. However “the problem is that there are costs associated with it”.

An appeal will be a costly affair for the 26-year-old, who has not received a salary for the past 18 months.

In 2019 news first broke that Dyantyi’s mandatory B sample had come back testing positive for three banned substances following a national training camp.

His mandatory B sample confirmed the presence of banned substances methandienone, methyltestosterone and LGD-4033 in June 2019.

Consequently, the 2018 World Rugby Breakthrough Player of the year was suspended from all forms of rugby and missed the 2019 World Cup in Japan.

ADVERTISEMENT

Toshiba Brave Lupus Tokyo vs Kubota Spears | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 Final | Full Match Replay

Saitama Wild Knights vs Kobe Steelers | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 Bronze Final | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 42 | Investec Champions Cup Final Review

Spain's Incredible Rugby Sevens Journey to the World Championship Final | HSBC SVNS Embedded | Episode 14

Australia vs USA | Pacific Four Series 2025 | Full Match Replay

New Zealand vs Canada | Pacific Four Series 2025 | Full Match Replay

South Africa vs New Zealand | The Rugby Championship U20's | Full Match Replay

The Game that Made Jonah Lomu

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SteveD 1 hour ago
Bulls book Leinster URC showdown but injury to Springbok tarnishes win

Dear heaven, what a pathetic and embarrassing game of rugby. As a Sharks supporter back in the wonderful Ian Mac days, I was even hoping, for SA rugby’s sake, that the hated Bulls would win so that they might at least give Leinster a bit of a game, but frankly, when a team almost has three players in the sinbin at the same time, then I imagine I might not be able to stand watching them get thrashed in Dublin next Saturday evening if they carry out the same Northern Transvaal stupidity of the old days. WTF did they think they were doing?


As for the Sharks, there's maybe a light at the end of the tunnel however, if they just follow my advice. I haven't watched their recent games but now I see where their problems lie. Three of them in fact. Firstly, get rid of Plumtree for - at the minimum - selecting reasons (2) and (3). Secondly and thirdly, get rid of the Hendrikse brothers. Who on earth thinks that those two are top quality rugby players needs to be in an asylum, or they'll likely send a lot of the Sharks supporters there instead, if they haven't already. They are useless - I mean, FFS, the so-called flyhalf can't even select boots that don't slip when he's taking multiple placekicks (to say stuffall about trying to put penalty kicks from 60 metres over - and failing - when a freaking lineout might have produced a try, even if he missed the conversion) - and I can now see why the team of ‘real’ Boks are doing so badly, having two idiots at scrumhalf and flyhalf. If they stay in the squad, Sharks supporters should rather cash in their season tickets and go watch the best English-speaking (and sixth all-round overall) SA rugby team, Westville Boys High, than suffer so much pain at King's Park.

1 Go to comments
J
JW 2 hours ago
Broken hand or not, Richie Mo'unga is still New Zealand's best 10

I agree that he chose to go - but when he was starting for the All Blacks and it was clear that Scott Roberston was going to be the coach in 2024

That’s not the case at all. There was huge fear that the continued delaying was going to cause Robertson to go. That threat resulted in the unpresented act of appointing a new coach, after Richie had left I made add that I recall, during a WC cycle.

Mo’unga was finally going to get the chance to prove he was the better 10 all along - then he decides to go to Japan.

Again, No. He did that without Razor (well maybe he played a part from within the Crusaders environment) needing to be the coach.

He’d probably already earned 3-4 million at that stage. The NZRU would’ve given him the best contract they could’ve, probably another million or more a year.

Do some googling and take a look at the timelines. That idea you have is a big fallacy.

I also agree to those who say that Hansen and Foster never really gave Mo’unga a fair go. They both only gave Mo’unga a real shot when it was clear their preferred 10’s weren’t achieving/available; they chucked him in the deep end at RWC 2019, and Foster only gave him a real shot in 2022 when Foster was about to be dropped mid-season.

That’s the right timeline. But I’d suggest it was just unfortunate Mo’unga (2019), they probably would have built into him more appropriately but Dmac got injured and Barrett switched to fullback. Maybe not the best decisions those, Hansen was making clangers all over the show, but yeah, there was also the fact Barrett was on millions so became ‘automatic’, but even before then I thought Richie would have been the better player.


Yep Reihana in 2026, and Love in 2025! I don’t think Richie had anything to prove, this whole number 1 thing is bogus.

129 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Tokyo statement lends credibility to rumoured Hurricanes signing Tokyo release lends credibility to Dearns rumours
Search