Galthie breaks silence on Bastien Chalureau controversy
Fabien Galthie has responded to the controversy around the selection of Montpellier's Bastien Chalureau.
The second row was called up to replace Paul Willemse who was pulled out of tournament with injury last week.
Chalureau was convicted of a racially motivated assault of two rugby players in 2020.
The conviction saw Toulouse tear up his contract but he since rebuilt his career in Montpellier.
He has always denied the incident was racially motivated.
Left wing political groups in France have called for him to be dropped from the team. La France Insoumise Deputy Thomas Portes has led calls for forward to be deselected despite already representing France several times since the incident.
"The first thing is that Fabien Galthié should not have called him,” Portes said. “With my colleague François Piquemal, we are going to contact the Minister of Sports on Monday so that she can intervene and ask the French team not to select him.”
“We cannot accept today to have a rugby player in the French team who has been condemned for racist acts."
Galthie addressed the issue at team's on-arrival media conference.
"We have said the same thing now for four years and we carry this mission with heart and commitment: we have to unite and share with French rugby and all French people.
"For four years, racism has had no place in our team, it has no place in rugby. Integrity is a fundamental value of our team and our sport. Bastien has informed us of this affair and firmly and formally denies the allegations. Proceedings are underway."
"He's been with us regularly for a year now, since last autumn. Before selecting a player, we try to get to know him better, meet him, share our way of living and playing rugby."
Galthie says the controversy hasn't effected the team: "The World Cup isn’t for wimps. You have to be strong."
"We're very disappointed for Paul [Willemse], who has worked very hard in his preparation. Over the past four years, he has suffered recurrent muscular problems. We did everything we could to support him: the medical team, the trainers, the nutritionists.
"He was injured last Wednesday on an individual programme. We decided to replace him with Bastien Chalureau. He's going to get better and join the list of players on standby because the tournament lasts seven weeks.
"We preferred to make this decision because we have three games to play in a fairly tight 20-day period. We feel we need four second rows.
"At the beginning of June, a group of 26 players came to work with us. Then we worked with 42. Every injury or withdrawal is difficult for the player concerned - obviously. [It’s hard] for the whole group, the staff, and the players. Unfortunately, we’ve had to prepare for that. It’s part of our journey."
Latest Comments
Wow, have to go but can’t leave without saying these thoughts. And carlos might jump in here, but going through the repercussions I had the thought that sole nation representatives would see this tournament as a huge boon. The prestige alone by provide a huge incentive for nations like Argentina to place a fully international club side into one of these tournaments (namely Super Rugby). I don’t know about the money side but if a team like the Jaguares was on the fence about returning I could see this entry as deciding the deal (at least for make up of that side with its eligibility criteria etc). Same goes for Fiji, and the Drua, if there can be found money to invest in bringing more internationals into the side. It’s great work from those involved in European rugby to sacrifice their finals, or more accurately, to open there finals upto 8 other world teams. It creates a great niche and can be used by other parties to add further improvements to the game. Huge change from the way things in the past have stalled. I did not even know that about the French game. Can we not then, for all the posters out there that don’t want to follow NZ and make the game more aerobic, now make a clear decision around with more injuries occur the more tired an athlete is? If France doesn’t have less injuries, then that puts paid to that complaint, and we just need to find out if it is actually more dangerous having ‘bigger’ athletes or not. How long have they had this rule?
Go to commentsHaha he does the exact opposite of what you’d expect any receiver to do, Brilliant!
Go to comments