Gareth Anscombe weighing up big-money switch to Premiership
Star Wales playmaker Gareth Anscombe has been linked with a big-money switch from Pro14 outfit Cardiff to ambitious Premiership club Bristol.
The Rugby Paper is reporting that the experienced 27-year-old pivot, who helped steer Wales to a Six Nations Grand Slam title last month, has been offered a deal in the region of £500,000-per-year to make the move to the Bears.
With 26 tests to his name, the shift would bring an end to his four-year-long test career as only foreign-based players with 60 test caps or more are eligible to still play for Wales.
Anscombe's contract with the Blues expires at the end of the season, and has previously spoken out about the inequalities faced by Welsh players compared to the riches that exist within the English and French rugby landscapes.
"We've only got a 10-year window to look after ourselves and the important thing is you don't want to look back with regrets," he told The Times a fortnight ago.
London-based club Harlequins are another side interested in securing Anscombe's services, so a move outside of Wales at the end of the 2018-19 club campaign isn't entirely out of the question.
Should he decide to leave Cardiff for either Bristol or Harlequins, the World Cup in five months' time would act as Anscombe's swansong event in the international arena.
A transfer to Bristol would see Anscombe reunite with former Blues coach Pat Lam, who coached the New Zealand-born first-five at Super Rugby level in 2012.
Anscombe isn't the only option on Lam's first-five wish list, with the 50-year-old coach looking into the prospect of bringing in Irish-born USA first-five AJ MacGinty from Premiership rivals Sale Sharks.
Watch - RugbyPass speaks to Michael Cheika:
Latest Comments
The only benefit of the draft idea is league competitiveness. There would be absolutely no commercial value in a draft with rugby’s current interest levels.
I wonder what came first in america? I’m assuming it’s commercial aspect just built overtime and was a side effect essentially.
But the idea is not without merit as a goal. The first step towards being able to implement a draft being be creating it’s source of draftees. Where would you have the players come from? NFL uses college, and players of an age around 22 are generally able to step straight into the NFL. Baseball uses School and kids (obviously nowhere near pro level being 3/4 years younger) are sent to minor league clubs for a few years, the equivalent of the Super Rugby academies. I don’t think the latter is possible legally, and probably the most unethical and pointless, so do we create a University scene that builds on and up from the School scene? There is a lot of merit in that and it would tie in much better with our future partners in Japan and America.
Can we used the club scene and dispose of the Super Rugby academies? The benefit of this is that players have no association to their Super side, ie theyre not being drafted elshwere after spending time as a Blues or Chiefs player etc, it removes the negative of investing in a player just to benefit another club. The disadvantage of course is that now the players have nowhere near the quality of coaching and each countries U20s results will suffer (supposedly).
Or are we just doing something really dirty and making a rule that the only players under the age of 22 (that can sign a pro contract..) that a Super side can contract are those that come from the draft? Any player wanting to upgrade from an academy to full contract has to opt into the draft?
Go to commentsUse club rugby.
You’ve got the perfect structure to run your 1A and 1B on a quota of club representation by Province. Have some balance/reward system in place to promote and reward competitiveness/excellence. Say each bracket has 12 teams, each province 3 spots, given the Irish Shield winner once of the bottom ranked provinces spots, so the twelve teams that make up 1A are 4 from Leinster, 3 each from Connacht and Munster, and 2 from Ulster etc. Run the same rule over 1B from the 1A reults/winner/bottom team etc. I’d imagine IRFU would want to keep participation to at least two teams from any one province but if not, and there was reason for more flexibility and competitveness, you can simply have other ways to change the numbers, like caps won by each province for the year prior or something.
Then give those clubs sides much bigger incentive to up their game, say instead of using the Pro sides for the British and Irish Cup you had going, it’s these best club sides that get to represent Ireland. There is plenty of interest in semi pro club cup competitions in europe that Ireland can invest in or drive their own creation of.
Go to comments