1
Gloucester, Worcester statements: Clubs respond to hearing outcome
By Liam Heagney
Both Gloucester and Worcester have issued club statements following the decision on Thursday evening by an independent Sport Resolutions panel regarding the outcome of the investigation into the late cancellation of the March 25 Gallagher Premiership match between the two sides.
It was just five hours before the scheduled 7:45pm Friday night live TV kickoff that it was confirmed that Worcester were unable to field the necessary six front row players in their matchday 23 in order for the game to proceed.
Four weeks later, it was decided that Gloucester should be awarded a 20-0 victory and five match points from the cancelled fixture and this lifted George Skivington's team from seventh to fifth place heading into their match on Friday at Bristol, leaving them poised just two points behind Exeter in the fourth and final semi-final playoff place.
A Gloucester statement in the wake of the outcome of the Sport Resolution hearing read: "Gloucester is pleased to receive confirmation from the independent panel and Premiership Rugby that we have been awarded a match result of 20-0 and five league points as a result of Worcester cancelling our fixture at Kingsholm on Friday, March 25.
"We are grateful to the independent panel who have been thorough in their investigations into this matter. Gloucester will continue to liaise with Premiership Rugby following the release of the full judgement to determine the next steps in regard to compensation. We look forward to now turning our attention to key fixtures ahead of us as we approach the end of the season competing in three competitions."
Releasing only an initial verdict, Premiership Rugby explained that it would publish the full judgement when completed by the panel, hopefully within the next week. This delay informed the Worcester response to the hearing outcome. Their statement read: "Warriors respect the process and decision made by the independent panel convened by Sports Resolutions. We shall await the publication of the full reasoned decision before making further comment."
It was Wednesday afternoon at his weekly media briefing that incoming Worcester director of rugby Steve Diamond predicted that the points split outcome from the hearing would be Gloucester four and Worcester two, but that turned out not to be case.
Trending on RugbyPass
2
All Blacks XV player ratings vs Munster
3
Suaalii strikes awe as Wallabies lose midfielder
4
Scott Robertson responds about handling errors
5
Latest Comments
Nah, that just needs some more variation. Chip kicks, grubber stabs, all those. Will Jordan showed a pretty good reason why the rush was bad for his link up with BB.
If you have an overlap on a rush defense, they naturally cover out and out and leave a huge gap near the ruck.
It also helps if both teams play the same rules. ARs set the offside line 1m past where the last mans feet were😅
Go to commentsYeah nar, should work for sure. I was just asking why would you do it that way?
It could be achieved by outsourcing all your IP and players to New Zealand, Japan, and America, with a big Super competition between those countries raking it in with all of Australia's best talent to help them at a club level. When there is enough of a following and players coming through internally, and from other international countries (starting out like Australia/without a pro scene), for these high profile clubs to compete without a heavy australian base, then RA could use all the money they'd saved over the decades to turn things around at home and fund 4 super sides of their own that would be good enough to compete.
That sounds like a great model to reset the game in Aus. Take a couple of decades to invest in youth and community networks before trying to become professional again. I just suggest most aussies would be a bit more optimistic they can make it work without the two decades without any pro club rugby bit.
Go to comments