1
The good, the bad and the rugby – Lions Tour 2017
By Jamie Wall
The dust has barely settled on the insanity that was third and ultimately un-deciding test between the All Blacks and British & Irish Lions. While all the talk today is about the call that Roman Poite made in the dying stages, let’s not let it overshadow what has been a fascinating tour.
The last month has captured the attention of an entire nation. Here’s some of the highs and lows of the journey:
GOOD – The crowds. Even though the first game in Whangarei was preceded by the sort of weather that would have Noah rounding up two of every animal for a boat ride, the skies cleared and the people flocked. A full house at Okara Park set the tone for the rest of the series, with every stadium filled to the brim.
BAD – The build up for the Lions. One week together clearly wasn’t nearly enough, as evidenced in their slack start to the tour. The most annoying part about their blundering against the Barbarians and then Blues was that it meant that they completely shut up shop against the Crusaders – a win, yes, but a very turgid watch.
GOOD – The Blues. If anyone should be thanking the schedule-makers, it’s the men from Auckland. They got a disjointed Lions side in the first week of the tour and duly dispatched them in front of their biggest crowd in quite a while. Next week they go back to being the worst NZ Super Rugby team, though.
BAD – The Chiefs. Last year their B team smoked Wales, this year they couldn’t even hold onto the ball for longer than 30 seconds. Taking nothing away from the Lions, though, they treated the home team with the ruthless contempt they deserved.
GOOD – Maro Itoje. Whenever this guy does anything remotely good, we heard his own personalised chant go up. Which ended up being a great many times.
BAD – Concussions. Courtney Lawes was knocked out cold against the Highlanders and sat out exactly 0 games in the aftermath. Alun Wyn Jones was knocked out even colder in the third test, and somehow returned to the field of play. I'm no doctor, but that doesn't seem right?
GOOD – Ngani Laumape. After ploughing through the Lions for the Hurricanes, Laumape found himself starting his first test about half an hour before he should’ve and with one less team mate to help him. After a bulldozing performance in that game, he showed his wider skill set with a more distributing role in the third.
BAD – Gatland being called a clown. It wasn’t funny the first time, or the second. He got the last (and only) laugh out of the joke though.
GOOD – The Maori All Blacks haka. Spine-tingling, especially through the cloud of mist that rolled in over Rotorua International Stadium as the teams took the field.
BAD – The Maori All Blacks. So the haka was basically the only thing they got right, afterwards they were handed a lesson in physical ball control by the Lions.
GOOD – Jonathan Davies. Not exactly a name that most NZ fans would’ve been talking about too much before the tour, but the big Welshman made linebreaks in every game he played. The road to the Lions’ ultimate successes were paved through the centre channel that he controlled – he was the best player in the test series.
GOOD/ VERY BAD – Sonny Bill Williams. Game winner at Eden Park for the Blues, shockingly stupid red card in the second test. SBW now becomes the only All Black to be sent off on NZ soil, and the first in 50 years to get his marching orders at all.
GOOD – This story isn’t finished! A drawn series for the first time ever – and now we have 12 more years to talk about what will happen next. The guys who will be playing in that series will be mostly all in their first year of high school right now, just have a think about that.
VERY GOOD – Lions fans. They’re loud and proud, but friendly and willing to take the good with the bad. No one thought their team could pull level with the mighty All Blacks, and it was their support that helped ensure the Lions can leave NZ with their heads held high.
Trending on RugbyPass
2
Saracens statement: The outcome of Billy Vunipola investigation
3
Hacjivah Dayimani exits SA following Springbok snub
4
Henry Slade and Exeter Chiefs come to terms
5
Latest Comments
I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.
Go to commentsYeah, and ours is waaay bigger than yours. Just as you's get a semi…oh hold on that never happens
Go to comments