Harlequins and Dave Ward issue statement in wake of spitting controversy
Harlequins and hooker Dave Ward have issued a statement in wake of the spitting controversy that marred yersterday's game with Wasps at Twickenham.
The statement reads: Following the Premiership match between Harlequins and Wasps at Twickenham on 29th December the Club has reviewed an incident involving Dave Ward and Thomas Young in the 10th minute, which led to a yellow card for Ward.
Following this review the Club has decided to give Dave Ward a one game suspension for treading on Thomas Young's ankle.
Harlequins Head of Rugby Paul Gustard said: "We have reviewed this episode as a club and I have spoken with Dave.
Continue reading below...
"We do not coach, condone or accept foul play and on behalf of the team and the Club, I apologise to Thomas, Dai and Wasps for this incident. It was an unnecessary and regrettable incident in what was a tightly contested match at Twickenham."
The Club also reviewed an alleged spitting incident involving Dave Ward and are satisfied that there is no case to answer.
Ward said: "I apologise unreservedly to Thomas Young, Wasps and everyone at Harlequins for my yellow card yesterday.
"I would also like to make clear that I did not spit on another player during the match yesterday. Regardless of what the television footage looks like I know that I have never spat on a player in all my career and will never do so."
Latest Comments
Nah, that just needs some more variation. Chip kicks, grubber stabs, all those. Will Jordan showed a pretty good reason why the rush was bad for his link up with BB.
If you have an overlap on a rush defense, they naturally cover out and out and leave a huge gap near the ruck.
It also helps if both teams play the same rules. ARs set the offside line 1m past where the last mans feet were😅
Go to commentsYeah nar, should work for sure. I was just asking why would you do it that way?
It could be achieved by outsourcing all your IP and players to New Zealand, Japan, and America, with a big Super competition between those countries raking it in with all of Australia's best talent to help them at a club level. When there is enough of a following and players coming through internally, and from other international countries (starting out like Australia/without a pro scene), for these high profile clubs to compete without a heavy australian base, then RA could use all the money they'd saved over the decades to turn things around at home and fund 4 super sides of their own that would be good enough to compete.
That sounds like a great model to reset the game in Aus. Take a couple of decades to invest in youth and community networks before trying to become professional again. I just suggest most aussies would be a bit more optimistic they can make it work without the two decades without any pro club rugby bit.
Go to comments