Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

New Hurricanes pivot Harry Godfrey turning into a gem

Harry Godfrey of the Hurricanes scores a try during the round two Super Rugby Pacific match between Hurricanes and Fijian Drua at McLean Park, on February 22, 2025, in Napier, New Zealand. (Photo by Kerry Marshall/Getty Images)

Thrown into the deep end due to an injury crisis, new Hurricanes starting first-five Harry Godfrey is paying dividends after producing the match-winning try against the Drua in Napier.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Hawkes Bay fullback had the chance to play in front of his home province crowd with the Hurricanes first home game taken to Napier.

Forming a new combination with All Blacks halfback Cam Roigard, the age grade fullback has come into his own as a No.10 with so many players sidelined.

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

Points Flow Chart

Hurricanes win +4
Time in lead
18
Mins in lead
50
23%
% Of Game In Lead
63%
12%
Possession Last 10 min
88%
7
Points Last 10 min
7

Last year’s starter Brett Cameron will miss the entire season with a knee injury, while star fullback Ruben Love is on the recovery path from his own ankle surgery. New recruit Lucas Cashmore suffered a knee injury in pre-season leaving Godfrey as the top option with journeyman Riley Hohepa offering cover.

The unliked pair of 10s combined in the 75th minute to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat with Godfrey crossing in the corner after the Hohepa break.

Earlier, a piece of Godfrey magic was required to spark a comeback with the Hurricanes down 22-12 on the stroke of half-time.

ADVERTISEMENT

The No.10 cut back up the middle to gash the Drua for 50 metres, dragged down just a metre short of the try line. Ex-sevens winger Fehi Fineanganofo scored on the next phase from a quick pick-and-go from the base of the ruck.

Godfrey played a steady hand as Roigard was typically brilliant as the anchor of the Hurricanes attack, producing two try assists with snipes around the base, the first of which was thirty seconds into the game.

His third assist was a fairly basic pass to centre Bailyn Sullivan to win his one-on-one match up close to the line, while the No.9 added a try of his own from close to the line.

Attack

132
Passes
222
100
Ball Carries
150
319m
Post Contact Metres
300m
6
Line Breaks
8

After Godfrey’s 75th minute try took the lead back in the dying stages, his clutch kick from the sideline pushed the lead to four points to force the Drua to chase a try for the win.

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking with Sky Sport after the game, Godfrey said there were ‘mixed emotions’ returning to Bay with such a big local turnout on a cracking day but needing to snatch the game at the death.

“I’m enjoying 10 at the moment, first receiver with a bit more touches on the ball,” he said.

“I’m enjoying driving the boys around as well. We are blessed with a very good backline, anyone from 9 to 15 can jump in behind the pack.

“We are our own worst enemies at times. Obviously dropping the ball quite a bit, loose balls, and you can’t do that against the Drua.

“Like you see, they pounce on it and put us under the pump.”

Download the RugbyPass app now!

News, stats, live rugby and more! Download the new RugbyPass app on the App Store (iOS) and Google Play (Android) now!

ADVERTISEMENT

Pollock Loses Bill, Players Meet Their Roommates & Training in Portugal | Ep 1: The Ultimate Test

Top tackles in Lions Tests

Top 10 inspiring Lions speeches

United States of Rugby | Episode 1 – Welcome to Dawgtown

Top 10 Best Lions Tries of the 2000s

Toshiba Brave Lupus Tokyo vs Kubota Spears | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 Final | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 42 | Investec Champions Cup Final Review

The Game that Made Jonah Lomu

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 1 hour ago
Ex-Wallaby laughs off claims Bath are amongst the best in the world

I ultimately don’t care who the best club team in the world is, so yeah, lets agree to disagree on that.


I would appreciate clarity on a couple of things though:

Where did I contradict myself?

Saying “Trophies matter. They matter a lot. But so does winning games. So does making finals.” is entirely compatible with ranking a team as the best - over an extended period - when they have won more games and made more finals than other comparable teams. It would be contradictory for me to say “Trophies matter. They matter a lot. But so does winning games. So does making finals.” and then completely ignore Leinster record of winning games and making finals.


“You can get frustrated and say I am not reading what you write, but when you quote me, then your first line is to say thats true (what I wrote), but by the end of the paragraph have stated something different, thats where you contradict yourself.”

What you said (that I think trophies matter) is true, in that I said “Trophies matter. They matter a lot. But so does winning games. So does making finals.”. Do you understand that Leinster won more games and made more finals than any other (URC-based) team did under the period under consideration?


“Pointless comparison on Blackburn and Tottenham to this discussion as no-one includes them on a list of the best club. I would say that Blackburns title season was better than anything Tottenham have done in the Premier League. My reference to the league was that the team who finished second over two seasons are not better than the two other teams who did win the league each time. One of the best - of course, but not the best, which is relevant to my point here about Leinster, not comparing teams who won 30 years ago against a team that never won.”

I really don’t understand why you would think that this is irrelevant. You seem to be saying that winning trophies is the only thing that matters when assessing who is the best, but doesn’t matter at all when assessing who is 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, etc.


“What I referred to in my Leinster wouldn’t say the were the best is your post earlier where you said Leinster were the best overall. You said that in two separate posts. Seasons dont work like that, they are individual. Unless the same team keeps winning then you can say they were the best over a period of time and group them, but thats not the case here.”

Well then we’ve just been talking at cross purposes. In that my position (that Leinster were the best team overall in 2022-2024) was pretty clear, and you just decided to respond to a different point (whether Leinster were the best team individually in particular years) essentially making the entire discussion completely pointless. I guess if you think that trophies are the only thing that matters then it makes sense to see the season as an individual event that culminates in a trophy (or not), whereas because I believe that trophies matter a lot, but that so does winning matches and making finals, it makes it easier for me to consider quality over an extended period.

24 Go to comments
M
MT 2 hours ago
Ex-Wallaby laughs off claims Bath are amongst the best in the world

As I said in one of my first replies to you - we can agree to disagree. If you want to leave it no problem. I completely disagree with your ranking of Leinster as the best team in the world. Now you have said you will change it if Bordeaux win the Top 14. Well as Leinster themselves prioritise the CC over the URC and Bordeaux won the CC, how are they not ranked higher by you? Are Leinster one of the best teams, yeah - never said they weren’t. But not the very best team, as the very best team have trophies to show for their seasons. They matter when you discuss the very best.


You can get frustrated and say I am not reading what you write, but when you quote me, then your first line is to say thats true (what I wrote), but by the end of the paragraph have stated something different, thats where you contradict yourself. Just so we are clear, you said you would too on my statement that I would rather be a fan of a team that won a trophy over the three seasons, but end the paragraph saying you would rather be a fan of the team that won the most matches but didn’t win a trophy. Both cant be true. Thats one example of where you contradict yourself.


Pointless comparison on Blackburn and Tottenham to this discussion as no-one includes them on a list of the best club. I would say that Blackburns title season was better than anything Tottenham have done in the Premier League. My reference to the league was that the team who finished second over two seasons are not better than the two other teams who did win the league each time. One of the best - of course, but not the best, which is relevant to my point here about Leinster, not comparing teams who won 30 years ago against a team that never won.


What I referred to in my Leinster wouldn’t say the were the best is your post earlier where you said Leinster were the best overall. You said that in two separate posts. Seasons dont work like that, they are individual. Unless the same team keeps winning then you can say they were the best over a period of time and group them, but thats not the case here.

24 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ ‘Joe’s generally a step ahead’: How Schmidt’s coaching tree branched into Lions brains trust ‘Joe’s generally a step ahead’: How Schmidt’s coaching tree branched into Lions brains trust
Search