'He's a top, top athlete': England's S&C coach names fittest player
Ellis Genge flattening Michael Hooper in one of the enduring images of England’s series against Australia so far was made possible by a conditioning program designed to turn players’ strengths into “super strengths”.
Genge was galvanised for the 25-17 victory in the second Test by provocative comments made by ‘Tongan Thor’ Taniela Tupou in the build up, but the firepower needed to deliver a symbolic carry could not be generated by rage alone.
Instead, it was the product of a training regime overseen by England’s head of strength and conditioning Jon Clarke that takes defining physical attributes and aims to elevate them to a new level.
Whether it is Henry Arundell’s ability to accelerate from jog to high speed in a heartbeat or the unrivalled stamina of Tom Curry, former Great Britain rugby league international Clarke has the task of fine tuning elite athletes.
“Ellis Genge’s acceleration and speed for a front rower is absurd. He’s 118kg and with his acceleration he can beat a lot of people,” Clarke told the PA news agency.
“If you made him do a 10-minute run, he probably wouldn’t come anywhere, but when he accelerates hard there aren’t many who can live with that. Michael Hooper felt it! Once Ellis caught the ball, the force he produced in two metres was incredible.
“There are other players who we need to go for a little bit longer and you want more endurance from them, but for Ellis that’s his strength – his repeat acceleration ability.
“People always ask ‘what is this player’s or that player’s weakness?’. Well we do work on those, but we also try to turn their strengths into super strengths and Ellis is one of those players.”
Eclipsing Genge’s statement carry for sheer wow factor was Arundell’s sensational solo try in the first Test that announced to the world the arrival of an electric player who has been causing a stir in his debut professional season.
Arriving off the bench to make his England debut, Arundell surged between two Wallabies defenders and raced around a third while switching the ball between hands in a moment that united athletic brilliance with rugby instinct.
Still only 19 years old, the London Irish wing has drawn comparisons with Bryan Habana, David Campese and Matt Giteau.
Clarke sees similarities with another great of the game in Jason Robinson – a dual code international who he played with and against – and one attribute above all others stands out.
“Henry is phenomenal. He’s got that combination of pace, power and a good instinctive rugby brain. He’s very, very strong with a low centre of gravity,” Clarke said.
“But the thing that impresses me most is his pick up from jogging to very quick in a very short space of time. If you look at his try, at best he’s jogging when he gets the ball….and then bang. He goes from producing not much force to loads of force very quickly.
“Top end speed isn’t that relevant in rugby apart from kick chases. It’s that pickup of very, very quick acceleration into evasion that gives you separation from other players. Henry’s got that.”
England began the series with Curry at openside but concussion ended his tour after the first Test and he has since returned home, taking with him the best engine in Eddie Jones’ squad.
“Particularly when he’s put a few games back to back, Curry will be at the front,” Clarke said.
“My personal belief with conditioning is that while it’s about capacity, there’s a psychology to it too. What place are you prepared to push yourself to in order to reach that level of fitness?
“Curry would be at top of that as well. He has the training capacity, but his psychology is also incredible. He’s a top, top athlete and also an unbelievable rugby player.
“He’s one of those players who sometimes you have to protect him from himself. You have have to tell him ‘you’re all right, go recover’ because he’s a ‘more guy’ and he’s so driven.
“That’s the art and science of coaching – you’ve got to know who to push, who to pull, who to protect and who needs a bit more.”
England’s integrated approach between strength and conditioning and rugby means Clarke’s role extends to providing Anthony Seibold with assistance in coaching the defence, particularly around ruck defence.
Players are prepared to peak twice each week – a smaller peak for the main training session on Wednesday and then match day itself – and Clarke’s department must “feed in positively to the rugby programme because the rugby is the be all and end all”.
Eventually the 43-year-old former Warrington hooker would like to become a dedicated defence coach, most likely after next year’s World Cup, but the immediate concern is getting the players “fit and strong” for Saturday’s series decider at Sydney Cricket Ground.
Latest Comments
Haha yeah, agreed. Remember Schmidt wasn't heavily involved at that point right? I agree to me it did look more organic, like it players playing naturally, devoid of a lot of the coaching garbage (that includes what Schmidt likes to do, he would have known to be hands off, he can't do much in one week).
Go to commentsA deep question!
First, the point would be you wouldn't have a share of those penalities if you didn't choose good scrummers right.
So having incentive to scrummaging well gives more space in the field through having less mobile players.
This balance is what we always strive to come back to being the focus of any law change right.
So to bring that back to some of the points in this article, if changing the current 'offense' structure of scrums, to say not penalizing a team that's doing their utmost to hold up the scrum (allowing play to continue even if they did finally succumb to collapsing or w/e for example), how are we going to stop that from creating a situation were a coach can prioritize the open play abilities of their tight five, sacrificing pure scrummaging, because they won't be overly punished by having a weak scrum?
But to get back on topic, yes, that balance is too skewed, the prevalence has been too much/frequent.
At the highest level, with the best referees and most capable props, it can play out appealingly well. As you go down the levels, the coaching of tactics seems to remain high, but the ability of the players to adapt and hold their scrum up against that guy boring, or the skill of the ref in determining what the cause was and which of those two to penalize, quickly degrades the quality of the contest and spectacle imo (thank good european rugby left that phase behind!)
Personally I have some very drastic changes in mind for the game that easily remedy this prpblem (as they do for all circumstances), but the scope of them is too great to bring into this context (some I have brought in were applicable), and without them I can only resolve to come up with lots of 'finicky' like those here. It is easy to understand why there is reluctance in their uptake.
I also think it is very folly of WR to try and create this 'perfect' picture of simple laws that can be used to cover all aspects of the game, like 'a game to be played on your feet' etc, and not accept it needs lots of little unique laws like these. I'd be really happy to create some arbitrary advantage for the scrum victors (similar angle to yours), like if you can make your scrum go forward, that resets the offside line from being the ball to the back foot etc, so as to create a way where your scrum wins a foot be "5 meters back" from the scrum becomes 7, or not being able to advance forward past the offisde line (attack gets a free run at you somehow, or devide the field into segments and require certain numbers to remain in the other sgements (like the 30m circle/fielders behind square requirements in cricket). If you're defending and you go forward then not just is your 9 still allowed to harras the opposition but the backline can move up from the 5m line to the scrum line or something.
Make it a real mini game, take your solutions and making them all circumstantial. Having differences between quick ball or ball held in longer, being able to go forward, or being pushed backwards, even to where the scrum stops and the ref puts his arm out in your favour. Think of like a quick tap scenario, but where theres no tap. If the defending team collapses the scrum in honest attempt (even allow the attacking side to collapse it after gong forward) the ball can be picked up (by say the eight) who can run forward without being allowed to be tackled until he's past the back of the scrum for example. It's like a little mini picture of where the defence is scrambling back onside after a quick tap was taken.
The purpose/intent (of any such gimmick) is that it's going to be so much harder to stop his momentum, and subsequent tempo, that it's a really good advantage for having such a powerful scrum. No change of play to a lineout or blowing of the whistle needed.
Go to comments