'He's an 80-minute player': The point of difference that could keep Rieko Ioane in the All Blacks this weekend
Much has been made of Rieko Ioane's now-infamous dropped ball over the tryline in the ensuing 48 hours following the opening Bledisloe Cup clash in Wellington.
Reaction to the missed chance to score a try - that would have almost certainly would have seen the All Blacks emerge victorious from the 16-all draw - has been comprehensive across both traditional and social media, as well as among fans.
Some have called for Ioane's head - the New Zealand Herald labelled the blunder, which stemmed from his trademark one-handed dive that caused the spillage in the act of scoring, as "unforgivable" directly after the match.
There has also been no shortage of commentary from the public, many of whom expressed their outrage on social media to brandish the cough up which occurred on the stroke of halftime, as a "brain explosion".
Others, however, have taken a softer stance on the matter, with All Blacks head coach Ian Foster refusing to lay the blame on Ioane for his side's failure to clinch victory in his first test as head coach of New Zealand.
One of Ioane's teammates, as well as a former teammate, have also voiced their support for the 23-year-old utility back, who was starting in his first test at centre after having previously played all his international rugby on the wing.
Speaking on the Aotearoa Rugby Pod, Ioane's Blues teammate and ex-All Blacks hooker James Parsons stood by the 30-test star, praising his performance in a match played in torrid conditions at Sky Stadium.
In fact, Parsons, who played twice for the All Blacks between 2014 and 2016, said he was shocked that Ioane was pulled from the field before the hour mark, and believed the knock on overshadowed what was a good showing in the first test of the year.
“I thought he was good. Seriously, I was surprised he got subbed. That’s what I said to the TV. I was like, ‘S***, he’s going off?’," Parsons said.
The veteran Blues rake revealed the reason he was surprised Ioane was substituted midway through the second half was because of how much he had shown he can offer defensively through his speed.
Renowned for his attacking ability, the defensive side of Ioane's game hasn't been heralded as much, but Parsons said his rapid pace is something the All Blacks could utilise ahead of the second Bledisloe Cup test at Eden Park in Auckland this weekend.
Parsons conceded that while Ioane was exposed on defence in the lead-up to Marika Koroibete's try for the Wallabies two days ago, he blamed that on a lack of cohesion in a backline that saw Ioane teamed up with Damian McKenzie and Jordie Barrett.
“He did get checked a little bit defensively off that lineout maul where Koroibete scored in the corner," Parsons said.
“He did get checked, but you watch his work to get back out and he actually ends up getting to his man.
“Damian McKenzie or Jordie [Barrett] needed to push earlier, but they didn’t think he could get there, so they stayed off.
“I thought McKenzie did a great job to tackle and nearly take him out, but it wasn’t just Rieko on that. I felt it was a connection thing.
“Yes, he got checked, but he got back out, and because he’s so quick, he has this ability, because he’s so fast, he can turn a bad defensive read and he saves it.
“Maybe just because they haven’t played a lot together, Damian didn’t quite know that, and he just waited a second too long and couldn’t see Rieko was coming because they were backtracking.
“But, I thought Rieko was great. I really do. He’s another one, like Caleb [Clarke], who’s got a point of difference. He can change a game."
Parsons added that although Anton Lienert-Brown - Ioane's replacement in the match - and Jack Goodhue offer a reliable defensive partnership together, the value of Ioane's physical attributes shouldn't be ignored.
“Our defence kept us in that game yesterday [Sunday] with 39 percent ball - and I can see why Anton went on with Jack and it’s a real solid defensive wall there and secure and our defence put us in a position to win the test match - but I think Rieko is good enough to be 80 minutes out there."
Ioane's former Blues teammate and current Crusaders halfback Bryn Hall doubled down on Parsons' sentiments and made light of his own try-scoring blunder during Super Rugby Aotearoa earlier this year.
Hall missed a golden opportunity to score when the Crusaders defeated the Highlanders in the penultimate round of the competition when wing Josh McKay chased him down and smacked the ball out of his grasp as he dived for the tryline.
“It’s unfortunate for the try. 99 times out of 100 he’s scoring a try like that. I know as well about not getting a try," Hall joked.
“I know it’s tough, but Rieko might actually take a bit of heat off me now."
On a more serious note, Hall agreed with Parsons about the speed that Ioane can offer, pointing to the attacking threat he poses as he gains more time in the No. 13 jersey.
“You talk about the great combinations we’ve had in the past with [Ma’a] Nonu and [Conrad] Smith and all those kinds of combinations, it doesn’t happen overnight," Hall said.
“I think he’s deserving of another start, and, like you said Jip, you can’t substitute speed. You seriously can’t substitute it.
“You talked around defensively, being able to save his a** a little but with his speed, but on attack, if you can get that guy on an out ball and being able to manipulate the defence when he’s trying to get on the outside one-on-one, nine times out of 10 with the speed, he’s going to put people in or go there himself.
“It’ll be interesting, because I thought Anton came on and played well, but I think Rieko - for his form, and I thought he was pretty good on the weekend, it’s just unfortunate that incident highlighted his performance - but I think he should be good going forward.”
Find the latest episode of the Aotearoa Rugby Podcast on your favourite audio streaming service or listen below:
Latest Comments
The boy needs to bulk up if wants to play 10 or 11 to handle those hits, otherwise he could always make a brilliant reserve for the wings if he stays away from the stretcher.
Go to commentsIn another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.
First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.
They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.
Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.
Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.
That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup
Go to comments