Highlanders told by referees that Pita Gus Sowakula's try was illegal
It may have caught global attention in the opening round of Super Rugby Pacific, but Pita Gus Sowakula's spectacular try for the Chiefs against the Highlanders last weekend should not have stood.
That's the verdict reached by New Zealand Rugby's [NZR's] referees, who have informed Highlanders head coach Tony Brown that the try was an illegal act that should have been classified as dangerous play.
Brown confirmed on Wednesday that the try, which saw Sowakula hurdle Highlanders halfback Aaron Smith to score in the left-hand corner, was now deemed by NZR as illegal after confusion reigned over whether the try should have been awarded.
Earlier this week, NZR's refereeing team conceded it was unsure of the legality of Sowakula's actions, and had even sought clarification from World Rugby about the ruling, which resulted in the verdict that a penalty should have instead been called.
“I’ve had an email from the referees, who are saying that is now illegal. Dangerous play, I think, is the ruling, even though it’s not in the law, but it’s deemed as being dangerous now," Brown told media.
Sowakula's try was an admirable feat of athleticism from the Fijian No 8, of which is rarely seen in rugby union and more common in American football.
The leap left Smith, the Highlanders captain, grasping at thin air in an attempt to stop Sowakula, and that, Brown joked, was what frustrated him more than the incorrect ruling made by the officials.
"No, no," he said when asked if he was disappointed by the on-field ruling. "I’m more disappointed in Aaron Smith, really, so I’m not worried about what happened on the weekend. I’ll just make sure Aaron does his job.”
On Tuesday, former World Rugby referee Nigel Owens weighed in on the matter, posting on Twitter that Sowakula's actions were "not defendable" as no defender can make a tackle on a player in the air, unless that player is in the act of scoring.
Latest Comments
Actually the era defining moment came a few years earlier. February 2002 to be precise, when Michael D Higgins as finance minister at the time introduced his sports persons tax relief bill to the dial. As the politicians of the day stated “It seems to be another daft K Club frolic born in Kildare amongst the well-paid professional jockeys with whom the Minister plays golf” and that the scheme represented “a savage uncaring vision of Ireland and one that should be condemned”. The irfu and Leinster would be nowhere near the position they are in today without this key component of the finances.
Go to commentsIt is crystal clear that people who make such threats on line should be tried and imprisoned. Those with responsibility in social media companies who don’t facilitate this should be convicted. In real life, I have free speech to approach someone like Reinach and verbally threaten him. I am risking a conviction or a slap but I could do it. In the old days, If someone anonymously threatened someone by letter the police would ask and use evidence from the postal system. Unlike the Post, social media companies have complete instant and legal access to the content in social media. They make money from the data, billions. Yet, they turn a blind eye to terrorism, Nazi-ism and industrial levels of threats against individuals including their address and childrens schools being published online all from ananoymous accounts not real speech. They claim free speech. The fault is with the perps but also social media companies who think anonymous personas posting death threats constitutes free speech.
Go to comments