1
How a trans-Tasman competition could be the death of Super Rugby
By Online Editors
Super Rugby as we know it is dead, and New Zealand Rugby knows that according to Australian reports.
This is the groundbreaking claim from Rugby Australia chairman Paul McLean, after speaking to his New Zealand counterpart Brent Impey over the weekend.
Impey and McLean made contact to discuss the World Rugby elections, but then moved on to Super Rugby, according to The Australian.
NZR chief executive Mark Robinson announced a major Super Rugby review this week, without giving any serious hint about a new direction. There is clearly some urgency however, with an initial report to the board scheduled for the end of June.
Virus-related travel difficulties and expense may encourage New Zealand and Australia to forge ahead without South Africa and Argentina.
The Australian, after talking to McLean, said a pandemic-shaped trans-Tasman competition could become permanent.
"I can't see and they (NZR) can't see South Africa and Argentina being involved anywhere in the short term along the way," it reported McLean as saying.
"I think they know that the competition next year may be the competition they sell to their broadcasters (long-term).
"Everyone is in the same boat and their broadcasters are under the same pressure as us, I suspect - like everyone around the world."
There is no date set for a Super Rugby resumption. New Zealand and Australia have reportedly been talking about somehow linking their two domestic competitions.
Australia is hoping their two test series against Ireland, set for July, will be played late in the year. Australia is likely to follow Queensland's lead in allowing training to resume on Friday, with matches to begin on July 1.
RA is also looking at how Aussie Rules and the NRL run their sports, in re-shaping their game.
NZR has set up a Super Rugby review named Aratipu, chaired by Blues chairman Don Mackinnon.
Robinson said New Zealand was "committed to SANZAAR and our broadcast agreement with Sky TV".
"…(there is) a real desire to drive positive change in the way Super Rugby is administered and played.
"It is a hugely positive signal for the game that Clubs, investors and NZR are coming together to do what is in the best interests for Super Rugby and rugby in New Zealand.
"Super Rugby is a vital part of our rugby eco-system and has a solid 25-year track record as a strong and admired rugby competition that has valuable intellectual property and a legacy of world class rugby. We are committed to setting New Zealand Super Rugby up to continue this success for another 25 years."
Trending on RugbyPass
2
Jake White: Ireland, Australia and Wales have the same problem
3
David Campese names his Springbok world player of the year winner
4
Let's be real about these All Blacks
5
Latest Comments
Turn it up. Give me your john A game would ya!
Go to commentsI didn't really get the should tone from it, but maybe because I was just reading it as my own thoughts.
What I read it as was examples of how they played well enough in every game to be able to win it.
Yeah I dunno if Ben wouldn't see it that way (someone else would for sure need to point it out to him though), I'm more in the Ben not appreciating that those close losses werent one off scenarios camp. Sure you can look at dubious decisions causing them to have to play with 14 or 13 men at the death as viable reasons but even in the games they won without such difficulties they made a real struggle of it (compared to how good some of their first half play was). This kind of article where you trying to point out the 3 losses really would most likely have been wins only really makes sense/works when your other performances make those 3 games (or endings) stand out.
There might have been a sentence here and there to ensure some good comment numbers but when he's signing off the article by saying things like ..
and..
I don't really see it. Always making sure people are upto date with the SH standing/perspective! NZ went through some tough times with so many different perspectives and reasons why, but then it was.. amusing how.. behind everyone was once they turned a corner. More of these 'unfortunate' results returned against SA and France at the start of the RWC which made it extra tasty to catch other teams out when they did bring it. So that created some 'conscious' perspective that I just kept going and sharing re thoughts on similar predicaments of other teams, I had been really confident that Wallabies displays vs NZ were real, that the Argentines can backup their thing against Aus and SA (and so obviously the rest), and current one is that England are actually consistent and improving with their attack (which everyone should get onboard with), and I'm expecting a more dominant display against Japan (even though they should have more of their experienced internationals for this one) that highlights further growth from July. 👍
Go to comments